The challenge of selection bias and confounding in palliative care research.
作者信息
Starks Helene, Diehr Paula, Curtis J Randall
机构信息
Department of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7120, USA.
出版信息
J Palliat Med. 2009 Feb;12(2):181-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.9672.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The challenge of selection bias and confounding in palliative care research.姑息治疗研究中选择偏倚和混杂因素的挑战。
J Palliat Med. 2009 Feb;12(2):181-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.9672.
2
When and how to use instrumental variables in palliative care research.何时以及如何在姑息治疗研究中使用工具变量。
J Palliat Med. 2009 May;12(5):471-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.9631.
3
Beyond Confounding: Identifying Selection Bias in Observational Pulmonary and Critical Care Research.超越混杂因素：识别观察性肺部和重症医学研究中的选择偏倚
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Jul;19(7):1084-1089. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202110-1188PS.
4
Definitions of Bias in Clinical Research.临床研究中的偏倚定义。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:35-52. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_3.
5
Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.比较效果研究中选择偏倚与混杂偏倚的辨别
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):e23-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000011.
6
Inviting parents to take part in paediatric palliative care research: a mixed-methods examination of selection bias.邀请父母参与儿科姑息治疗研究：对选择偏倚的混合方法研究
Palliat Med. 2015 Mar;29(3):231-40. doi: 10.1177/0269216314560803. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
7
Bias in Clinical Research.临床研究中的偏倚。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:17-34. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_2.
8
Bounding formulas for selection bias.选择偏倚的界值公式。
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 15;182(10):868-72. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv130. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
9
Multiple-bias Sensitivity Analysis Using Bounds.基于界的多重偏差敏感性分析。
Epidemiology. 2021 Sep 1;32(5):625-634. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001380.
10
[On 'Negative control methods': related principles, methods and applications].[关于“阴性对照方法”：相关原理、方法及应用]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 10;41(4):594-598. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20191109-00796.
引用本文的文献
1
Parent-of-Origin Effects in Childhood Asthma at Seven Years of Age.七岁儿童哮喘的亲本来源效应
Genet Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;49(3):e70007. doi: 10.1002/gepi.70007.
2
Evaluation of Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems to support advance care planning for people living with life-threatening conditions (PREPARE): protocol for a multicentre observational study using routinely collected primary and secondary care data in England.评估电子姑息治疗协调系统以支持危及生命疾病患者的预立医疗计划（PREPARE）：一项在英格兰使用常规收集的初级和二级医疗数据的多中心观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e093175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093175.
3
What Type of Self-Assessment Is Best for Your Educational Activity? A Review of Pre-Post, Now-Then, and Post-Only Designs.哪种自我评估最适合你的教育活动？对前后测、现在与过去对比以及仅后测设计的综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1010-1015. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09176-w. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
4
End-of-Life Symptom Burden among Patients with Cancer Who Were Provided Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID): A Longitudinal Propensity-Score-Matched Cohort Study.接受医疗协助死亡（MAID）的癌症患者临终症状负担：一项纵向倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;16(7):1294. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071294.
5
Evaluating photodynamic therapy versus brolucizumab as a second-line treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.评估光动力疗法与布罗珠单抗作为息肉样脉络膜血管病变二线治疗方法的疗效。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024 Apr 8;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40942-024-00553-5.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of palliative care in natural experiments: a systematic review.自然实验中姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益：一项系统评价。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Jan 17. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003993.
7
Analysis of English general practice level data linking medication levels, service activity and demography to levels of glycaemic control being achieved in type 2 diabetes to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes.分析英国全科医疗水平数据，该数据将药物水平、服务活动和人口统计学与2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制水平相联系，以改善临床实践和患者治疗效果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e028278. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028278.
8
Naproxen for the treatment of neoplastic fever: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.萘普生治疗肿瘤热：一项遵循PRISMA规范的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15840. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015840.
9
The Role of Resilience in the Sibling Experience of Pediatric Palliative Care: What Is the Theory and Evidence?韧性在儿童姑息治疗的手足经历中的作用：理论与证据是什么？
Children (Basel). 2018 Jul 16;5(7):97. doi: 10.3390/children5070097.
10
Sulfonylurea for the treatment of neonatal diabetes owing to K-channel mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于治疗由钾通道突变引起的新生儿糖尿病的磺脲类药物：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 20;8(64):108274-108285. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22548. eCollection 2017 Dec 8.
本文引用的文献
1
When and how to use instrumental variables in palliative care research.何时以及如何在姑息治疗研究中使用工具变量。
J Palliat Med. 2009 May;12(5):471-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.9631.
2
User's guide to research in palliative care: why is a new series needed?姑息治疗研究用户指南：为何需要新系列？
J Palliat Med. 2008 Nov;11(9):1258-61. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.9831.
3
Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs.美国医院姑息治疗咨询项目相关的成本节约
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 8;168(16):1783-90. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1783.
4
Integrating palliative and critical care: evaluation of a quality-improvement intervention.整合姑息治疗与重症监护：一项质量改进干预措施的评估
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug 1;178(3):269-75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200802-272OC. Epub 2008 May 14.
5
Adjunctive nabilone in cancer pain and symptom management: a prospective observational study using propensity scoring.辅助性大麻隆用于癌症疼痛和症状管理：一项使用倾向评分的前瞻性观察研究。
J Support Oncol. 2008 Mar;6(3):119-24.
6
Hospice effect on government expenditures among nursing home residents.临终关怀对养老院居民政府支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):134-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00746.x.
7
Do palliative consultations improve patient outcomes?姑息治疗会诊能否改善患者预后？
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Apr;56(4):593-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01610.x. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
8
Characterizing hospice discharge patterns in a nationally representative sample of the elderly, 1993-2000.对1993 - 2000年全国具有代表性的老年人临终关怀出院模式进行特征描述。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008 Feb-Mar;25(1):9-15. doi: 10.1177/1049909107310136. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
9
What length of hospice use maximizes reduction in medical expenditures near death in the US Medicare program?在美国医疗保险计划中，临终关怀使用多长时间能最大程度降低临近死亡时的医疗支出？
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Oct;65(7):1466-78. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.028. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
10
Perceptual consistency of pain and quality of life between hospice cancer patients and family caregivers: a pilot study.临终关怀癌症患者与家庭照顾者之间疼痛的感知一致性和生活质量：一项试点研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;61(10):1686-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01347.x. Epub 2007 May 30.
Zotero 插件