• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流感大流行期间的有效沟通:运用危机与应急风险沟通框架的价值

Effective communication during an influenza pandemic: the value of using a crisis and emergency risk communication framework.

作者信息

Reynolds Barbara, Quinn Crouse Sandra

机构信息

Office of Enterprise Communication, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2008 Oct;9(4 Suppl):13S-17S. doi: 10.1177/1524839908325267.

DOI:10.1177/1524839908325267
PMID:18936255
Abstract

During a crisis, an open and empathetic style of communication that engenders the public's trust is the most effective when officials are attempting to galvanize the population to take a positive action or refrain from a harmful act. Although trust is imperative in a crisis, public suspicions of scientific experts and government are increasing for a variety of reasons, including access to more sources of conflicting information, a reduction in the use of scientific reasoning in decision making, and political infighting. Trust and credibility--which are demonstrated through empathy and caring, competence and expertise, honesty and openness, and dedication and commitment--are essential elements of persuasive communication.

摘要

在危机期间,当官员试图激励民众采取积极行动或避免有害行为时,一种能赢得公众信任的开放且富有同理心的沟通方式最为有效。尽管在危机中信任至关重要,但由于多种原因,公众对科学专家和政府的怀疑正在增加,这些原因包括有更多相互冲突的信息来源、决策过程中科学推理的运用减少以及政治内斗。信任和公信力——通过同理心与关怀、能力与专业知识、诚实与开放以及奉献与承诺来展现——是有说服力的沟通的基本要素。

相似文献

1
Effective communication during an influenza pandemic: the value of using a crisis and emergency risk communication framework.流感大流行期间的有效沟通:运用危机与应急风险沟通框架的价值
Health Promot Pract. 2008 Oct;9(4 Suppl):13S-17S. doi: 10.1177/1524839908325267.
2
Crisis and emergency risk communication in a pandemic: a model for building capacity and resilience of minority communities.大流行中的危机与紧急风险沟通:构建少数族裔社区能力与恢复力的模式
Health Promot Pract. 2008 Oct;9(4 Suppl):18S-25S. doi: 10.1177/1524839908324022.
3
Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations.针对弱势群体进行有效的大流行性流感健康风险沟通。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Oct;99 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S324-32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537.
4
Action, not talk: a simulation of risk communication during the first hours of a pandemic.行动,而非空谈:大流行最初数小时内风险沟通的模拟
Health Promot Pract. 2008 Oct;9(4 Suppl):35S-44S. doi: 10.1177/1524839908322111.
5
The effective use of the media during an infectious disease emergency.传染病紧急情况期间媒体的有效利用。
N S W Public Health Bull. 2006 Sep-Oct;17(9-10):141. doi: 10.1071/nb06036.
6
Building trust through social media. CDC's experience during the H1N1 influenza response.通过社交媒体建立信任。美国疾病控制与预防中心在甲型H1N1流感应对期间的经验。
Mark Health Serv. 2010 Spring;30(2):18-21.
7
Legal preparation and pandemic influenza.法律准备与大流行性流感
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 May-Jun;13(3):314-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000267690.38776.50.
8
[The pandemic of the experts in the mass media. How to create trust in public communication by acknowledging ignorance and uncertainty].[大众媒体中专家的疫情。如何通过承认无知和不确定性在公共传播中建立信任]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 Jan;56(1):110-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1581-5.
9
Exploring communication, trust in government, and vaccination intention later in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic: results of a national survey.探索2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行后期的沟通、对政府的信任及疫苗接种意愿:一项全国性调查结果
Biosecur Bioterror. 2013 Jun;11(2):96-106. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0048. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
10
The challenge of providing the public with actionable information during a pandemic.在大流行病期间向公众提供可操作信息的挑战。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):630-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00695.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of communication transparency and organizational trust in publics' perceptions, attitudes and social distancing behaviour: A case study of the COVID-19 outbreak.沟通透明度和组织信任在公众认知、态度及社交距离行为中的作用:以新冠疫情为例的研究
J Conting Crisis Manag. 2021 Dec;29(4):368-384. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12354. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
2
Individual Characteristics in the Comprehension of Pandemic Video Communication: Randomized Controlled Between-Subjects Design.大流行视频通信理解中的个体特征:随机对照受试者间设计。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 4;26:e48882. doi: 10.2196/48882.
3
Parental and Adolescents' Anxiety during the COVID-19 Outbreak in Rural China: The role of Parent-child Communication.
中国农村地区新冠疫情期间家长与青少年的焦虑:亲子沟通的作用
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2024 Jan 3;17(2):657-669. doi: 10.1007/s40653-023-00609-y. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Crises information dissemination through social media in the UK and Saudi Arabia: A linguistic perspective.社交媒体在英国和沙特阿拉伯的危机信息传播:语言视角。
PLoS One. 2023 May 5;18(5):e0284857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284857. eCollection 2023.
5
Predicting Public Cooperation Toward Government Actions in the Early Stages of an Influenza Pandemic in the United States: The Role of Authentic Governmental Communication and Relational Quality.预测美国流感大流行早期公众对政府行动的合作情况:真实的政府沟通与关系质量的作用。
Communic Res. 2023 Mar;50(2):230-257. doi: 10.1177/00936502221096659. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
Evolving Face Mask Guidance During a Pandemic and Potential Harm to Public Perception: Infodemiology Study of Sentiment and Emotion on Twitter.大流行期间不断变化的口罩指南和对公众认知的潜在危害:Twitter 上情感的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 27;25:e40706. doi: 10.2196/40706.
7
COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of Academic Family Physician Leaders' Crisis Response.COVID-19:学术家庭医生领导者危机应对的定性分析。
Fam Med. 2023 Jan;55(1):38-44. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.55.421082.
8
The spring 'stay at home' coronavirus campaign communicated by pending accounts.通过待定账户传达的春季“居家抗疫”新冠病毒宣传活动。
J Pragmat. 2021 May;177:170-182. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.025. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
9
Analyzing Communication Strategies Used in Long Term Care Facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Brunswick, Canada.分析加拿大新不伦瑞克省在 COVID-19 大流行期间长期护理机构中使用的沟通策略。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221138426. doi: 10.1177/21501319221138426.
10
Longitudinal trajectories of coronavirus anxiety and health behavior use before and after the U.S. 2020 presidential election: The effects of political orientation.2020 年美国总统大选前后冠状病毒焦虑和健康行为使用的纵向轨迹:政治取向的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Dec;92:102643. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102643. Epub 2022 Oct 17.