• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

他说,她说:情景记忆提取在听觉Stroop任务中引发冲突适应。

He said, she said: episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task.

作者信息

Spapé Michiel M, Hommel Bernhard

机构信息

Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1117-21. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1117.

DOI:10.3758/PBR.15.6.1117
PMID:19001577
Abstract

People respond more slowly if an irrelevant feature of a target stimulus is incompatible with the relevant feature or the correct response. Such compatibility effects are often reduced in trials following an incompatible trial, which has been taken to reflect increased cognitive control. This pattern holds only if two trials share some similarities, however, suggesting that it may be modulated by the episodic context. To look into this possibility, we had participants respond to high- or low-pitched tones by saying "high" or "low," respectively, and ignore the simultaneously presented auditory word "high" or "low." As expected, performance was impaired if the heard word was incompatible with the required response, and this Stroop-like effect was reduced after incompatible trials. This sequential modulation was observed, however, only if the voice in the two successive trials was the same, whereas no modulation was obtained when the speaker changed. The results suggest that sequential modulations are due to the automatic retrieval of episodic event representations that integrate stimuli, actions, and situational and task-specific control information, so that later reactivation of some elements of a given representation tends to retrieve the other elements as well.

摘要

如果目标刺激的无关特征与相关特征或正确反应不相容,人们的反应会更慢。在不相容试验后的试验中,这种相容性效应通常会减弱,这被认为反映了认知控制的增强。然而,只有当两次试验有一些相似之处时,这种模式才成立,这表明它可能会受到情景背景的调节。为了探究这种可能性,我们让参与者分别通过说“高”或“低”来对高音或低音音调做出反应,并忽略同时呈现的听觉单词“高”或“低”。正如预期的那样,如果听到的单词与所需反应不相容,表现就会受损,并且这种类似斯特鲁普效应在不相容试验后会减弱。然而,只有当连续两次试验中的声音相同时,才会观察到这种顺序调节,而当说话者改变时则不会得到调节。结果表明,顺序调节是由于情景事件表征的自动检索,这些表征整合了刺激、动作以及情景和任务特定的控制信息,因此给定表征的某些元素的后续重新激活也倾向于检索其他元素。

相似文献

1
He said, she said: episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task.他说,她说:情景记忆提取在听觉Stroop任务中引发冲突适应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1117-21. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1117.
2
An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time.
Brain Lang. 1989 May;36(4):592-603. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(89)90088-6.
3
Nonconcurrently presented auditory tones reduce distraction.非同时呈现的听觉音调可减少干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr;73(3):714-9. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0064-8.
4
Compatibility-sequence effects in the Simon task reflect episodic retrieval but not conflict adaptation: evidence from LRP and N2.Simon 任务中的兼容性-序列效应反映了情节提取,而不是冲突适应:来自 LRP 和 N2 的证据。
Biol Psychol. 2011 Sep;88(1):116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
5
Reward expectation modulates multiple stages of auditory conflict control.奖励预期调节听觉冲突控制的多个阶段。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Dec;146:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
The Backward Crosstalk Effect Does Not Depend on the Degree of a Preceding Response Conflict.后向交叉效应不依赖于先前反应冲突的程度。
Exp Psychol. 2020 Sep;67(5):277-291. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000498. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
7
Sequential modulations of the Simon effect depend on episodic retrieval.序列调节的西蒙效应取决于情节检索。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 8;5:855. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00855. eCollection 2014.
8
Auditory stroop effects in children with hearing impairment.听力受损儿童的听觉斯特鲁普效应。
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Oct;36(5):1083-96. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3605.1083.
9
Activation of the caudal anterior cingulate cortex due to task-related interference in an auditory Stroop paradigm.在听觉Stroop范式中,由于任务相关干扰导致尾侧前扣带回皮层激活。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):3043-56. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20731.
10
A developmental study of the auditory Stroop effect.听觉斯特鲁普效应的发展性研究。
Brain Lang. 1988 Sep;35(1):86-104. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90102-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual dominance of the congruency sequence effect in a cross-modal context.跨模态情境下一致性序列效应的视觉优势
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1504068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504068. eCollection 2024.
2
Conflict Adaptation in Aphasia: Upregulating Cognitive Control for Improved Sentence Comprehension.失语症中的冲突适应:上调认知控制以提高句子理解能力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Nov 7;67(11):4411-4430. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00768. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
3
Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching.

本文引用的文献

1
EVENT SEGMENTATION.事件分割
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007 Apr;16(2):80-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00480.x.
2
Segmentation in the perception and memory of events.事件感知与记忆中的分段
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Feb;12(2):72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004.
3
The neural integration of speaker and message.说话者与信息的神经整合。
对任务焦点和任务切换进行认知控制的原则。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2023 Nov;2(11):702-714. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00234-4. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
4
Task-order control in dual-tasks: Only marginal interactions between conflict at lower levels and higher processes of task organization.任务转换控制中的双重任务:仅在较低层次的冲突与较高层次的任务组织过程之间存在边缘交互。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02876-9. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
One-shot stimulus-control associations generalize over different stimulus viewpoints and exemplars.一次性刺激-控制关联可在不同的刺激观点和示例中泛化。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):439-452. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01573-0. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
6
Humans do not avoid reactively implementing cognitive control.人类不会主动避免执行认知控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Jun;50(6):587-604. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001207. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
7
Binding of response-independent task rules.任务无关规则的结合。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1821-1832. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02465-9. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
8
Multimodal measures of sentence comprehension in agrammatism.失语法症的句子理解的多模态测量。
Cortex. 2023 Dec;169:309-325. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.017. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
9
Memory for abstract control states does not decay with increasing retrieval delays.对抽象控制状态的记忆不会随着检索延迟的增加而衰减。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):547-561. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01870-4. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
10
Exploring the carry-over of top-down attentional settings in dynamic conditions.探索动态条件下自上而下的注意设置的传递。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2650-2663. doi: 10.1177/17470218231155018. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Apr;20(4):580-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20054.
4
Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: two sources of sequential modulations.冲突监测与特征重叠:序列调制的两个来源。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):742-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196831.
5
Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: a computational model.项目特异性适应与冲突监测假说:一个计算模型。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):1076-86. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.1076.
6
Cognitive control acts locally.认知控制在局部起作用。
Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):1071-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011. Epub 2007 May 29.
7
Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict.反应冲突的任务特定分辨率的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):800-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03194000.
8
Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming?考虑侧翼任务中的序列试验效应:冲突适应还是联想启动?
Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1260-72. doi: 10.3758/bf03193270.
9
Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features.处理任务无关刺激特征所引发的干扰的序列调制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Jun;32(3):644-67. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.644.
10
Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task.西蒙任务中直接反应激活的门控证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):282-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196373.