Boniotti M Beatrice, Goria Maria, Loda Daniela, Garrone Annalisa, Benedetto Alessandro, Mondo Alessandra, Tisato Ernesto, Zanoni Mariagrazia, Zoppi Simona, Dondo Alessandro, Tagliabue Silvia, Bonora Stefano, Zanardi Giorgio, Pacciarini M Lodovica
Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Lombardia e Emilia-Romagna, Via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Mar;47(3):636-44. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01192-08. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
Spoligotyping and exact tandem repeat (ETR) analysis of Mycobacterium bovis and M. caprae isolated strains has been routinely carried out in Italy since 2000 to obtain a database of genetic profiles and support traditional epidemiological investigations. In this study, we characterized 1,503 M. bovis and 57 M. caprae isolates obtained from 2000 to 2006 in 747 cattle herds mainly located in northern Italy. We identified 81 spoligotypes and 113 ETR profiles, while the combination of spoligotyping/ETR analysis differentiated 228 genotypes, with genotypic diversity indices of 0.70 (spoligotyping), 0.94 (ETR-A to -E typing), and 0.97 (spoligotyping/ETR-A to -E typing), respectively. Despite the high degree of resolution obtained, the spoligotyping/ETR methods were not discriminative enough in the case of genotypes characterized by the combination of SB0120, the predominant spoligotype in Italy, with the most common ETR profiles. To obtain a more informative subset of typing loci, 24 mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) markers were evaluated by analyzing a panel of 100 epidemiologically unrelated SB0120 isolates. The panel was differentiated into 89 profiles with an overall genotypic diversity of 0.987 that could be also achieved by using a minimal group of 13 loci: ETR-A, -B, and -E; MIRU 26 and 40; and VNTR 2163a, 2163b, 3155, 1612, 4052, 1895, 3232, and 3336. The allelic diversity index and the stability of single loci was evaluated to provide the most discriminative genotyping method for locally prevalent strains.
自2000年以来,意大利常规开展牛分枝杆菌和山羊分枝杆菌分离株的间隔寡核苷酸分型(Spoligotyping)及精确串联重复序列(ETR)分析,以获取遗传图谱数据库并支持传统的流行病学调查。在本研究中,我们对2000年至2006年期间从意大利北部747个牛群中分离得到的1503株牛分枝杆菌和57株山羊分枝杆菌进行了特征分析。我们鉴定出81种间隔寡核苷酸分型和113种ETR图谱,而间隔寡核苷酸分型/ETR分析的组合区分出228种基因型,其基因型多样性指数分别为0.70(间隔寡核苷酸分型)、0.94(ETR-A至-E分型)和0.97(间隔寡核苷酸分型/ETR-A至-E分型)。尽管获得了高度的分辨率,但在以意大利主要的间隔寡核苷酸分型SB0120与最常见的ETR图谱组合为特征的基因型情况下,间隔寡核苷酸分型/ETR方法的区分能力仍不够强。为了获得更具信息性的分型位点子集,通过分析一组100株流行病学上无关的SB0120分离株,对24个分枝杆菌散布重复单位可变数目串联重复序列(MIRU-VNTR)标记进行了评估。该组被分为89种图谱,总体基因型多样性为0.