• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲属间进行的捐赠游戏。

The donation game with roles played between relatives.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2009 Oct 7;260(3):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.008
PMID:19616012
Abstract

We consider a social game with two choices, played between two relatives, where roles are assigned to individuals so that the interaction is asymmetric. Behaviour in each of the two roles is determined by a separate genetic locus. Such asymmetric interactions between relatives, in which individuals occupy different behavioural contexts, may occur in nature, for example between adult parents and juvenile offspring. The social game considered is known to be equivalent to a donation game with non-additive payoffs, and has previously been analysed for the single locus case, both for discrete and continuous strategy traits. We present an inclusive fitness analysis of the discrete trait game with roles and recover equilibrium conditions including fixation of selfish or altruistic behaviour under both behavioural contexts, or fixation of selfish behaviour under one context and altruistic behaviour under the other context. These equilibrium solutions assume that the payoff matrices under each behavioural context are identical. The equilibria possible do depend crucially, however, on the deviation from payoff additivity that occurs when both interacting individuals act altruistically.

摘要

我们考虑了一种具有两种选择的社会博弈,由两个亲属之间进行,其中角色被分配给个人,从而使互动是不对称的。在两个角色中的每一个角色中的行为都由一个单独的遗传基因座决定。这种亲属之间的不对称相互作用,其中个体占据不同的行为环境,可能在自然界中发生,例如在成年父母和幼年后代之间。所考虑的社会博弈与非加性收益的捐赠博弈相当,并且之前已经对单基因座情况进行了分析,包括离散和连续策略特征。我们对具有角色的离散特征游戏进行了适合度综合分析,并恢复了平衡条件,包括在两种行为环境下自私或利他行为的固定,或者在一种行为环境下自私行为的固定和在另一种行为环境下利他行为的固定。这些平衡解假设在每个行为环境下的收益矩阵是相同的。然而,当两个相互作用的个体都表现出利他行为时,发生的收益加性偏差会极大地影响可能的平衡解决方案。

相似文献

1
The donation game with roles played between relatives.亲属间进行的捐赠游戏。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Oct 7;260(3):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
2
Natural selection and social preferences.自然选择与社会偏好。
J Theor Biol. 2006 Mar 7;239(1):79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.07.014. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
3
Unifying genetic and game theoretic models of kin selection for continuous traits.统一连续性状亲属选择的遗传模型和博弈论模型。
J Theor Biol. 1998 Oct 7;194(3):391-407. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0762.
4
Effects of information and group structure on evolution of altruism: analysis of two-score model by covariance and contextual analyses.信息与群体结构对利他主义进化的影响:基于协方差和情境分析的双分数模型分析
J Theor Biol. 2005 Jan 21;232(2):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.08.006.
5
Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of bimatrix games.双矩阵博弈的随机演化动力学。
J Theor Biol. 2010 May 7;264(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.01.016. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
6
Perfect reciprocity is the only evolutionarily stable strategy in the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma.在连续重复的囚徒困境中,完美互惠是唯一进化稳定策略。
J Theor Biol. 2007 Jul 7;247(1):11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 Mar 3.
7
Comparative statics of games between relatives.亲属间博弈的比较静态分析。
Theor Popul Biol. 2006 Mar;69(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
8
Stochastic sampling of interaction partners versus deterministic payoff assignment.随机抽样的互动伙伴与确定性收益分配。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Apr 21;257(4):689-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.12.025. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
9
The evolution of altruism: game theory in multilevel selection and inclusive fitness.利他主义的演变:多级选择与广义适合度中的博弈论
J Theor Biol. 2007 Mar 7;245(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.030. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
10
Altruism through beard chromodynamics.通过胡须色动力学实现的利他主义。
Nature. 2006 Mar 30;440(7084):663-6. doi: 10.1038/nature04387.

引用本文的文献

1
Matrix games between full siblings in Mendelian populations.孟德尔群体中全同胞之间的矩阵博弈。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0331044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331044. eCollection 2025.
2
Negotiation and appeasement can be more effective drivers of sociality than kin selection.与亲缘选择相比,协商与安抚可能是更有效的社交驱动力。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150089. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0089.
3
Asymmetric Evolutionary Games.非对称进化博弈
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Aug 26;11(8):e1004349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004349. eCollection 2015 Aug.
4
Adaptive topographies and equilibrium selection in an evolutionary game.进化博弈中的适应性地貌与均衡选择
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0116307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116307. eCollection 2015.
5
Kin selection and the evolution of social information use in animal conflict.亲缘选择与动物冲突中社会信息利用的进化
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031664. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
6
Heterogeneous aspirations promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game.异质期望促进囚徒困境博弈中的合作。
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 6;5(12):e15117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015117.