Hansen Claus D, Andersen Johan H
Department of Occupational Medicine, Herning Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(6):956-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.022. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a broad range of possible factors relating to work, personal circumstances and attitudes towards sickness absence on a person's decision to go to work despite feeling ill, a phenomenon that has been termed sickness presence (SP), or 'presenteeism', in the literature. Using data from a random sample of 12,935 members from the core Danish work force the hypotheses were tested in a cross-sectional design utilising ordered logistic regression models. The results indicate that more than 70% of the core work force goes ill to work at least once during a 12-month period. This means that SP is just as prevalent a phenomenon as sickness absence. Many of the results from earlier studies of SP were replicated and new factors were discovered: for example time pressure (having a supervisory role and/or working more than 45 h per week) and relationship with colleagues (measured by working in a small company, having non-standard hours and degree of cooperation) both increase the likelihood of SP. However, personal circumstances and attitudes, e.g. treating work as home (cf. Hochschild's thesis) and being over-committed to work, were also found to lead to higher levels of SP. Finally, we found that those with a conservative attitude to absence were most likely to turn up ill at work. Overall, work-related factors seem to be slightly more important than personal circumstances or attitudes in determining people's 'decision' to go ill at work. However, the relatively low explanatory power of these combined factors suggests that there are still many unknowns in this field of research.
本研究的目的是评估一系列与工作、个人情况以及对病假态度相关的可能因素,对一个人尽管感觉不适仍决定去上班这一现象(该现象在文献中被称为带病出勤(SP)或“出勤主义”)的影响。利用来自丹麦核心劳动力中12935名成员的随机样本数据,在横截面设计中使用有序逻辑回归模型对假设进行了检验。结果表明,超过70%的核心劳动力在12个月期间至少有一次带病上班。这意味着带病出勤与病假缺勤一样普遍。早期关于带病出勤的许多研究结果得到了重复验证,并且发现了一些新因素:例如时间压力(担任监督角色和/或每周工作超过45小时)以及与同事的关系(通过在小公司工作、非标准工作时间和合作程度来衡量)都增加了带病出勤的可能性。然而,个人情况和态度,例如将工作视为家庭(参照霍克希尔德的论点)以及过度投入工作,也被发现会导致更高水平的带病出勤。最后,我们发现对缺勤持保守态度的人最有可能带病上班。总体而言,在决定人们带病上班的“决策”方面,与工作相关的因素似乎比个人情况或态度略为重要。然而,这些综合因素相对较低的解释力表明,该研究领域仍存在许多未知因素。