Hepato pancreatico biliary Unit, Surgical Academic Unit, F Level Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2743-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0499-y. Epub 2009 May 22.
Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery has been slow to gain wide acceptance due to the complex pancreatic anatomy and physiology. The aim of this study was to analyze our preliminary results and highlight the impact of centralization on surgeon workload and pancreatic surgical innovation.
A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy from May 2007 to October 2008.
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was performed in 17 patients during that period. Median operative time was 180 min (range 120-300 min). Median blood loss was 100 ml (range 50-500 ml). Splenectomy was performed in 12 patients. None of the patients was converted to open operation. All patients were kept in high-dependency unit for median duration of 1 day (range 0-1 day). One patient with previous cardiac disease was kept in intensive therapy unit for one night, but discharged home on 7th postoperative day without any complications. Postoperative recovery was uneventful in 13 patients, while four patients had pancreatic leak. One pancreatic leak was observed in the last 11 patients, in which pancreatic stump was oversewn. In three patients, pancreatic leaks (PL) were minor and settled with conservative management, while one patient needed a computed tomography (CT)-guided drainage and subsequent minilaparotomy for wash out of the intra abdominal collection. None of the patients died in this series. Median hospital stay was 5 days (range 4-7 days).
Laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection is feasible, safe, and efficient. However, this surgery should only be performed in specialized centres with extensive experience in pancreatic and laparoscopic surgery. Oversewing the pancreatic stump after transaction with Endostapler may reduce the incidence of pancreatic leak. Centralization of pancreatic surgery has a positive impact on building up surgical expertise, resulting in obvious benefits for both patients and institutions.
由于胰腺解剖和生理学复杂,腹腔镜胰腺手术一直难以广泛接受。本研究旨在分析我们的初步结果,并强调集中化对外科医生工作量和胰腺外科创新的影响。
对 2007 年 5 月至 2008 年 10 月期间所有接受腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。
在此期间,17 例患者接受了腹腔镜胰体尾切除术。中位手术时间为 180 分钟(范围 120-300 分钟)。中位出血量为 100 毫升(范围 50-500 毫升)。12 例患者行脾切除术。无患者转为开放手术。所有患者均在高依赖病房停留中位数 1 天(范围 0-1 天)。1 例有既往心脏病史的患者在重症监护病房停留 1 晚,但术后第 7 天无并发症出院回家。13 例患者术后恢复顺利,4 例患者发生胰漏。最后 11 例患者中观察到 1 例胰漏,其中胰残端被缝合。3 例胰漏较小,经保守治疗解决,1 例患者需要 CT 引导引流和随后的小剖腹术冲洗腹腔内积液。本系列无患者死亡。中位住院时间为 5 天(范围 4-7 天)。
腹腔镜胰体尾切除术是可行、安全和有效的。然而,这种手术只能在具有丰富胰腺和腹腔镜手术经验的专业中心进行。使用 Endostapler 处理胰残端后缝合可能会降低胰漏的发生率。胰腺手术的集中化对建立外科专业知识有积极影响,对患者和机构都有明显的益处。