• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电话交谈通过中枢瓶颈损害持续视觉注意力。

Telephone conversation impairs sustained visual attention via a central bottleneck.

作者信息

Kunar Melina A, Carter Randall, Cohen Michael, Horowitz Todd S

机构信息

University of Warwick, Coventry, England.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1135-40. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1135.

DOI:10.3758/PBR.15.6.1135
PMID:19001580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2684625/
Abstract

Recent research has shown that holding telephone conversations disrupts one's driving ability. We asked whether this effect could be attributed to a visual attention impairment. In Experiment 1, participants conversed on a telephone or listened to a narrative while engaged in multiple object tracking (MOT), a task requiring sustained visual attention. We found that MOT was disrupted in the telephone conversation condition, relative to single-task MOT performance, but that listening to a narrative had no effect. In Experiment 2, we asked which component of conversation might be interfering with MOT performance. We replicated the conversation and single-task conditions of Experiment 1 and added two conditions in which participants heard a sequence of words over a telephone. In the shadowing condition, participants simply repeated each word in the sequence. In the generation condition, participants were asked to generate a new word based on each word in the sequence. Word generation interfered with MOT performance, but shadowing did not. The data indicate that telephone conversation disrupts attention at a central stage, the act of generating verbal stimuli, rather than at a peripheral stage, such as listening or speaking.

摘要

最近的研究表明,进行电话交谈会干扰人的驾驶能力。我们探讨了这种影响是否可归因于视觉注意力受损。在实验1中,参与者在进行多目标跟踪(MOT,一项需要持续视觉注意力的任务)时进行电话交谈或听一段叙述。我们发现,相对于单任务MOT表现,在电话交谈条件下MOT受到了干扰,但听一段叙述则没有影响。在实验2中,我们探究了交谈的哪个部分可能会干扰MOT表现。我们重复了实验1中的交谈和单任务条件,并增加了两个条件,即参与者通过电话听到一系列单词。在跟读条件下,参与者只需重复序列中的每个单词。在生成条件下,参与者被要求根据序列中的每个单词生成一个新单词。单词生成干扰了MOT表现,但跟读没有。数据表明,电话交谈在中枢阶段(即生成言语刺激的行为)而非外周阶段(如听或说)干扰注意力。

相似文献

1
Telephone conversation impairs sustained visual attention via a central bottleneck.电话交谈通过中枢瓶颈损害持续视觉注意力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1135-40. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1135.
2
Driven to distraction: dual-Task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone.注意力分散:模拟驾驶与使用手机通话的双重任务研究。
Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;12(6):462-6. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00386.
3
It is not good to talk: conversation has a fixed interference cost on attention regardless of difficulty.说话是不好的:无论难度如何,交谈对注意力都有固定的干扰成本。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Aug 22;3:33. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0124-5. eCollection 2018 Dec.
4
Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.对单个对象做出两种反应:对中央注意力瓶颈的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1058-79. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1058.
5
Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene: fMRI analysis and asynchrony model.观看驾驶场景时对话对视觉事件反应时间背后神经机制的影响:功能磁共振成像分析与异步模型
Brain Res. 2009 Jan 28;1251:162-75. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
6
Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence.重复很容易:为什么重复的指称物的突出程度降低了。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):1137-46. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1137.
7
Attentional demands of visual word recognition.视觉单词识别的注意力需求。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Feb;15(1):124-32. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.124.
8
If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.如果你说“thee uh”,你是在描述一些困难的事情:指代理解过程中不流畅的在线归因。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):914-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914.
9
Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene using MEG.使用脑磁图(MEG)观察驾驶场景时,对话对视觉事件反应时间背后神经机制的影响。
Brain Res. 2009 Jan 28;1251:151-61. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
10
The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.视觉-听觉颜色词斯特鲁普不对称性及其时间进程。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1325-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03193365.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention in post-lexical processes of utterance production: Dual-task cost in younger and older adults.话语产生的词后加工过程中的注意:年轻成年人和老年成年人的双重任务代价。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1852-1872. doi: 10.1177/17470218211034130. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
2
A critical systematic review of the Neurotracker perceptual-cognitive training tool.神经追踪器感知认知训练工具的关键性系统评价
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct;28(5):1458-1483. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01892-2. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
3
The Effect of Cognitive Load on Auditory Susceptibility During Automated Driving.认知负荷对自动驾驶中听觉敏感性的影响。
Hum Factors. 2022 Nov;64(7):1195-1209. doi: 10.1177/0018720821998850. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
4
Effect of bilingualism on visual tracking attention and resistance to distraction.双语对视觉追踪注意力和抗干扰能力的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 31;10(1):14263. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71185-6.
5
How Do Humans Perform in Multiple Object Tracking With Unstable Features.人类在具有不稳定特征的多目标跟踪任务中的表现如何。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 31;11:1940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01940. eCollection 2020.
6
Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing.持续的、偏侧化听觉刺激影响视觉空间加工。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 12;11:1183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01183. eCollection 2020.
7
Examining the roles of working memory and visual attention in multiple object tracking expertise.探究工作记忆和视觉注意力在多目标追踪专业技能中的作用。
Cogn Process. 2020 May;21(2):209-222. doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00954-y. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
8
The hazards of perception: evaluating a change blindness demonstration within a real-world driver education course.感知的危害:在现实世界的驾驶员教育课程中评估变化盲视演示。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 May 21;4(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0165-4.
9
Interference in speaking while hearing and vice versa.听时说话和说时听的相互干扰。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 29;9(1):5375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41752-7.
10
It is not good to talk: conversation has a fixed interference cost on attention regardless of difficulty.说话是不好的:无论难度如何,交谈对注意力都有固定的干扰成本。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Aug 22;3:33. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0124-5. eCollection 2018 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
2
Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking.多目标跟踪过程中基于需求的注意力动态分配与速度监测
J Vis. 2009 Apr 3;9(4):1.1-12. doi: 10.1167/9.4.1.
3
Multiple object juggling: changing what is tracked during extended multiple object tracking.多目标 juggling:在扩展的多目标跟踪过程中改变被跟踪的对象。 (注:“juggling”常见释义为“杂耍”,这里结合语境灵活翻译为“juggling”,整体意思可理解为在多目标跟踪中对跟踪对象进行某种动态调整,类似杂耍般的操作。)
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):344-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03194075.
4
Tracking unique objects.追踪独特物体。
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Feb;69(2):172-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03193740.
5
Multiple-target tracking: A role for working memory?多目标跟踪:工作记忆的作用?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jun;59(6):1101-16. doi: 10.1080/02724980543000097.
6
A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver.手机驾驶员与醉酒驾驶员的比较。
Hum Factors. 2006 Summer;48(2):381-91. doi: 10.1518/001872006777724471.
7
Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms.注意力和工作记忆的不同容量限制:来自注意力追踪和视觉工作记忆范式的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;17(6):526-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01739.x.
8
Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?驾驶中的中枢干扰:心理不应期是否无法避免?
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):228-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01690.x.
9
Do multielement visual tracking and visual search draw continuously on the same visual attention resources?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Aug;31(4):643-67. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.643a.
10
Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention.通过多焦点注意力追踪多个目标。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul;9(7):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.009.