Nagle Cate, Lewis Sharon, Meiser Bettina, Gunn Jane, Halliday Jane, Bell Robin
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, VIC, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 28;8:114. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-114.
Recent developments have made screening tests for foetal abnormalities available earlier in pregnancy and women have a range of testing options accessible to them. It is now recommended that all women, regardless of their age, are provided with information on prenatal screening tests. General Practitioners (GPs) are often the first health professionals a woman consults in pregnancy. As such, GPs are well positioned to inform women of the increasing range of prenatal screening tests available. The aim of this study was to explore GPs experience of informing women of prenatal genetic screening tests for foetal abnormality.
A qualitative study consisting of four focus groups was conducted in metropolitan and rural Victoria, Australia. A discussion guide was used and the audio-taped transcripts were independently coded by two researchers using thematic analysis. Multiple coders and analysts and informant feedback were employed to reduce the potential for researcher bias and increase the validity of the findings.
Six themes were identified and classified as 'intrinsic' if they occurred within the context of the consultation or 'extrinsic' if they consisted of elements that impacted on the GP beyond the scope of the consultation. The three intrinsic themes were the way GPs explained the limitations of screening, the extent to which GPs provided information selectively and the time pressures at play. The three extrinsic factors were GPs' attitudes and values towards screening, the conflict they experienced in offering screening information and the sense of powerlessness within the screening test process and the health care system generally. Extrinsic themes reveal GPs' attitudes and values to screening and to disability, as well as raising questions about the fundamental premise of testing.
The increasing availability and utilisation of screening tests, in particular first trimester tests, has expanded GPs' role in facilitating women's informed decision-making. Recognition of the importance of providing this complex information warrants longer consultations to respond to the time pressures that GPs experience. Understanding the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that impact on GPs may serve to shape educational resources to be more appropriate, relevant and supportive.
近期的发展使得在孕期更早地进行胎儿异常筛查测试成为可能,女性也有一系列可供选择的检测方法。现在建议向所有女性,无论其年龄大小,提供有关产前筛查测试的信息。全科医生(GPs)通常是女性在孕期咨询的首位医疗保健专业人员。因此,全科医生处于有利位置,能够告知女性现有的越来越多的产前筛查测试。本研究的目的是探讨全科医生向女性告知胎儿异常产前基因筛查测试的经验。
在澳大利亚维多利亚州的大都市和农村地区进行了一项由四个焦点小组组成的定性研究。使用了讨论指南,两名研究人员通过主题分析对录音转录本进行独立编码。采用多名编码员、分析师和信息提供者反馈来减少研究人员偏差的可能性,并提高研究结果的有效性。
确定了六个主题,如果这些主题出现在咨询过程中,则归类为“内在”主题;如果它们包含超出咨询范围对全科医生产生影响的因素,则归类为“外在”主题。三个内在主题是全科医生解释筛查局限性的方式、全科医生有选择地提供信息的程度以及存在的时间压力。三个外在因素是全科医生对筛查的态度和价值观、他们在提供筛查信息时所经历的冲突以及在筛查测试过程和整个医疗保健系统中普遍存在的无力感。外在主题揭示了全科医生对筛查和残疾的态度及价值观,同时也引发了关于检测基本前提的问题。
筛查测试,尤其是孕早期测试的可用性和使用率不断提高,扩大了全科医生在促进女性做出明智决策方面的作用。认识到提供这些复杂信息的重要性,需要更长时间的咨询以应对全科医生所面临的时间压力。了解影响全科医生的内在和外在因素可能有助于使教育资源更合适、相关且具有支持性。