Derose Kathryn Pitkin, Varda Danielle M
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Jun;66(3):272-306. doi: 10.1177/1077558708330428. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
There is a growing interest in community-level characteristics such as social capital and its relationship to health care access. To assess the rigor with which this construct has been empirically applied in research on health care access, a systematic review was conducted. A total of 2,396 abstracts were reviewed, and 21 met the criteria of examining some measure of social capital and its effects on health care access. The review found a lack of congruence in how social capital was measured and interpreted and a general inconsistency in findings, which made it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effects of social capital on health care access. Insights from the social network literature can help improve the conceptual and measurement problems. Future work should distinguish among bonding, bridging, and linking social capital and their sources and benefits, and examine whether three dimensions of social capital actually exist: cognitive, behavioral, and structural.
人们对社区层面的特征(如社会资本)及其与医疗保健可及性的关系越来越感兴趣。为了评估这一概念在医疗保健可及性研究中的实证应用严谨程度,我们进行了一项系统综述。共审查了2396篇摘要,其中21篇符合研究社会资本的某种衡量标准及其对医疗保健可及性影响的标准。该综述发现,在社会资本的衡量和解释方式上缺乏一致性,研究结果普遍不一致,这使得难以就社会资本对医疗保健可及性的影响得出确凿结论。社会网络文献的见解有助于改善概念和测量问题。未来的研究应区分关系型、桥接型和连接型社会资本及其来源和益处,并研究社会资本的认知、行为和结构这三个维度是否实际存在。