经验主义伦理学及其所谓的元伦理谬误。
Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical fallacies.
作者信息
de Vries Rob, Gordijn Bert
机构信息
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, IQ Healthcare, Section Ethics, Philosophy & History of Medicine, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Bioethics. 2009 May;23(4):193-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01710.x.
Abstract
This paper analyses the concept of empirical ethics as well as three meta-ethical fallacies that empirical ethics is said to face: the is-ought problem, the naturalistic fallacy and violation of the fact-value distinction. Moreover, it answers the question of whether empirical ethics (necessarily) commits these three basic meta-ethical fallacies.
摘要
本文分析了实证伦理学的概念以及据说实证伦理学所面临的三个元伦理学谬误
是-应当问题、自然主义谬误以及对事实-价值区分的违背。此外，它还回答了实证伦理学是否（必然）犯有这三个基本元伦理学谬误的问题。
Zotero 插件