Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Istituto di Ricerca Genetica e Biomedica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, c/o Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;88(4):1651-1661. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220400.
Few studies have examined the associations between personality facets and dementia risk and rarely included individuals from rural settings or with low education.
To examine the association between personality and the risk of cognitive impairment.
Participants (N = 1,668; age 50 to 94 at baseline; 56.4% women; 86.5% less than high school diploma) were from a rural region of Sardinia (Italy) who completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) during the first wave (2001-2004) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at waves two to five (2005-2021). Cox regression was used to test personality and covariates as predictors of cognitive impairment based on MMSE education-adjusted cutoffs.
During the up to 18-year follow-up (M = 10.38; SD = 4.76), 187 individuals (11.2%) scored as cognitively impaired. Participants with higher neuroticism (particularly the depression facet [HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.06-1.40]), and lower agreeableness (particularly the modesty facet [HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71-0.97]) and lower conscientiousness (particularly the dutifulness facet [HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.92]) were at higher risk of cognitive impairment. Lower warmth ([HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.65-0.87], facet of extraversion) and ideas ([HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65-0.89], facet of openness) were also associated with increased risk of impairment. These associations were virtually unchanged in models that accounted for other risk factors, including smoking, depression, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) ɛ4 carrier status. Across the five domains, sex and the APOE variant did not moderate the associations.
In a sample with demographic characteristics underrepresented in dementia research, this study identifies personality domains and facets most relevant to the risk of cognitive impairment.
很少有研究探讨人格特质与痴呆风险之间的关系,且很少有研究纳入来自农村地区或受教育程度较低的个体。
研究人格特质与认知障碍风险之间的关系。
参与者(N=1668;基线时年龄为 50-94 岁;56.4%为女性;86.5%未完成高中学业)来自撒丁岛(意大利)的一个农村地区,他们在第 1 波(2001-2004 年)期间完成了修订版大五人格量表(NEO-PI-R),并在第 2-5 波(2005-2021 年)期间完成了简易精神状态检查(MMSE)。采用 Cox 回归检验人格特质和协变量是否可以预测基于 MMSE 教育校正切点的认知障碍。
在长达 18 年的随访期间(M=10.38;SD=4.76),有 187 人(11.2%)被诊断为认知障碍。神经质得分较高(尤其是抑郁因子[HR=1.22,95%CI=1.06-1.40])、宜人性得分较低(尤其是谦逊因子[HR=0.83,95%CI=0.71-0.97])和尽责性得分较低(尤其是尽职因子[HR=0.78,95%CI=0.67-0.92])的参与者发生认知障碍的风险更高。较低的热情([HR=0.75,95%CI=0.65-0.87],外向性的一个因子)和想法([HR=0.76,95%CI=0.65-0.89],开放性的一个因子)也与认知障碍风险增加相关。在考虑了其他风险因素(包括吸烟、抑郁、肥胖、高血压、糖尿病和载脂蛋白 E(APOE)ɛ4 等位基因)的模型中,这些关联几乎没有变化。在五个领域中,性别和 APOE 变体均不能调节这些关联。
在一个具有痴呆症研究代表性不足的人口统计学特征的样本中,本研究确定了与认知障碍风险最相关的人格领域和特质。