School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Oecologia. 2010 Jan;162(1):163-74. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1441-7.
Identifying the mechanisms that underpin species richness is one of the central issues of community ecology. On rocky shores in north-western Europe, two key limpet species coexist on the mid- and low shore but are segregated at small scales with respect to habitat. Shortterm and long-term experiments were done to test whether habitat suitability or habitat-specific competition drives the small-scale segregation of these species and therefore underpins their coexistence at larger spatial scales. In a controlled short-term experiment, Patella vulgata was transplanted onto open rock and into pools that either contained Patella ulyssiponensis and/or their mucus or from which P. ulyssiponensis and/or their mucus had been removed. After 2 days, P. vulgata remained in all experimental plots in similar numbers irrespective of treatment indicating that there was no negative response to P. ulyssiponensis, mucus or the pool habitat. In a long-term experiment, cage enclosures containing both species were set up in pools and on open rock over a 6-month period. P. vulgata grew equally well on both open rock and in pools but suffered higher mortality in pools. P. ulyssiponensis showed lower growth rate and higher mortality on open rock than in pools. P. ulyssiponensis exhibited increased growth in higher intraspecific densities on open rock and reduced growth in higher intraspecific densities in pools, indicating some degree of intraspecific facilitation on open rock and intraspecific competition in pools. There was no evidence of interspecific competition either in the short term or in the long term. Results revealed that habitat suitability was the mechanism causing segregation of these species at smaller spatial scales enabling them to coexist at larger spatial scales. Conflicting results in the short-term and long-term experiments highlight the importance of considering the correct temporal extent for experimental tests of hypotheses.
确定物种丰富度的机制是群落生态学的核心问题之一。在欧洲西北部的岩石海岸上,两种关键的帽贝物种在中潮带和低潮带共存,但在小尺度上,它们在栖息地方面是分开的。进行了短期和长期实验,以测试栖息地适宜性或特定栖息地竞争是否驱动这些物种的小尺度分离,从而支撑它们在更大空间尺度上的共存。在一项受控的短期实验中,将普通帽贝(Patella vulgata)移植到开阔的岩石和包含或不包含 Patella ulyssiponensis 及其粘液的水池中。两天后,无论处理方式如何,P. vulgata 在所有实验小区中的数量都相似,这表明它对 P. ulyssiponensis、粘液或水池栖息地没有负面反应。在一项长期实验中,将包含这两个物种的笼状围栏设置在水池和开阔的岩石上,为期 6 个月。P. vulgata 在开阔的岩石和水池中生长情况相同,但在水池中死亡率更高。P. ulyssiponensis 在开阔的岩石上生长速度较慢,死亡率较高,而在水池中生长速度较快,死亡率较低。P. ulyssiponensis 在开阔的岩石上的种内密度较高时生长速度增加,而在水池中的种内密度较高时生长速度降低,表明在开阔的岩石上存在一定程度的种内促进作用,而在水池中存在种内竞争。无论是短期还是长期,都没有证据表明存在种间竞争。研究结果表明,栖息地适宜性是导致这些物种在较小空间尺度上分离的机制,使它们能够在较大空间尺度上共存。短期和长期实验中的矛盾结果强调了考虑实验测试假设的正确时间范围的重要性。