• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病例报告:使用SNOMED CT对药品不良反应术语进行分组

A case report: using SNOMED CT for grouping Adverse Drug Reactions Terms.

作者信息

Alecu Iulian, Bousquet Cedric, Jaulent Marie-Christine

机构信息

Université Paris Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, Inserm, U729, SPIM, Paris, 75006 France.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Oct 27;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-S1-S4.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-8-S1-S4
PMID:19007441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2582791/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

WHO-ART and MedDRA are medical terminologies used for the coding of adverse drug reactions in pharmacovigilance databases. MedDRA proposes 13 Special Search Categories (SSC) grouping terms associated to specific medical conditions. For instance, the SSC "Haemorrhage" includes 346 MedDRA terms among which 55 are also WHO-ART terms. WHO-ART itself does not provide such groupings. Our main contention is the possibility of classifying WHO-ART terms in semantic categories by using knowledge extracted from SNOMED CT. A previous paper presents the way WHO-ART term definitions have been automatically generated in a description logics formalism by using their corresponding SNOMED CT synonyms. Based on synonymy and relative position of WHO-ART terms in SNOMED CT, specialization or generalization relationships could be inferred. This strategy is successful for grouping the WHO-ART terms present in most MedDRA SSCs. However the strategy failed when SSC were organized on other basis than taxonomy.

METHODS

We propose a new method that improves the previous WHO-ART structure by integrating the associative relationships included in SNOMED CT.

RESULTS

The new method improves the groupings. For example, none of the 55 WHO-ART terms in the Haemorrhage SSC were matched using the previous method. With the new method, we improve the groupings and obtain 87% coverage of the Haemorrhage SSC.

CONCLUSION

SNOMED CT's terminological structure can be used to perform automated groupings in WHO-ART. This work proves that groupings already present in the MedDRA SSCs (e.g. the haemorrhage SSC) may be retrieved using classification in SNOMED CT.

摘要

背景

WHO-ART和MedDRA是用于药物警戒数据库中药物不良反应编码的医学术语。MedDRA提出了13个特殊搜索类别(SSC),将与特定医疗状况相关的术语进行分组。例如,“出血”这一特殊搜索类别包含346个MedDRA术语,其中55个也是WHO-ART术语。而WHO-ART本身并未提供此类分组。我们的主要观点是利用从SNOMED CT中提取的知识将WHO-ART术语分类到语义类别中的可能性。之前的一篇论文介绍了通过使用相应的SNOMED CT同义词以描述逻辑形式自动生成WHO-ART术语定义的方法。基于WHO-ART术语在SNOMED CT中的同义关系和相对位置,可以推断出专门化或泛化关系。该策略成功地对大多数MedDRA特殊搜索类别中的WHO-ART术语进行了分组。然而,当特殊搜索类别不是基于分类法组织时,该策略就会失败。

方法

我们提出了一种新方法,通过整合SNOMED CT中包含的关联关系来改进先前的WHO-ART结构。

结果

新方法改进了分组。例如,使用先前的方法,出血特殊搜索类别中的55个WHO-ART术语均未匹配成功。采用新方法,我们改进了分组,并实现了对出血特殊搜索类别87%的覆盖。

结论

SNOMED CT的术语结构可用于在WHO-ART中进行自动分组。这项工作证明,MedDRA特殊搜索类别中已有的分组(如出血特殊搜索类别)可以通过在SNOMED CT中进行分类来检索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2421/2582791/5119adddb6b4/1472-6947-8-S1-S4-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2421/2582791/2f7d030222f2/1472-6947-8-S1-S4-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2421/2582791/5119adddb6b4/1472-6947-8-S1-S4-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2421/2582791/2f7d030222f2/1472-6947-8-S1-S4-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2421/2582791/5119adddb6b4/1472-6947-8-S1-S4-2.jpg

相似文献

1
A case report: using SNOMED CT for grouping Adverse Drug Reactions Terms.病例报告:使用SNOMED CT对药品不良反应术语进行分组
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Oct 27;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-S1-S4.
2
Mapping of the WHO-ART terminology on Snomed CT to improve grouping of related adverse drug reactions.将世界卫生组织药物不良反应术语集(WHO-ART)映射到医学系统命名法临床术语(Snomed CT)以改进相关药品不良反应的分组
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:833-8.
3
Using SNOMED CT in combination with MedDRA for reporting signal detection and adverse drug reactions reporting.结合使用SNOMED CT和MedDRA进行信号检测报告及药物不良反应报告。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:45-9.
4
Formalizing MedDRA to support semantic reasoning on adverse drug reaction terms.规范医学术语词典(MedDRA)以支持对药品不良反应术语进行语义推理。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Jun;49:282-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
5
OntoADR a semantic resource describing adverse drug reactions to support searching, coding, and information retrieval.OntoADR是一种描述药物不良反应的语义资源,用于支持搜索、编码和信息检索。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Oct;63:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
Determining correspondences between high-frequency MedDRA concepts and SNOMED: a case study.确定 MedDRA 高频概念与 SNOMED 的对应关系:案例研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Oct 28;10:66. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-66.
7
Ontological and Non-Ontological Resources for Associating Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Terms to SNOMED Clinical Terms With Semantic Properties.用于将监管活动医学词典术语与具有语义属性的SNOMED临床术语相关联的本体论和非本体论资源。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 10;10:975. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00975. eCollection 2019.
8
[Automated grouping of terms associated to cardiac valve fibrosis in MedDRA].[医学术语词典(MedDRA)中与心脏瓣膜纤维化相关术语的自动分组]
Therapie. 2016 Dec;71(6):541-552. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
9
Appraisal of the MedDRA conceptual structure for describing and grouping adverse drug reactions.对用于描述和分组药品不良反应的医学术语词典(MedDRA)概念结构的评估。
Drug Saf. 2005;28(1):19-34. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528010-00002.
10
MedDRA® automated term groupings using OntoADR: evaluation with upper gastrointestinal bleedings.使用OntoADR进行的MedDRA®自动术语分组:以上消化道出血为例的评估
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016 Sep;15(9):1153-61. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1206075. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a SNOMED CT-Based Value Set to Document Symptoms and Diagnoses for Adverse Drug Events: Mixed Methods Study.开发基于SNOMED CT的价值集以记录药品不良事件的症状和诊断:混合方法研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 8;13:e70167. doi: 10.2196/70167.
2
Ontological and Non-Ontological Resources for Associating Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Terms to SNOMED Clinical Terms With Semantic Properties.用于将监管活动医学词典术语与具有语义属性的SNOMED临床术语相关联的本体论和非本体论资源。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 10;10:975. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00975. eCollection 2019.
3
Computational Advances in Drug Safety: Systematic and Mapping Review of Knowledge Engineering Based Approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating SNOMED CT into the UMLS: an exploration of different views of synonymy and quality of editing.将SNOMED CT整合到统一医学语言系统(UMLS)中:对同义词不同观点及编辑质量的探索。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):486-94. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1767. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
2
Appraisal of the MedDRA conceptual structure for describing and grouping adverse drug reactions.对用于描述和分组药品不良反应的医学术语词典(MedDRA)概念结构的评估。
Drug Saf. 2005;28(1):19-34. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528010-00002.
3
Effects of coding dictionary on signal generation: a consideration of use of MedDRA compared with WHO-ART.
药物安全性的计算进展:基于知识工程方法的系统综述与图谱综述
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 17;10:415. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00415. eCollection 2019.
4
Knowledge Discovery from Posts in Online Health Communities Using Unified Medical Language System.利用统一医学语言系统从在线健康社区的帖子中发现知识。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 19;15(6):1291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061291.
5
Exploitation of semantic methods to cluster pharmacovigilance terms.利用语义方法对药物警戒术语进行聚类。
J Biomed Semantics. 2014 Apr 16;5:18. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-18. eCollection 2014.
6
Identifying inconsistencies in SNOMED CT problem lists using structural indicators.使用结构指标识别SNOMED CT问题列表中的不一致性。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:17-26. eCollection 2013.
7
Mining FDA drug labels for medical conditions.从 FDA 药物标签中挖掘医疗条件信息。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 24;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-53.
8
Identification of fever and vaccine-associated gene interaction networks using ontology-based literature mining.使用基于本体的文献挖掘识别发热与疫苗相关基因相互作用网络。
J Biomed Semantics. 2012 Dec 20;3(1):18. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-3-18.
9
Comparison of Knowledge Levels Required for SNOMED CT Coding of Diagnosis and Operation Names in Clinical Records.临床记录中诊断和手术名称的SNOMED CT编码所需知识水平的比较。
Healthc Inform Res. 2012 Sep;18(3):186-90. doi: 10.4258/hir.2012.18.3.186. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
10
Comparative analysis of the VA/Kaiser and NLM CORE problem subsets: an empirical study based on problem frequency.退伍军人事务部/凯撒医疗集团与美国国立医学图书馆核心问题子集的对比分析:一项基于问题频率的实证研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1532-40. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
编码字典对信号生成的影响:比较使用MedDRA与WHO-ART的考量
Drug Saf. 2002;25(6):445-52. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225060-00009.
4
The use of a medical dictionary for regulatory activities terminology (MedDRA) in prescription-event monitoring in Japan (J-PEM).日本处方事件监测(J-PEM)中用于监管活动术语的医学词典(MedDRA)的使用。
Int J Med Inform. 2000 Jul;57(2-3):139-53. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(00)00062-9.
5
Compositional concept representation using SNOMED: towards further convergence of clinical terminologies.使用SNOMED的成分概念表示法:迈向临床术语的进一步融合
Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:740-4.
6
Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century.21世纪受控医学词汇的必备条件。
Methods Inf Med. 1998 Nov;37(4-5):394-403.
7
Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse.知识共享与重用的维度
Comput Biomed Res. 1992 Oct;25(5):435-67. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(92)90003-s.