Wiesner Margit, Capaldi Deborah M, Kim Hyoun K
University of Houston.
Criminology. 2007 Nov;45(4):835-863. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00099.x.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of different operationalizations of offending behavior on the identified trajectories of offending, and to relate findings to hypothesized dual taxonomy models. Prior research with 203 young men from the Oregon Youth Study identified six offender pathways, based on self-report data (Wiesner and Capaldi, 2003). The present study used official records data (number of arrests) for the same sample. Semiparametric group-based modeling indicated three distinctive arrest trajectories: high-level chronics, low-level chronics, and rare offenders. Both chronic arrest trajectory groups were characterized by relatively equal rates of early onset offenders, thus indicating some divergence from hypothesized dual taxonomies. Overall, this study demonstrated limited convergence of trajectory findings across official records versus self-report measures of offending behavior.
本研究的目的是评估犯罪行为的不同操作化对所确定的犯罪轨迹的影响,并将研究结果与假设的双重分类模型联系起来。先前对来自俄勒冈州青少年研究的203名年轻男性的研究,基于自我报告数据确定了六种犯罪途径(维斯纳和卡帕尔迪,2003年)。本研究使用了同一样本的官方记录数据(逮捕次数)。基于半参数组的建模表明存在三种不同的逮捕轨迹:高频率惯犯、低频率惯犯和偶发犯罪者。两个惯犯逮捕轨迹组的特点都是早期犯罪者的比例相对相等,因此表明与假设的双重分类存在一些差异。总体而言,本研究表明,在官方记录与犯罪行为的自我报告测量之间,轨迹研究结果的一致性有限。