Suppr超能文献

支持语言理解的记忆操作:来自动词短语省略的证据。

Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis.

作者信息

Martin Andrea E, McElree Brian

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1231-9. doi: 10.1037/a0016271.

Abstract

Comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis (VPE) requires reevaluation of recently processed constituents, which often necessitates retrieval of information about the elided constituent from memory. A. E. Martin and B. McElree (2008) argued that representations formed during comprehension are content addressable and that VPE antecedents are retrieved from memory via a cue-dependent direct-access pointer rather than via a search process. This hypothesis was further tested by manipulating the location of interfering material-either before the onset of the antecedent (proactive interference; PI) or intervening between antecedent and ellipsis site (retroactive interference; RI). The speed-accuracy tradeoff procedure was used to measure the time course of VPE processing. The location of the interfering material affected VPE comprehension accuracy: RI conditions engendered lower accuracy than PI conditions. Crucially, location did not affect the speed of processing VPE, which is inconsistent with both forward and backward search mechanisms. The observed time-course profiles are consistent with the hypothesis that VPE antecedents are retrieved via a cue-dependent direct-access operation.

摘要

对动词短语省略(VPE)的理解需要重新评估最近处理的成分,这通常需要从记忆中检索有关省略成分的信息。A. E. 马丁和B. 麦克尔里(2008年)认为,理解过程中形成的表征是内容可寻址的,并且VPE先行词是通过依赖线索的直接访问指针从记忆中检索出来的,而不是通过搜索过程。通过操纵干扰材料的位置——要么在先行词出现之前(前摄干扰;PI),要么在先行词和省略位置之间(倒摄干扰;RI),对这一假设进行了进一步测试。速度-准确性权衡程序被用来测量VPE处理的时间进程。干扰材料的位置影响了VPE理解的准确性:RI条件下的准确性低于PI条件。至关重要的是,位置并不影响处理VPE的速度,这与向前和向后搜索机制均不一致。观察到的时间进程概况与VPE先行词通过依赖线索的直接访问操作进行检索的假设一致。

相似文献

5
The on-line processing of verb-phrase ellipsis in aphasia.失语症中动词短语省略的在线处理
J Psycholinguist Res. 2009 Jun;38(3):237-53. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9108-4. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
6
A Note on the Voice Mismatch Asymmetry in Ellipsis.关于省略中语音不匹配不对称性的一则注释。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Aug;48(4):877-887. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09636-z.
7
Cues, quantification, and agreement in language comprehension.语言理解中的线索、量化与一致性
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1753-63. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0850-3.

引用本文的文献

5
Hierarchical structure and memory mechanisms in agreement attraction.协议吸引中的层次结构和记忆机制。
PLoS One. 2020 May 19;15(5):e0232163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232163. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

3
Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension.句子理解中的检索干扰。
J Mem Lang. 2006 Aug;55(2):157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007.
4
Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory.识别记忆中的速度-准确性权衡。
Science. 1973 Aug 10;181(4099):574-6. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4099.574.
7
The myth of the encoding-retrieval match.编码-检索匹配的神话。
Memory. 2002 Sep-Nov;10(5-6):389-95. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000216.
8
Memory-load interference in syntactic processing.句法处理中的记忆负荷干扰。
Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):425-30. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00475.
9
Working memory and focal attention.工作记忆与集中注意力。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 May;27(3):817-35.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验