Chtara Moktar, Chaouachi Anis, Levin Gregory T, Chaouachi Mustapha, Chamari Karim, Amri Mohamed, Laursen Paul B
Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Ksar Said, Tunis, Tunisia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1037-45. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a4419.
The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the sequence order of high-intensity endurance training and circuit training on changes in muscular strength and anaerobic power. Forty-eight physical education students (ages, 21.4 +/- 1.3 years) were assigned to 1 of 5 groups: no training controls (C, n = 9), endurance training (E, n = 10), circuit training (S, n = 9), endurance before circuit training in the same session, (E+S, n = 10), and circuit before endurance training in the same session (S+E, n = 10). Subjects performed 2 sessions per week for 12 weeks. Resistance-type circuit training targeted strength endurance (weeks 1-6) and explosive strength and power (weeks 7-12). Endurance training sessions included 5 repetitions run at the velocity associated with Vo2max (Vo2max) for a duration equal to 50% of the time to exhaustion at Vo2max; recovery was for an equal period at 60% Vo2max. Maximal strength in the half squat, strength endurance in the 1-leg half squat and hip extension, and explosive strength and power in a 5-jump test and countermovement jump were measured pre- and post-testing. No significant differences were shown following training between the S+E and E+S groups for all exercise tests. However, both S+E and E+S groups improved less than the S group in 1 repetition maximum (p < 0.01), right and left 1-leg half squat (p < 0.02), 5-jump test (p < 0.01), peak jumping force (p < 0.05), peak jumping power (p < 0.02), and peak jumping height (p < 0.05). The intrasession sequence did not influence the adaptive response of muscular strength and explosive strength and power. Circuit training alone induced strength and power improvements that were significantly greater than when resistance and endurance training were combined, irrespective of the intrasession sequencing.
本研究的目的是探讨高强度耐力训练和循环训练的顺序对肌肉力量和无氧功率变化的影响。48名体育专业学生(年龄21.4±1.3岁)被分为5组中的1组:无训练对照组(C组,n = 9)、耐力训练组(E组,n = 10)、循环训练组(S组,n = 9)、同一会次中先进行耐力训练后进行循环训练组(E+S组,n = 10)以及同一会次中先进行循环训练后进行耐力训练组(S+E组,n = 10)。受试者每周进行2次训练,共12周。抗阻型循环训练针对力量耐力(第1 - 6周)以及爆发力和功率(第7 - 12周)。耐力训练课程包括以与最大摄氧量(Vo2max)相关的速度进行5次重复跑,持续时间等于在Vo2max时力竭时间的50%;恢复时间为以60%Vo2max的速度进行相同时长的恢复。在测试前后测量半蹲的最大力量、单腿半蹲和髋部伸展的力量耐力以及5跳测试和反向纵跳中的爆发力和功率。在所有运动测试中,训练后S+E组和E+S组之间未显示出显著差异。然而,S+E组和E+S组在1次重复最大值(p < 0.01)、左右单腿半蹲(p < 0.02)、5跳测试(p < 0.01)、峰值跳跃力(p < 0.05)、峰值跳跃功率(p < 0.02)和峰值跳跃高度(p < 0.05)方面的改善均小于S组。同一会次中的训练顺序并未影响肌肉力量、爆发力和功率的适应性反应。无论同一会次中的训练顺序如何,单独进行循环训练所带来的力量和功率提升显著大于抗阻训练和耐力训练相结合时的提升。