Suppr超能文献

儿童、青少年和成人食物过敏生活质量问卷(FAQLQ)的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ) for children, adolescents and adults.

作者信息

van der Velde Jantina L, Flokstra-de Blok Bertine M J, Vlieg-Boerstra Berber J, Oude Elberink Joanne N G, Schouten Jan P, Dunngalvin Audrey, Hourihane Jonathan O'B, Duiverman Eric J, Dubois Anthony E J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2009 Mar;18(2):245-51. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9434-2. Epub 2009 Jan 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The self-administered Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire-Child Form (FAQLQ-CF), -Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF) and -Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF) were recently developed within EuroPrevall, a multi-centred study of food allergy in Europe. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the FAQLQ-CF, -TF and -AF.

METHODS

One hundred and one Dutch patients (31 children, 34 adolescents and 36 adults) completed the FAQLQ twice with a 10-14 day interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability was excellent with ICCs and CCCs above 0.907, 0.975 and 0.951 for the FAQLQ-CF, -TF and -AF, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed that the mean differences of the test and re-test were all close to zero for the FAQLQs.

CONCLUSIONS

The FAQLQs are reliable over a short time interval. The FAQLQs are not only excellent tools for group comparison studies, but also for monitoring individual patients.

摘要

目的

自我管理的食物过敏生活质量问卷儿童版(FAQLQ-CF)、青少年版(FAQLQ-TF)和成人版(FAQLQ-AF)是近期在欧洲食物过敏多中心研究EuroPrevall中开发的。本研究的主要目的是评估FAQLQ-CF、-TF和-AF的重测信度。

方法

101名荷兰患者(31名儿童、34名青少年和36名成人)间隔10 - 14天完成两次FAQLQ问卷。组内相关系数(ICC)、林氏一致性相关系数(CCC)和布兰德-奥特曼图用于评估重测信度。

结果

重测信度极佳,FAQLQ-CF、-TF和-AF的ICC和CCC分别高于0.907、0.975和0.951。布兰德-奥特曼图显示,FAQLQ问卷的测试和重测平均差异均接近零。

结论

FAQLQ在短时间间隔内是可靠的。FAQLQ不仅是群体比较研究的优秀工具,也是监测个体患者的优秀工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验