• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

What factors explain racial differences in lung volumes?

作者信息

Donnelly P M, Yang T S, Peat J K, Woolcock A J

机构信息

Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1991 Jul;4(7):829-38.

PMID:1955006
Abstract

In order to examine the physical characteristics that may determine racial differences in lung volumes, we studied healthy, nonsmoking Caucasian, Chinese and Indian males of similar ages (range 18-51 yrs). We measured spirometric function, flow volume curves, lung volumes, inspiratory and expiratory muscle pressures, alveolar distensibility and diffusing capacity, together with height, weight and fat free mass. Chest shape was measured using radiographs. The mean total lung capacity and vital capacity in the Caucasian group, expressed as percentage predicted, were 5 and 10% higher than in the Chinese group and 17 and 20% higher than in the Indian group. Chinese values for these measurements were 12 and 10% greater than Indian. We found that Caucasians had higher fat free masses, higher inspiratory and expiratory muscle pressures and wider chests than the other races. The Caucasians and Chinese had longer chests than the Indians. There was no difference in alveolar distensibility or in the diffusion coefficient between the groups. These findings suggest that Caucasians have larger lung volumes than Chinese and Indians because they have increased numbers of alveoli and physically larger chest cavities, and not because of greater alveolar distensibility. Chest dimensions, together with height and race explained 90% of the variation in forced vital capacity and 86% of the variation in total lung capacity. Height multiplied by fat free mass, a "physique factor", previously suggested as the best predictive factor for forced vital capacity in Caucasians, did not account for much of the variation in forced vital capacity between Caucasians and Indians, presumably because it takes no account of differences in chest dimensions.

摘要

相似文献

1
What factors explain racial differences in lung volumes?
Eur Respir J. 1991 Jul;4(7):829-38.
2
The large lungs of elite swimmers: an increased alveolar number?优秀游泳运动员的大肺活量:肺泡数量增加?
Eur Respir J. 1993 Feb;6(2):237-47.
3
Maximal respiratory pressures in adult Chinese, Malays and Indians.成年中国人、马来人和印度人的最大呼吸压力。
Eur Respir J. 1997 Dec;10(12):2825-8. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10122825.
4
Lung elastic recoil in normal young adult Chinese compared with Caucasians.
Eur Respir J. 1995 Mar;8(3):446-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08030446.
5
[Characteristics of lung volume and expiratory flow seen in black Africans adults].[成年非洲黑人的肺容积和呼气流量特征]
Rev Mal Respir. 1990;7(3):215-22.
6
Chest wall mobility is related to respiratory muscle strength and lung volumes in healthy subjects.健康受试者的胸壁活动度与呼吸肌力量和肺容积有关。
Respir Care. 2013 Dec;58(12):2107-12. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02415. Epub 2013 May 14.
7
Diffusing capacity in healthy elderly Chinese.健康中国老年人的弥散功能
Gerontology. 1989;35(5-6):315-22. doi: 10.1159/000213043.
8
Measured diffusion capacity versus prediction equation estimates in blacks without lung disease.无肺部疾病黑人的实测弥散能力与预测方程估计值的比较
Respiration. 2004 Sep-Oct;71(5):484-92. doi: 10.1159/000080633.
9
Lung function in Indian twin children: comparison of genetic versus environmental influence.印度双胞胎儿童的肺功能:遗传与环境影响的比较
Ann Hum Biol. 1995 Jul-Aug;22(4):289-303. doi: 10.1080/03014469500003962.
10
Pulmonary function in healthy Chinese, Malay and Indian adults in Singapore.新加坡健康华人、马来人和印度成年人的肺功能。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1993 Nov;22(6):878-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the generalisability of formulas used to set tidal volumes in mechanically ventilated patients: an observational, multicohort, retrospective study.评估用于设置机械通气患者潮气量的公式的通用性:一项观察性、多队列、回顾性研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00126-2.
2
Factors related with lung functions among Orang Asli in Tasik Chini, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study.马来西亚 Tasik Chini 的原住民肺部功能相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):1791. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19296-x.
3
Endobronchial valves for emphysema and persistent air-leak: 10-year experience in an Asian country.
支气管内瓣膜治疗肺气肿和持续性肺漏气:亚洲国家 10 年经验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Apr 3;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02982-2.
4
Is it time to end race and ethnicity adjustment for pediatric pulmonary function tests?是否应该停止儿科肺功能测试中的种族和民族调整?
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024 Dec;59(12):3806-3811. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26444. Epub 2023 May 3.
5
Race and Ethnicity in Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation: An Official American Thoracic Society Statement.肺功能测试解读中的种族和民族差异:美国胸科学会官方声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 15;207(8):978-995. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202302-0310ST.
6
Race- and Ethnicity-Based Spirometry Reference Equations: Are They Accurate for Genetically Admixed Children?种族和民族为基础的肺量计参考方程:它们是否适用于遗传混合儿童?
Chest. 2022 Jul;162(1):184-195. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.12.664. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Prevalence of sleep apnea and lung function abnormalities in patients with acromegaly.肢端肥大症患者睡眠呼吸暂停和肺功能异常的患病率
Lung India. 2022 Jan-Feb;39(1):58-64. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_182_21.
8
Addressing Race in Pulmonary Function Testing by Aligning Intent and Evidence With Practice and Perception.在肺功能测试中解决种族问题,使意图和证据与实践和认知保持一致。
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):288-297. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.053. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
9
Normal Predicted Reference Values for Spirometry in Korean Children and Adolescents.韩国儿童和青少年肺活量测定的正常预测参考值。
Children (Basel). 2020 Aug 19;7(9):105. doi: 10.3390/children7090105.
10
Establishment of Reference Norms for Lung Function Parameters of Healthy Sri Lankan Tamils.斯里兰卡泰米尔族健康人群肺功能参数参考标准的建立。
Pulm Med. 2019 Dec 19;2019:2169627. doi: 10.1155/2019/2169627. eCollection 2019.