Suppr超能文献

阿拉巴马州基层医疗环境中的儿童定量视力筛查。

Quantitative pediatric vision screening in primary care settings in Alabama.

作者信息

Marsh-Tootle Wendy L, Wall Terry C, Tootle John S, Person Sharina D, Kristofco Robert E

机构信息

School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Sep;85(9):849-56. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318185282a.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Alabama Medicaid reimburses "objective" vision screening (VS), i.e., by acuity or similar quantitative method, and well child checks (WCCs) separately. We analyzed the frequency of each service obtained.

METHODS

Claims for WCC and VS provided between October 1, 2002 and September 30, 2003 for children aged 3 to 18 years, and summary data for all enrolled children, were obtained from Alabama Medicaid. We used univariate analysis followed by logistic regression to explore the potential influence of factors (patient age, provider type, and provider's volume of WCCs) on the receipt of VS at pre-school ages.

RESULTS

Children receiving WCCs were 55% black, 40% white, and 5% other. Percentages of children with WCC claims were highest at 4 years (57%) and thereafter declined to 30% at 6 to 14 years and to <10% at 18 years. Nearly all VS (>98% at each age) occurred the same day as the WCC. Pediatricians provided 68% of all WCCs. Multivariate analysis, after adjusting for nesting of pre-school patients within provider, showed the odds ratios (ORs) of VS were increased by patient age (5 years vs. 3 years, OR = 3.57, p < 0.0001), nonphysician provider type (nonphysician vs. pediatrician, OR = 1.80, p = 0.0004) and high WCC volume (at or above vs. below the median number (n = 8) of WCC per provider per year (OR = 7.11, p < 0.0001)). Because VS rates were high when attendance to WCC visits was low, few enrolled children received VS at any age (6% at the age of 3, 13% at the age of 4, and a maximum of 20% at the age of 5).

CONCLUSIONS

National efforts to reduce preventable vision loss from amblyopia are hampered because children are not available for screening and because providers miss many opportunities to screen vision at pre-school age. Efforts to improve VS should target pediatrician-led practices, because these serve greater numbers of children.

摘要

目的

阿拉巴马医疗补助计划分别报销“客观”视力筛查(VS),即通过视力或类似定量方法进行的筛查,以及健康儿童检查(WCC)。我们分析了每项服务的获取频率。

方法

从阿拉巴马医疗补助计划获取了2002年10月1日至2003年9月30日期间3至18岁儿童的WCC和VS索赔数据,以及所有登记儿童的汇总数据。我们先进行单因素分析,然后进行逻辑回归,以探讨因素(患者年龄、提供者类型和提供者的WCC数量)对学龄前儿童接受VS的潜在影响。

结果

接受WCC的儿童中,55%为黑人,40%为白人,5%为其他种族。有WCC索赔的儿童比例在4岁时最高(57%),此后在6至14岁时降至30%,在18岁时降至<10%。几乎所有的VS(各年龄组均>98%)都与WCC在同一天进行。儿科医生提供了所有WCC的68%。在对学龄前患者在提供者内部的嵌套情况进行调整后的多因素分析显示,VS的优势比(OR)因患者年龄(5岁与3岁相比,OR = 3.57,p < 0.0001)、非医生提供者类型(非医生与儿科医生相比,OR = 1.80,p = 0.0004)以及高WCC数量(每年每个提供者的WCC数量在中位数(n = 8)及以上与以下相比,OR = 7.11,p < 0.0001)而增加。由于在WCC就诊率较低时VS率较高,很少有登记儿童在任何年龄接受VS(3岁时为6%,4岁时为13%,5岁时最高为20%)。

结论

全国减少弱视导致的可预防视力丧失的努力受到阻碍,原因是儿童无法接受筛查,以及提供者在学龄前错过许多视力筛查机会。改善VS的努力应针对由儿科医生主导的诊疗机构,因为这些机构服务的儿童数量更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验