• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Anthropology and Epidemiology: learning epistemological lessons through a collaborative venture.人类学与流行病学:通过合作项目汲取认识论教训
Cien Saude Colet. 2008 Nov-Dec;13(6):1701-10. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232008000600002.
2
Disciplinary capture and epistemological obstacles to interdisciplinary research: Lessons from central African conservation disputes.跨学科研究的学科俘获与认识论障碍:来自中非保护争端的教训
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2016 Apr;56:82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Exploring multiple trajectories of causality: collaboration between Anthropology and Epidemiology in the 1982 birth cohort, Pelotas, Southern Brazil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2008 Dec;42 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):115-23. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102008000900016.
4
Qualitative Study定性研究
5
Navigating scale and interdisciplinary dynamics in conservation social science.应对保护社会科学中的规模与跨学科动态
Conserv Biol. 2025 Apr;39(2):e70005. doi: 10.1111/cobi.70005.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Medical anthropology and epidemiology: a collaborative venture for mental health research in India.医学人类学与流行病学:在印度开展精神健康研究的合作领域
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2021 Feb-Mar;33(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1733793. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
Understanding disciplinary perspectives: a framework to develop skills for interdisciplinary research collaborations of medical experts and engineers.理解学科视角:培养医学专家和工程师跨学科研究合作技能的框架。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05913-1.
9
Medical anthropology and epidemiology: divergences or convergences?
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Feb;40(3):285-90. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0029-r.
10
Collaborative ethnography and a call for pluralism and dialogic knowledge in health equity debates and global cancer research culture.合作民族志以及在健康公平辩论和全球癌症研究文化中对多元主义和对话性知识的呼吁。
Anthropol Med. 2024 Dec;31(4):388-405. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2024.2416806. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication, Cognition and Competency Development in Healthcare: A Model for Integrating Cognitive Ethnography and Communication Skills Training in Clinical Interventions.医疗保健中的沟通、认知与能力发展:一种将认知民族志与临床干预中的沟通技能培训相结合的模式。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Jan 9;11:23821205231223319. doi: 10.1177/23821205231223319. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
The politicizing clinic: insights on 'the social' for mental health policy and practice.政治化的诊所:对心理健康政策和实践“社会”的洞察。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;59(3):523-536. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02573-2. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
3
Suspension of social welfare services and mental health outcomes for women during the COVID-19 pandemic in a peripheral neighborhood in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗一个边缘社区在新冠疫情期间妇女社会福利服务的暂停及其心理健康状况
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 15;13:897276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.897276. eCollection 2022.
4
Digging deeper in Shanghai: towards a 'mechanism-rich' epidemiology.深入上海研究:迈向“机制丰富”的流行病学。
Int Health. 2019 Oct 31;11(S1):S14-S23. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz057.
5
Beyond interviews and focus groups: a framework for integrating innovative qualitative methods into randomised controlled trials of complex public health interventions.超越访谈和焦点小组:将创新的定性方法纳入复杂公共卫生干预措施的随机对照试验的框架。
Trials. 2019 Jun 6;20(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3439-8.
6
Value and Limitations of Broad Brush Surveys Used in Community-Randomized Trials in Southern Africa.在南部非洲进行社区随机试验中使用广泛调查的价值和局限性。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(5):700-718. doi: 10.1177/1049732318809940. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
Physical activity and the environment: conceptual review and framework for intervention research.身体活动与环境:概念性综述及干预研究框架
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Nov 15;14(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0610-z.
8
Ethnographic methods for process evaluations of complex health behaviour interventions.用于复杂健康行为干预过程评估的人种学方法
Trials. 2016 May 4;17(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1340-2.
9
Taking pills for developmental ails in Southern Brazil: The biologization of adolescence?在巴西南部服用治疗发育疾病的药物:青春期的生物化?
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;143:320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.028. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
10
Is there really such a thing as "one health"? Thinking about a more than human world from the perspective of cultural anthropology.真的存在“同一健康”这样的事物吗?从文化人类学的视角思考一个超越人类的世界。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;129:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
[Sociocultural factors and physical activity level in early adolescence].[社会文化因素与青少年早期的身体活动水平]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007 Oct;22(4):246-53. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892007000900004.
2
Who needs 'pukka anthropologists'? A study of the perceptions of the use of anthropology in tropical public health research.谁需要“纯正的人类学家”?一项关于热带公共卫生研究中人类学运用认知的研究。
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Aug;11(8):1264-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01669.x.
3
[Work, schooling, and reproductive health: an ethno-epidemiological study of adolescent women belonging to a birth cohort].[工作、学业与生殖健康:对某出生队列中青春期女性的民族流行病学研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2006 Jul;22(7):1459-69. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006000700010. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
4
Methodological aspects of the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study.1993年佩洛塔斯(巴西)出生队列研究的方法学方面
Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Feb;40(1):39-46. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102006000100008. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
5
Risk factors for childbearing during adolescence in a population-based birth cohort in southern Brazil.巴西南部一个基于人群的出生队列中青少年生育的风险因素。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004 Jul;16(1):1-10. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892004000700001.
6
Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials.循证公共卫生:超越随机试验
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):400-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.3.400.
7
The Pelotas birth cohort study, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 1982-2001.巴西南里奥格兰德州佩洛塔斯出生队列研究,1982 - 2001年。
Cad Saude Publica. 2003 Sep-Oct;19(5):1241-56. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2003000500003. Epub 2003 Dec 2.
8
The determinants of health: structure, context and agency.健康的决定因素:结构、背景与能动性。
Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25:131-54.
9
Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: women's resistance to social inequality.超越剖宫产分娩的简单经济学:女性对社会不平等的抵抗。
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;26(4):473-507. doi: 10.1023/a:1021730318217.
10
Making medicine for the poor: primary health care interpretations in Pelotas, Brazil.
Health Policy Plan. 2002 Jun;17(2):131-43. doi: 10.1093/heapol/17.2.131.

人类学与流行病学:通过合作项目汲取认识论教训

Anthropology and Epidemiology: learning epistemological lessons through a collaborative venture.

作者信息

Béhague Dominique Pareja, Gonçalves Helen, Victora Cesar Gomes

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cien Saude Colet. 2008 Nov-Dec;13(6):1701-10. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232008000600002.

DOI:10.1590/s1413-81232008000600002
PMID:18833344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2647662/
Abstract

Collaboration between anthropology and epidemiology has a long and tumultuous history. Based on empirical examples, this paper describes a number of epistemological lessons we have learned through our experience of cross disciplinary collaboration. Although critical of both mainstream epidemiology and medical anthropology, our analysis focuses on the implications of addressing each discipline's main epistemological differences, while addressing the goal of adopting a broader social approach to health improvement. We believe it is important to push the boundaries of research collaborations from the more standard forms of "multidisciplinarity," to the adoption of theoretically imbued "interdisciplinarity." The more we challenge epistemological limitations and modify ways of knowing, the more we will be able to provide in-depth explanations for the emergence of disease-patterns and thus, to problem-solve. In our experience, both institutional support and the adoption of a relativistic attitude are necessary conditions for sustained theoretical interdisciplinarity. Until researchers acknowledge that methodology is merely a human-designed tool to interpret reality, unnecessary methodological hyper-specialization will continue to alienate one field of knowledge from the other.

摘要

人类学与流行病学之间的合作有着漫长而波折的历史。基于实证案例,本文描述了我们通过跨学科合作经验学到的一些认识论教训。尽管我们对主流流行病学和医学人类学都持批判态度,但我们的分析重点在于解决各学科主要认识论差异的影响,同时致力于采用更广泛的社会方法来改善健康这一目标。我们认为,将研究合作的边界从更标准的“多学科性”形式拓展到采用具有理论内涵的“跨学科性”非常重要。我们对认识论局限挑战得越多,对认知方式的改变越大,就越能深入解释疾病模式的出现,进而解决问题。根据我们的经验,机构支持和采取相对主义态度是持续进行理论跨学科研究的必要条件。除非研究人员认识到方法论仅仅是一种人为设计的解释现实的工具,否则不必要的方法论过度专业化将继续使一个知识领域与另一个知识领域相疏离。