De Simoni Anna, Allen Nicola J, Attwell David
Department of Physiology, University College London, London, UK.
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Sep;28(6):1146-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06417.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
The membrane properties of isolated cultured microglia have been extensively studied but it is important to understand their properties in situ, where they protect the brain against infection, but also contribute to neurodegenerative diseases. Microglia and macrophages attack bacteria by generating reactive oxygen species, a process which involves NADPH oxidase pumping electrons out across the cell membrane. The resulting inward current evokes a depolarization, which would inhibit the activity of the NADPH oxidase if there were no charge-compensating current which moves positive charge out across the membrane. The mechanism of this charge compensation is controversial. In neutrophils and in cultured microglia a depolarization-activated H(+) conductance has been proposed to provide charge compensation, and also to remove protons generated intracellularly by the NADPH oxidase. Alternatively, a depolarization-activated K(+) conductance has been proposed to mediate charge compensation. Here we show that in microglia, either in the resting state or when activated by the bacterial coat component lipopolysaccharide, both in acute and in cultured hippocampal slices, no significant H(+) current is detectable. This implies that the membrane properties of microglia in their normal cellular environment differ from those of cultured microglia (similarly, microglia generated a current in response to ATP but, unlike in culture, not to glutamate or GABA). Furthermore, the K(+) current (Kv1.3) that is activated by lipopolysaccharide is inactivated by depolarization, making it unsuitable for mediating charge compensation on a long time scale at positive voltages. Instead, charge compensation may be mediated by a previously undescribed non-selective cation current.
分离培养的小胶质细胞的膜特性已得到广泛研究,但了解它们在原位的特性很重要,在原位它们既能保护大脑免受感染,也会导致神经退行性疾病。小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞通过产生活性氧来攻击细菌,这一过程涉及NADPH氧化酶将电子泵出细胞膜。由此产生的内向电流会引发去极化,如果没有将正电荷移出细胞膜的电荷补偿电流,这种去极化会抑制NADPH氧化酶的活性。这种电荷补偿的机制存在争议。在中性粒细胞和培养的小胶质细胞中,有人提出去极化激活的H(+)电导可提供电荷补偿,同时也可清除NADPH氧化酶在细胞内产生的质子。另外,有人提出去极化激活的K(+)电导可介导电荷补偿。在这里我们表明,无论是在静息状态还是被细菌包膜成分脂多糖激活时,在急性和培养的海马切片中的小胶质细胞中,均未检测到明显的H(+)电流。这意味着小胶质细胞在其正常细胞环境中的膜特性与培养的小胶质细胞不同(同样,小胶质细胞会对ATP产生电流反应,但与在培养环境中不同,对谷氨酸或GABA无反应)。此外,脂多糖激活的K(+)电流(Kv1.3)会因去极化而失活,这使得它在正电压下长时间内不适于介导电荷补偿。相反,电荷补偿可能由一种以前未描述的非选择性阳离子电流介导。