Kim Ryangguk, Skolnick Jeffrey
Center for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 250 14th Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30318, USA.
J Comput Chem. 2008 Jun;29(8):1316-31. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20893.
The prediction of the binding free energy between a ligand and a protein is an important component in the virtual screening and lead optimization of ligands for drug discovery. To determine the quality of current binding free energy estimation programs, we examined FlexX, X-Score, AutoDock, and BLEEP for their performance in binding free energy prediction in various situations including cocrystallized complex structures, cross docking of ligands to their non-cocrystallized receptors, docking of thermally unfolded receptor decoys to their ligands, and complex structures with "randomized" ligand decoys. In no case was there a satisfactory correlation between the experimental and estimated binding free energies over all the datasets tested. Meanwhile, a strong correlation between ligand molecular weight-binding affinity correlation and experimental predicted binding affinity correlation was found. Sometimes the programs also correctly ranked ligands' binding affinities even though native interactions between the ligands and their receptors were essentially lost because of receptor deformation or ligand randomization, and the programs could not decisively discriminate randomized ligand decoys from their native ligands; this suggested that the tested programs miss important components for the accurate capture of specific ligand binding interactions.
预测配体与蛋白质之间的结合自由能是药物发现中虚拟筛选和先导化合物优化的重要组成部分。为了确定当前结合自由能估算程序的质量,我们研究了FlexX、X-Score、AutoDock和BLEEP在各种情况下预测结合自由能的性能,这些情况包括共结晶复合物结构、配体与非共结晶受体的交叉对接、热变性受体诱饵与其配体的对接以及具有“随机化”配体诱饵的复合物结构。在所有测试数据集中,实验结合自由能与估算结合自由能之间均未呈现出令人满意的相关性。同时,发现配体分子量-结合亲和力相关性与实验预测结合亲和力相关性之间存在很强的相关性。有时,尽管由于受体变形或配体随机化,配体与其受体之间的天然相互作用基本丧失,但这些程序仍能正确地对配体的结合亲和力进行排序,并且这些程序无法明确区分随机化的配体诱饵与其天然配体;这表明所测试的程序缺少准确捕捉特定配体结合相互作用的重要组成部分。