Härmä Mikko, Partinen Markku, Repo Risto, Sorsa Matti, Siivonen Pertti
Centre of Expertise on Human Factors at Work, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Chronobiol Int. 2008 Apr;25(2):413-23. doi: 10.1080/07420520802106769.
During the last ten years, severe sleepiness or falling asleep by watch keeping officers has been a direct or a contributing factor in a number of maritime accidents. This study examined the relationship between two watch systems and its impact on fatigue and sleepiness in bridge officers. A questionnaire and a sleep/work diary were sent to a representative sample of the Finnish Maritime Officer Association. In all, 185 bridge officers answered the questionnaire on sleep, work hours, and safety, including the Skogby Excessive Daytime Sleepiness index (SEDS); 42% of the bridge officers worked two 4 h watches (4/8) per day, while 26% worked two 6 h watches per day (6/6). Ninety-five of the participants completed a sleep diary for seven consecutive days while at sea. The timing of the watch duties and sleep was recorded, as was subjective sleepiness every 2 h using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS). 17.6% of the participants had fallen asleep at least once while on duty during their career. Compared to the 4/8 watch system, the officers working the 6/6 watch system reported shorter sleep durations, more frequent nodding-off on duty (7.3% vs. 1.5%), and excessive sleepiness (32% vs. 16% with SEDS>14). Based on a logistic regression analysis, high SEDS was significantly related with probable obstructive sleep apnea (OR 5.7), the 6/6 watch system (OR 4.0), and morningness-eveningness while controlling simultaneously several individual and sleep-related factors. Subjective sleepiness (KSS) was highest at 04:00 and 06:00 h. In a multivariate analysis, the KSS was significantly related to time of day, time after awaking, sleep length, and interactions of the watch systems with age, morningness-eveningness, and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) score. Severe sleepiness at 04:00-06:00 h was especially problematic in the 6/6 watch system among evening types and among the bridge officers with high ESS. The results suggest the 6/6 watch system is related to a higher risk of severe sleepiness during the early morning hours compared to the 4/8 and the other watch systems assessed.
在过去十年间,值班船员出现严重困倦或睡着的情况一直是多起海上事故的直接或促成因素。本研究调查了两种值班制度之间的关系及其对驾引人员疲劳和困倦的影响。向芬兰海事官员协会的一个代表性样本发放了一份问卷和一份睡眠/工作日记。共有185名驾引人员回答了关于睡眠、工作时间和安全的问卷,包括斯科格比日间过度嗜睡指数(SEDS);42%的驾引人员每天值两个4小时班(4/8),而26%的驾引人员每天值两个6小时班(6/6)。95名参与者在海上连续七天完成了一份睡眠日记。记录了值班任务和睡眠的时间,以及每隔2小时使用卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表(KSS)记录的主观嗜睡程度。17.6%的参与者在其职业生涯中至少有一次在值班时睡着过。与4/8值班制度相比,采用6/6值班制度的船员报告的睡眠时间更短,值班时更频繁打瞌睡(7.3%对1.5%),以及过度嗜睡(SEDS>14时,分别为32%和16%)。基于逻辑回归分析,在同时控制多个个体和睡眠相关因素的情况下,高SEDS与可能的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OR 5.7)、6/6值班制度(OR 4.0)以及晨型-夜型显著相关。主观嗜睡程度(KSS)在04:00和06:00时最高。在多变量分析中,KSS与一天中的时间、醒来后的时间、睡眠时长以及值班制度与年龄、晨型-夜型和爱泼华嗜睡量表(ESS)得分的相互作用显著相关。在夜型人员和ESS得分高的驾引人员中,04:00 - 06:00时的严重嗜睡在6/6值班制度中尤其成问题。结果表明,与4/8值班制度及其他评估的值班制度相比,6/6值班制度在清晨时段出现严重嗜睡的风险更高。