Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, United States.
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Dec 14;205(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.027. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
These experiments examined the effects of prior stress, corticosterone, or epinephrine on learning in mazes that can be solved efficiently using either place or response strategies. In a repeated stress condition, rats received restraint stress for 6h/day for 21 days, ending 24h before food-motivated maze training. In two single stress conditions, rats received a 1-h episode of restraint stress ending 30 min or 24h prior to training. Single stress ending 30 min prior to training resulted in a significant interaction of stress and learning on the two tasks, with significant enhancement of learning in the response task and non-significant impairment in the place task. Neither acute nor chronic stress significantly altered learning in either task when the stress ended 24h before training. Thus, the anterograde effects of stress on maze learning ended within a single day. Two stress-related hormones, corticosterone and epinephrine, were tested for effects on learning parallel to those of acute stress. When administered 30 min prior to training, a corticosterone dose (40 mg/kg) that enhanced memory on a spontaneous alternation task did not significantly enhance or impair learning in either task. Two doses of epinephrine that modulate memory in other settings were used to test the effects of epinephrine on learning. Pre-training injections of 0.03 mg/kg epinephrine impaired place learning, while 0.1mg/kg epinephrine impaired response learning. The epinephrine results mimicked those seen with acute stress on the place task, but were opposite those seen after acute stress on the response task. Thus, corticosterone does not appear to be a major factor mediating the effects of acute stress on place and response learning and epinephrine is, at most, a partial contributor to these effects.
这些实验研究了先前的应激、皮质酮或肾上腺素对迷宫学习的影响,这些迷宫可以通过位置或反应策略有效地解决。在重复应激条件下,大鼠每天接受 6 小时的束缚应激,持续 21 天,在食物动机迷宫训练前 24 小时结束。在两种单次应激条件下,大鼠接受 1 小时的束缚应激,应激结束时间分别为训练前 30 分钟或 24 小时。单次应激结束前 30 分钟训练导致应激和学习在两个任务上的显著交互作用,反应任务的学习显著增强,而位置任务的学习无显著损害。当应激结束于训练前 24 小时时,急性或慢性应激均未显著改变两个任务的学习。因此,应激对迷宫学习的顺行效应在一天内结束。两种应激相关激素,皮质酮和肾上腺素,被测试对学习的影响与急性应激相似。当在训练前 30 分钟给药时,皮质酮剂量(40mg/kg)增强了自发交替任务的记忆,但对两个任务的学习均无显著增强或损害。在其他环境中调节记忆的两种肾上腺素剂量用于测试肾上腺素对学习的影响。训练前注射 0.03mg/kg 肾上腺素损害了位置学习,而 0.1mg/kg 肾上腺素损害了反应学习。肾上腺素的结果与急性应激在位置任务上的结果相似,但与急性应激在反应任务上的结果相反。因此,皮质酮似乎不是介导急性应激对位置和反应学习影响的主要因素,而肾上腺素最多只是这些影响的部分贡献者。