• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犯罪再犯的动态预测:一项三波前瞻性研究。

The dynamic prediction of criminal recidivism: a three-wave prospective study.

作者信息

Brown Shelley L, St Amand Michelle D, Zamble Edward

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2009 Feb;33(1):25-45. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9139-7. Epub 2008 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10979-008-9139-7
PMID:18629620
Abstract

A three-wave, prospective panel design was used to assess the extent to which static and dynamic risk factors could predict criminal recidivism in a sample of 136 adult male offenders released from Canadian federal prisons. Static measures were assessed only once, prior to release while dynamic measures were assessed on three separate occasions: pre-release, 1 month, and 3 months post-release. Recidivism was coded during an average of 10.2-month follow-up period (SD=19.2). A series of Cox regression survival analyses with time-dependent covariates and Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to assess predictive validity. Although the combined static and time-dependent dynamic model (AUC=.89, CI=.81-.93) significantly (p<.01) outperformed the pure static model (AUC=.81, CI=.73-.87) the confidence intervals did overlap to some extent. Implications for dynamic risk assessment and management are discussed.

摘要

采用三波前瞻性面板设计,以评估静态和动态风险因素在多大程度上能够预测从加拿大联邦监狱释放的136名成年男性罪犯样本中的再次犯罪情况。静态测量仅在释放前评估一次,而动态测量在三个不同时间点进行评估:释放前、释放后1个月和3个月。在平均10.2个月的随访期(标准差=19.2)内对再次犯罪进行编码。进行了一系列带有时间依存协变量的Cox回归生存分析和接受者操作特征(ROC)分析,以评估预测效度。尽管静态和时间依存动态模型相结合(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.89,可信区间[CI]=0.81-0.93)显著(p<0.01)优于纯静态模型(AUC=0.81,CI=0.73-0.87),但可信区间在一定程度上确实存在重叠。讨论了动态风险评估和管理的意义。

相似文献

1
The dynamic prediction of criminal recidivism: a three-wave prospective study.犯罪再犯的动态预测:一项三波前瞻性研究。
Law Hum Behav. 2009 Feb;33(1):25-45. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9139-7. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
2
Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.对再犯罪风险的无指导临床和精算评估:与丹麦性犯罪者的直接比较。
Sex Abuse. 2007 Jun;19(2):135-53. doi: 10.1177/107906320701900205. Epub 2007 May 30.
3
Beyond static and dynamic risk factors: the incremental validity of release planning for predicting sex offender recidivism.超越静态和动态风险因素:释放计划对预测性犯罪者再犯的增量有效性。
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jan;27(2):222-38. doi: 10.1177/0886260511416472. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
4
Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).使用犯罪思维方式心理量表(PICTS)预测性犯罪者的累犯情况。
Assessment. 2015 Apr;22(2):167-77. doi: 10.1177/1073191114539384. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
5
Criminal recidivism among juvenile offenders: testing the incremental and predictive validity of three measures of psychopathic features.青少年罪犯中的犯罪再犯:检验三种精神病态特征测量方法的增量效度和预测效度。
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Oct;32(5):423-38. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9114-8. Epub 2007 Dec 6.
6
How useful are psychometric scores in predicting recidivism for treated sex offenders?心理测量分数在预测已接受治疗的性犯罪者的再犯情况方面有多大用处?
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2012 May;56(3):420-46. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11403125. Epub 2011 Apr 24.
7
Violent criminal recidivism in mentally disordered offenders: a follow-up study of 13-20 years through different sanctions.精神障碍罪犯的暴力犯罪再犯:通过不同制裁进行的 13-20 年随访研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013 May-Aug;36(3-4):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 May 11.
8
Static and dynamic patient characteristics as predictors of criminal recidivism: A prospective study in a Dutch forensic psychiatric sample.静态和动态患者特征作为犯罪再犯的预测因素:一项针对荷兰法医精神病学样本的前瞻性研究。
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Jun;30(3):309-27. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9013-4.
9
A multisite examination of sexual violence risk and therapeutic change.一项关于性暴力风险与治疗变化的多地点研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):312-24. doi: 10.1037/a0035340. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
10
Does Change on the MOLEST and RAPE Scales Predict Sexual Recidivism?MOLEST和RAPE量表上的变化能否预测性再犯?
Sex Abuse. 2016 Aug;28(5):427-47. doi: 10.1177/1079063214540725. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study of Success in Postrelease Federal Inmates With Mental Health Issues.精神健康问题的获释联邦囚犯的成功因素定性研究。
J Correct Health Care. 2021 Mar;27(1):40-50. doi: 10.1089/jchc.19.02.0009. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
Daily Assessment of Acute Dynamic Risk in Paroled Offenders: Prediction, Predictive Accuracy and Intervention Effect.假释罪犯急性动态风险的每日评估:预测、预测准确性及干预效果
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Apr 30;24(5):715-729. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1308219. eCollection 2017.
3
Behind bars but connected to family: Evidence for the benefits of family contact during incarceration.
被监禁但与家人保持联系:监禁期间家庭联系的好处的证据。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Jun;33(4):453-464. doi: 10.1037/fam0000520. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Measurement of Change in Dynamic Factors Using the START:AV.使用START:AV测量动态因素的变化。
J Forensic Psychol Res Pract. 2017;17(3):198-215. doi: 10.1080/24732850.2017.1317560. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
5
The role of marriage in criminal recidivism: a longitudinal and co-relative analysis.婚姻在犯罪再犯中的作用:纵向和相关分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Dec;26(6):655-663. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000640. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
6
An examination of change in dynamic risk of offending over time among serious juvenile offenders.对严重少年犯随时间推移的动态犯罪风险变化的考察。
J Crim Justice. 2016 Jun;45:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.008.
7
Identifying Causal Risk Factors for Violence among Discharged Patients.识别出院患者暴力行为的因果风险因素。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0142493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142493. eCollection 2015.
8
Does substance misuse moderate the relationship between criminal thinking and recidivism?物质滥用是否会缓和犯罪思维与累犯之间的关系?
J Crim Justice. 2015 January-February;43(1):12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.11.001.
9
Can perspective-taking reduce crime? Examining a pathway through empathic-concern and guilt-proneness.换位思考能减少犯罪吗?探究一条通过共情关注和内疚倾向的途径。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Dec;40(12):1659-67. doi: 10.1177/0146167214554915. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
Neuroprediction, Violence, and the Law: Setting the Stage.神经预测、暴力与法律:搭建舞台。
Neuroethics. 2012 Apr 1;5(1):67-99. doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9095-z.