Grahn D A, Dillon J L, Heller H C
Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
J Biomech Eng. 2009 Jul;131(7):071005. doi: 10.1115/1.3156812.
Insulation reduces heat exchange between a body and the environment. Glabrous (nonhairy) skin surfaces (palms of the hands, soles of the feet, face, and ears) constitute a small percentage of total body surface area but contain specialized vascular structures that facilitate heat loss. We have previously reported that cooling the glabrous skin surfaces is effective in alleviating heat stress and that the application of local subatmospheric pressure enhances the effect. In this paper, we compare the effects of cooling multiple glabrous skin surfaces with and without vacuum on thermal recovery in heavily insulated heat-stressed individuals. Esophageal temperatures (T(es)) and heart rates were monitored throughout the trials. Water loss was determined from pre- and post-trial nude weights. Treadmill exercise (5.6 km/h, 9-16% slope, and 25-45 min duration) in a hot environment (41.5 degrees C, 20-30% relative humidity) while wearing insulating pants and jackets was used to induce heat stress (T(es)>or=39 degrees C). For postexercise recovery, the subjects donned additional insulation (a balaclava, winter gloves, and impermeable boot covers) and rested in the hot environment for 60 min. Postexercise cooling treatments included control (no cooling) or the application of a 10 degrees C closed water circulating system to (a) the hand(s) with or without application of a local subatmospheric pressure, (b) the face, (c) the feet, or (d) multiple glabrous skin regions. Following exercise induction of heat stress in heavily insulated subjects, the rate of recovery of T(es) was 0.4+/-0.2 degrees C/h(n=12), but with application of cooling to one hand, the rate was 0.8+/-0.3 degrees C/h(n=12), and with one hand cooling with subatmospheric pressure, the rate was 1.0+/-0.2 degrees C/h(n=12). Cooling alone yielded two responses, one resembling that of cooling with subatmospheric pressure (n=8) and one resembling that of no cooling (n=4). The effect of treating multiple surfaces was additive (no cooling, DeltaT(es)=-0.4+/-0.2 degrees C; one hand, -0.9+/-0.3 degrees C; face, -1.0+/-0.3 degrees C; two hands, -1.3+/-0.1 degrees C; two feet, -1.3+/-0.3 degrees C; and face, feet, and hands, -1.6+/-0.2 degrees C). Cooling treatments had a similar effect on water loss and final resting heart rate. In heat-stressed resting subjects, cooling the glabrous skin regions was effective in lowering T(es). Under this protocol, the application of local subatmospheric pressure did not significantly increase heat transfer per se but, presumably, increased the likelihood of an effect.
隔热可减少人体与环境之间的热交换。无毛(光滑)皮肤表面(手掌、脚底、面部和耳朵)占全身表面积的比例较小,但含有有助于散热的特殊血管结构。我们之前曾报道,冷却无毛皮肤表面可有效缓解热应激,并且施加局部负压可增强这种效果。在本文中,我们比较了在有真空和无真空条件下冷却多个无毛皮肤表面对重度隔热热应激个体热恢复的影响。在整个试验过程中监测食管温度(T(es))和心率。通过试验前后的裸重确定失水量。在炎热环境(41.5摄氏度,相对湿度20 - 30%)中,穿着隔热裤和夹克进行跑步机运动(速度5.6千米/小时,坡度9 - 16%,持续时间25 - 45分钟)以诱导热应激(T(es)≥39摄氏度)。运动后恢复时,受试者戴上额外的隔热装备(头罩、冬季手套和不透水的靴套),并在炎热环境中休息60分钟。运动后冷却处理包括对照(不冷却)或应用10摄氏度的闭式水循环系统于(a)一只或两只手,有无施加局部负压;(b)面部;(c)双脚;或(d)多个无毛皮肤区域。在重度隔热受试者运动诱导热应激后,T(es)的恢复速率为0.4±0.2摄氏度/小时(n = 12),但对一只手进行冷却时,速率为0.8±0.3摄氏度/小时(n = 12),对一只手进行负压冷却时,速率为一1.0±0.2摄氏度/小时(n = 12)。单独冷却产生了两种反应,一种类似于负压冷却(n = 8),一种类似于不冷却(n = 4)。处理多个表面的效果是累加性的(不冷却,ΔT(es)= - 0.4±0.2摄氏度;一只手, - 0.9±0.3摄氏度;面部, - 1.0±0.3摄氏度;两只手, - 1.3±0.1摄氏度;两只脚, - 1.3±0.3摄氏度;面部、双脚和双手, - 1.6±0.2摄氏度)。冷却处理对失水量和最终静息心率有类似影响。在热应激静息受试者中,冷却无毛皮肤区域可有效降低T(es)。在此方案下,施加局部负压本身并未显著增加热传递,但可能增加了产生效果的可能性。