• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体植入前使用 BoneCeramic® 填充拔牙窝的愈合:初步组织学发现。

Healing of extraction sockets filled with BoneCeramic® prior to implant placement: preliminary histological findings.

机构信息

Unit of Oral Development and Applied Oral Histology, Paecamed Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Mar;13(1):34-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00184.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00184.x
PMID:19681930
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various grafting materials have been designed to minimize edentulous ridge volume loss following tooth extraction by encouraging new bone formation in healing sockets. BoneCeramic® is a composite of hydroxyapatite and bèta-tricalcium phosphate with pores of 100-500 microns.

PURPOSES

The aim of this study was to evaluate bone regeneration in healing sockets substituted with BoneCeramic® prior to implant procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen extraction sockets were substituted with BoneCeramic® and 14 sockets were left to heal naturally in 10 patients (mean age 59.6 years). Biopsies were collected only from the implant recipient sites during surgery after healing periods ranging from 6-74 weeks (mean 22). In total, 24 biopsies were available; 10 from substituted and 14 from naturally healed sites. In one site, the implant was not placed intentionally and, in four substituted sites, implant placement had to be postponed due to inappropriate healing, hence from five sites biopsies were not available. Histological sections were examined by transmitted light microscope.

RESULTS

At the time of implant surgery, bone at substituted sites was softer than in controls, compromising initial implant stability. New bone formation at substituted sites was consistently poorer than in controls, presenting predominantly loose connective tissue and less woven bone.

CONCLUSION

The use of BoneCeramic® as a grafting material in fresh extraction sockets appears to interfere with normal healing processes of the alveolar bone. On the basis of the present preliminary findings, its indication as a material for bone augmentation, when implant placement is considered within 6-38 weeks after extraction, should be revised.

摘要

背景

为了通过促进愈合牙槽骨中的新骨形成来最小化拔牙后无牙颌骨量的损失,已经设计了各种移植物。BoneCeramic®是一种由羟基磷灰石和β-磷酸三钙组成的复合材料,具有 100-500 微米的孔。

目的

本研究旨在评估在植入手术前用 BoneCeramic®替代愈合牙槽骨时的骨再生情况。

材料和方法

10 名患者(平均年龄 59.6 岁)的 15 个拔牙窝被 BoneCeramic®替代,14 个拔牙窝自然愈合。在愈合期为 6-74 周(平均 22 周)后,仅在手术期间从植入物受区采集活检。共有 24 个活检标本,10 个取自替代区,14 个取自自然愈合区。在一个部位,未故意放置植入物,在 5 个替代部位中的 4 个部位,由于愈合不当,必须推迟植入物放置,因此,5 个部位没有活检标本。通过透射光显微镜检查组织学切片。

结果

在植入手术时,替代部位的骨比对照组更软,从而影响初始植入物的稳定性。替代部位的新骨形成始终比对照组差,主要表现为疏松结缔组织和较少的编织骨。

结论

在新鲜拔牙窝中使用 BoneCeramic®作为移植物似乎会干扰牙槽骨的正常愈合过程。基于目前的初步发现,当考虑在拔牙后 6-38 周内植入物时,应重新评估其作为骨增量材料的适应证。

相似文献

1
Healing of extraction sockets filled with BoneCeramic® prior to implant placement: preliminary histological findings.种植体植入前使用 BoneCeramic® 填充拔牙窝的愈合:初步组织学发现。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Mar;13(1):34-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00184.x.
2
Histomorphometric analysis of extraction sockets augmented with Bio-Oss Collagen after a 6-week healing period: a prospective study.6周愈合期后使用Bio-Oss胶原骨粉增强拔牙窝的组织形态计量学分析:一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1219-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01617.x.
3
Clinical evaluation alveolar ridge preservation with a beta-tricalcium phosphate socket graft.使用β-磷酸三钙牙槽窝植骨进行牙槽嵴保存的临床评估
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2009 Nov-Dec;30(9):588-90, 592, 594 passim; quiz 604, 606.
4
Histological comparison of healing extraction sockets implanted with bioactive glass or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: a pilot study.生物活性玻璃或脱矿冻干骨移植修复拔牙窝的组织学比较:一项初步研究。
J Periodontol. 2002 Jan;73(1):94-102. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.94.
5
Comparison of magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite and porcine bone in human extraction socket healing: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation.富镁羟磷灰石和猪骨在人拔牙窝愈合中的比较:组织学和组织形态计量学评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):1057-62.
6
Anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite vs β-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation: a comparative histomorphometric study.用于上颌窦提升的无机牛源羟基磷灰石与β-磷酸三钙:一项比较组织形态计量学研究
J Oral Implantol. 2012 Sep;38 Spec No:519-26. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00061.
7
Sinus bone graft using new alloplastic bone graft material (Osteon)-II: clinical evaluation.使用新型异体骨移植材料(Osteon)-II进行鼻窦骨移植:临床评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):e14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.047.
8
Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.使用Bio-Oss或Straumann骨陶瓷进行上颌窦植骨:一项随机对照多中心临床试验的组织形态计量学结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Aug;19(8):796-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01565.x.
9
Clinical-radiographic and histological evaluation of two hydroxyapatites in human extraction sockets: a pilot study.两种羟磷灰石在人拔牙窝中临床-影像学和组织学评估:一项初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 May;40(5):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
10
Maxillary sinus augmentation in humans using cortical porcine bone: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation after 4 and 6 months.采用猪皮质骨进行上颌窦提升术:4 个月和 6 个月后的组织学和组织形态计量学评估。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Mar;13(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00176.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Combination of Beta-tricalcium Phosphate, Plasmogel, and Platelet-rich Plasma Improves Long-term Bone Tissue Restoration after Complicated Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.β-磷酸三钙、血浆凝胶和富血小板血浆联合应用可改善复杂下颌第三磨牙手术后的长期骨组织修复:一项非随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):84-88. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_544_23. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
2
In Vitro Handling Characteristics of a Particulate Bone Substitute for Ridge Preservation Procedures.用于牙槽嵴保存手术的颗粒状骨替代物的体外处理特性
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;17(2):313. doi: 10.3390/ma17020313.
3
Frontiers of Hydroxyapatite Composites in Bionic Bone Tissue Engineering.
仿生骨组织工程中羟基磷灰石复合材料的前沿进展
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;15(23):8475. doi: 10.3390/ma15238475.
4
Comparison of extraction sites versus artificial defects with xenogenic bone substitute in minipigs.比较小型猪的异种骨替代物的提取部位与人工缺陷。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Aug;7(4):490-501. doi: 10.1002/cre2.390. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Socket Healing in the Absence and Presence of Graft Materials and Autologous Platelet Concentrates: a Focused Review.有无移植材料和自体血小板浓缩物时牙槽窝愈合的分子和细胞层面:重点综述
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019 Sep 5;10(3):e2. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2019.10302. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep.
6
The use of hydroxyapatite bone substitute grafting for alveolar ridge preservation, sinus augmentation, and periodontal bone defect: A systematic review.羟基磷灰石骨替代物移植在牙槽嵴保存、上颌窦提升和牙周骨缺损中的应用:一项系统评价。
Heliyon. 2018 Nov 2;4(10):e00884. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00884. eCollection 2018 Oct.
7
Alveolar Ridge Conservation by Early Bone Formation After Tooth Extraction in Rabbits. A Histomorphological Study.兔拔牙后早期骨形成对牙槽嵴的保存:一项组织形态学研究
Int J Morphol. 2015 Mar;33(1):369-374. doi: 10.4067/S0717-95022015000100058.
8
Osseointegration aspects of placed implant in bone reconstruction with newly developed block-type interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite.新型块状相互连通多孔羟基磷灰石在骨重建中植入种植体的骨整合方面
J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;24(4):325-31. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150597.
9
A new method to standardize CBCT for quantitative evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation in the mandible: a case report and review of the literature.一种用于下颌牙槽嵴保存的 CBCT 定量评估的标准化新方法:病例报告及文献复习。
Regen Biomater. 2015 Dec;2(4):251-60. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbv017. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
10
Differential expression of immunologic proteins in gingiva after socket preservation in mini pigs.小型猪拔牙窝保存后牙龈中免疫蛋白的差异表达
J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):187-95. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140311.