• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新鲜水果和蔬菜中对单核细胞增生李斯特菌具有生物保护作用的明串珠菌菌株。

Bioprotective Leuconostoc strains against Listeria monocytogenes in fresh fruits and vegetables.

作者信息

Trias Rosalia, Badosa Esther, Montesinos Emilio, Bañeras Lluís

机构信息

Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology-CeRTA, CIDSAV, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi 17071, Girona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Sep 30;127(1-2):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.06.011
PMID:18625532
Abstract

Ten Leuconostoc mesenteroides and one Ln. citreum strains isolated from fresh fruit and vegetables were tested for their antagonistic capacity against Listeria monocytogenes. Genetic differences among strains were analyzed by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD). All the isolates clustered together and differed from the type strain Ln. mesenteroides ATCC 8293 as well as from Ln. fallax and Ln. citreum. Organic acids, hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins were detected as main inhibition mechanisms. Characterization of culture supernatants from the bacteriocinogenic strains, CM135 and CM160 revealed a high resistance of antibacterial activity to temperature and pH, and a bactericidal mode of action against L. monocytogenes. Produced bacteriocins belonged to the Class IIa and sequencing of genes showed complete homology with mesentericin Y105. A study of the effect of the relative dose of pathogen and LAB on control of L. monocytogenes in wounds of Golden Delicious apples and Iceberg lettuce leaf cuts was performed. A comparison of the dose of bioprotective strain needed for a ten fold reduction of the viable pathogen concentration (ED90) revealed that strain CM160 was the most effective against L. monocytogenes. ED90 values varied from 1.3.10(4) to 5.0.10(5) cfu.g(-1) or wound, at ranges of pathogen levels from 1.0.10(3) to 5.0.10(4) cfu.g(-1) of lettuce or wound of apple. The efficiency of the strains was also calculated as the ratio of the ED90 value to the pathogen dose inoculated. The lowest ratio was found for strain CM160 at 5 to 50 cells of LAB per cell of pathogen. The strain offers potential application for prevention of the presence of L. monocytogenes in fresh fruit and vegetables.

摘要

对从新鲜水果和蔬菜中分离出的10株肠系膜明串珠菌和1株柠檬明串珠菌菌株进行了针对单核细胞增生李斯特菌的拮抗能力测试。通过随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)分析菌株之间的遗传差异。所有分离株聚在一起,与肠系膜明串珠菌模式菌株ATCC 8293以及类明串珠菌和柠檬明串珠菌不同。检测到有机酸、过氧化氢和细菌素是主要抑制机制。对产细菌素菌株CM135和CM160的培养上清液进行表征,结果显示其抗菌活性对温度和pH具有高耐受性,并且对单核细胞增生李斯特菌具有杀菌作用方式。产生的细菌素属于IIa类,基因测序显示与肠膜菌素Y105完全同源。进行了一项关于病原体和乳酸菌相对剂量对金冠苹果伤口和卷心莴苣叶片切口处单核细胞增生李斯特菌控制效果的研究。对使活菌病原体浓度降低10倍所需的生物保护菌株剂量(ED90)进行比较,结果显示菌株CM160对单核细胞增生李斯特菌最有效。在生菜或苹果伤口的病原体水平范围为1.0×10³至5.0×10⁴ cfu·g⁻¹时,ED90值在1.3×10⁴至5.0×10⁵ cfu·g⁻¹或伤口之间变化。还计算了菌株的效率,即ED90值与接种病原体剂量的比值。在每细胞病原体对应5至50个乳酸菌细胞时,菌株CM160的比值最低。该菌株在预防新鲜水果和蔬菜中单核细胞增生李斯特菌的存在方面具有潜在应用价值。

相似文献

1
Bioprotective Leuconostoc strains against Listeria monocytogenes in fresh fruits and vegetables.新鲜水果和蔬菜中对单核细胞增生李斯特菌具有生物保护作用的明串珠菌菌株。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Sep 30;127(1-2):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
2
Processing plant persistent strains of Listeria monocytogenes appear to have a lower virulence potential than clinical strains in selected virulence models.在特定毒力模型中,加工工厂中持续存在的单核细胞增生李斯特菌菌株的毒力潜力似乎低于临床菌株。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Apr 30;123(3):254-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.016. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
3
Leucocins 4010 from Leuconostoc carnosum cause a matrix related decrease in intracellular pH of Listeria monocytogenes.来自肉囊乳杆菌的白细胞素4010会导致单核细胞增生李斯特菌细胞内pH值因基质而下降。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006 May;258(2):208-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00219.x.
4
Leuconostoc citreum MB1 as biocontrol agent of Listeria monocytogenes in milk.柠檬明串珠菌MB1作为牛奶中单核细胞增生李斯特菌的生物防治剂。
J Dairy Res. 2014 May;81(2):137-45. doi: 10.1017/S002202991300068X. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
5
Characterization of new bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria isolated using a medium designed to simulate inhibition of Listeria by Lactobacillus sakei 2512 on meat.使用一种旨在模拟清酒乳杆菌2512对肉类中李斯特菌抑制作用的培养基分离得到的新型产细菌素乳酸菌的特性分析。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Jan 1;113(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.07.016. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
6
Smearing of soft cheese with Enterococcus faecium WHE 81, a multi-bacteriocin producer, against Listeria monocytogenes.用多细菌素产生菌粪肠球菌WHE 81涂抹软奶酪以对抗单核细胞增生李斯特菌。
Food Microbiol. 2009 Feb;26(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
7
The effect of bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus plantarum strains on the intracellular pH of sessile and planktonic Listeria monocytogenes single cells.植物乳杆菌产生细菌素对静止和浮游状态单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌单细胞细胞内 pH 的影响。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Jul 31;141 Suppl 1:S53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.040. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
8
Influence of bacteriocin-like substance, generation times, and genetic profiles of Listeria innocua on the isolation of Listeria monocytogenes.无害李斯特菌的类细菌素物质、代时和基因图谱对单核细胞增生李斯特菌分离的影响
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 May;28(3):177-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2005.01.002.
9
Microbiological quality of fresh, minimally-processed fruit and vegetables, and sprouts from retail establishments.零售场所新鲜、最少加工的水果、蔬菜及豆芽的微生物质量。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Mar 31;123(1-2):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.013. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
10
Bioprotection of Golden Delicious apples and Iceberg lettuce against foodborne bacterial pathogens by lactic acid bacteria.乳酸菌对金冠苹果和生菜抵御食源性病原体的生物保护作用
Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Mar 31;123(1-2):50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.065. Epub 2007 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Temperature, Surface, and Medium Qualities on the Biofilm Formation of and Their Influencing Effects on the Antibacterial, Biofilm-Inhibitory, and Biofilm-Degrading Activities of Essential Oils.温度、表面及介质性质对[具体细菌名称未给出]生物膜形成的影响及其对精油抗菌、生物膜抑制和生物膜降解活性的影响
Foods. 2025 Jun 14;14(12):2097. doi: 10.3390/foods14122097.
2
Monitoring the Bioprotective Potential of Culture on Pathogen Survival and the Shelf-Life of Fresh Ready-to-Eat Salads Stored under Modified Atmosphere Packaging.监测气调包装下培养物对病原体存活及即食新鲜沙拉货架期的生物保护潜力。
Pathogens. 2024 Jul 2;13(7):557. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13070557.
3
Essential Oils and Their Combination with Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacteriocins to Improve the Safety and Shelf Life of Foods: A Review.
精油及其与乳酸菌和细菌素的组合对提高食品安全性和保质期的作用:综述
Foods. 2023 Sep 1;12(17):3288. doi: 10.3390/foods12173288.
4
Strategies for the Development of Bioprotective Cultures in Food Preservation.食品保鲜中生物防护培养物的开发策略。
Int J Microbiol. 2022 Dec 14;2022:6264170. doi: 10.1155/2022/6264170. eCollection 2022.
5
Bacteria as Biological Control Agents of Plant Diseases.细菌作为植物病害的生物防治剂。
Microorganisms. 2022 Aug 31;10(9):1759. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10091759.
6
Eco-Friendly Edible Packaging Systems Based on Live- MM5 for the Control of in Fresh Vegetables.基于活MM5的环保型可食用包装系统用于控制新鲜蔬菜中的[具体内容缺失]
Foods. 2022 Aug 30;11(17):2632. doi: 10.3390/foods11172632.
7
Mapping the Key Technological and Functional Characteristics of Indigenous Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Greek Traditional Dairy Products.绘制从希腊传统乳制品中分离出的本土乳酸菌的关键技术和功能特性图谱。
Microorganisms. 2022 Jan 23;10(2):246. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020246.
8
Bio-Preservative Potential of Microorganisms Isolated from Red Grape against Food Contaminant Fungi.从红葡萄中分离的微生物对食品污染物真菌的生物防腐剂潜力。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Jun 10;13(6):412. doi: 10.3390/toxins13060412.
9
Antimicrobial Efficacy of spp. Isolated from Indian Meat against and in Spinach Leaves.从印度肉类中分离出的菌株对菠菜叶中的[具体菌名1]和[具体菌名2]的抗菌效果
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019 Aug;39(4):677-685. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e60. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
10
Pentocin MQ1: A Novel, Broad-Spectrum, Pore-Forming Bacteriocin From CS2 With Quorum Sensing Regulatory Mechanism and Biopreservative Potential.戊糖菌素MQ1:一种来自CS2的新型广谱成孔细菌素,具有群体感应调节机制和生物防腐潜力。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Mar 27;9:564. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00564. eCollection 2018.