• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刻板印象有助于人们在社区中与他人建立联系:对沟通中刻板印象一致性偏差的情境功能分析。

Stereotypes help people connect with others in the community: a situated functional analysis of the stereotype consistency bias in communication.

作者信息

Clark Anna E, Kashima Yoshihisa

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boerchorstraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Dec;93(6):1028-39. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1028.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1028
PMID:18072852
Abstract

Communicators tend to share more stereotype-consistent than stereotype-inconsistent information. The authors propose and test a situated functional model of this stereotype consistency bias: stereotype-consistent and inconsistent information differentially serve 2 central functions of communication--sharing information and regulating relationships; depending on the communication context, information seen to serve these different functions better is more likely communicated. Results showed that stereotype-consistent information is perceived as more socially connective but less informative than inconsistent information, and when the stereotype is perceived to be highly shared in the community, more stereotype-consistent than inconsistent information is communicated due to its greater social connectivity function. These results highlight the need to examine communication as a dynamic and situated social activity.

摘要

沟通者倾向于分享更多与刻板印象一致而非不一致的信息。作者提出并测试了这种刻板印象一致性偏差的情境功能模型:与刻板印象一致和不一致的信息在沟通的两个核心功能上发挥着不同作用——分享信息和调节关系;根据沟通情境,被认为能更好地发挥这些不同功能的信息更有可能被传达。结果表明,与刻板印象一致的信息被认为比不一致的信息更具社会联结性,但信息量更少,并且当刻板印象在群体中被认为高度共享时,由于其更强的社会联结功能,与刻板印象一致的信息比不一致的信息被更多地传达。这些结果凸显了将沟通视为一种动态的、情境化的社会活动进行考察的必要性。

相似文献

1
Stereotypes help people connect with others in the community: a situated functional analysis of the stereotype consistency bias in communication.刻板印象有助于人们在社区中与他人建立联系:对沟通中刻板印象一致性偏差的情境功能分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Dec;93(6):1028-39. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1028.
2
Communicating stereotype-relevant information: is factual information subject to the same communication biases as fictional information?传达与刻板印象相关的信息:事实性信息是否会受到与虚构信息相同的传播偏见影响?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jul;35(7):836-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167209334780. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
3
How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness.刻板印象是如何通过沟通得以维持的?刻板印象共享性的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):989-1005. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.989.
4
Not all stereotypic biases are created equal: evidence for a stereotype-disconfirming bias.并非所有刻板印象偏差都是一样的:存在一种与刻板印象不符的偏差的证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Jun;30(6):706-20. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262850.
5
The negation bias: when negations signal stereotypic expectancies.否定偏见:当否定词暗示刻板期望时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Dec;99(6):978-92. doi: 10.1037/a0020861.
6
Helping to improve the group stereotype: on the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior.助力改善群体刻板印象:论亲社会行为的战略维度
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Jun;33(6):776-88. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301023. Epub 2007 May 4.
7
Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility.感知到的共识会影响群体间行为和刻板印象的可及性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Apr;80(4):645-54.
8
Discovering that the shoe fits: the self-validating role of stereotypes.发现鞋子合适:刻板印象的自我验证作用。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;20(7):846-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02375.x. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
9
Battle of the sexes: gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations.性别之战:谈判中的性别刻板印象确认与反抗
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jun;80(6):942-58.
10
Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: attention, attribution, and individuation.偏见与刻板印象维持过程:注意力、归因与个体化
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Oct;89(4):607-22. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.607.

引用本文的文献

1
Let's Talk About Condoms: Social Engagement in a Sexual Health Intervention Targeting Young Adults in Denmark.聊聊避孕套:丹麦一项针对年轻人的性健康干预中的社会参与情况。
Int J Sex Health. 2024 Jul 1;36(4):484-504. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2360733. eCollection 2024.
2
Stereotypical Questions: How Stereotypes About Conversation Partners Are Reflected in Question Formulations.刻板印象问题:关于对话伙伴的刻板印象如何在问题表述中得以体现。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Jun;51(6):867-883. doi: 10.1177/01461672231205084. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
Social Verification Theory: A New Way to Conceptualize Validation, Dissonance, and Belonging.
社会验证理论:一种新的概念化验证、不和谐和归属感的方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2023 Aug;27(3):309-331. doi: 10.1177/10888683221138384. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
4
The Audience-Tuning Effect of Negative Stereotypes in Communication.沟通中负面刻板印象的受众调适效应
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;12:663814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663814. eCollection 2021.
5
A Polarized Discourse: Effects of Opinion Differentiation and Structural Differentiation on Communication.极化的话语:意见分歧和结构分化对沟通的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Jul;48(7):1068-1086. doi: 10.1177/01461672211030816. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
6
Android Pretending to Have Similar Traits of Imagination as Humans Evokes Stronger Perceived Capacity to Feel.拟人化的安卓设备若展现出与人类相似的想象力特质,会引发更强的感知情感能力。
Front Robot AI. 2019 Sep 18;6:88. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00088. eCollection 2019.
7
The polarizing effects of group discussion in a negative normative context: Integrating societal-, group-, and individual-level factors.群体讨论在消极规范情境下的极化效应:整合社会、群体和个体层面的因素。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;58(1):150-174. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12282. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Understanding the Effects of Stigma Messages: Danger Appraisal and Message Judgments.理解污名信息的影响:危险评估和信息判断。
Health Commun. 2019 Apr;34(4):424-436. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1405487. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
9
Persuasion, Influence, and Value: Perspectives from Communication and Social Neuroscience.说服、影响与价值:来自传播学与社会神经科学的视角。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:329-356. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011821. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
10
How can you capture cultural dynamics?你如何捕捉文化动态?
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 10;5:995. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00995. eCollection 2014.