Sharan P, Gallo C, Gureje O, Lamberte E, Mari J J, Mazzotti G, Patel V, Swartz L, Olifson S, Levav I, de Francisco A, Saxena S
Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110029, India.
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;195(4):354-63. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.050187.
Studies suggest a paucity of and lack of prioritisation in mental health research from low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries.
To investigate research priorities in mental health among researchers and other stakeholders in LAMI countries.
We used a two-stage design that included identification, through literature searches and snowball technique, of researchers and stakeholders in 114 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean; and a mail survey on priorities in research.
The study identified broad agreement between researchers and stakeholders and across regions regarding research priorities. Epidemiology (burden and risk factors), health systems and social science ranked highest for type of research. Depression/anxiety, substance use disorders and psychoses; and children and adolescents, women, and people exposed to violence/trauma were prioritised among the disorders and population groups respectively. Important criteria for prioritising research were burden of disease, social justice, and availability of funds. Stakeholder groups differed in the importance they gave to the personal interest of researchers as a criterion for prioritising research. Researchers' and stakeholders' priorities were consistent with burden of disease estimates, however suicide was underprioritised compared with its burden. Researchers' and stakeholders' priorities were also largely congruent with the researchers' projects.
The results of this first ever conducted survey of researchers and stakeholders regarding research priorities in mental health suggest that it should be possible to develop consensus at regional and international levels regarding the research agenda that is necessary to support health system objectives in LAMI countries.
研究表明,低收入和中等收入(LAMI)国家的心理健康研究匮乏且缺乏优先级排序。
调查LAMI国家研究人员和其他利益相关者对心理健康研究的优先级。
我们采用了两阶段设计,首先通过文献检索和滚雪球技术确定非洲、亚洲、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区114个国家的研究人员和利益相关者;然后对研究优先级进行邮件调查。
该研究发现,研究人员和利益相关者之间以及不同地区之间在研究优先级上达成了广泛共识。流行病学(负担和风险因素)、卫生系统和社会科学在研究类型中排名最高。抑郁症/焦虑症、物质使用障碍和精神病;以及儿童和青少年、妇女以及遭受暴力/创伤的人群分别在疾病和人群组中被列为优先事项。确定研究优先级的重要标准是疾病负担、社会正义和资金可用性。利益相关者群体在将研究人员的个人兴趣作为确定研究优先级的标准时所赋予的重要性方面存在差异。研究人员和利益相关者的优先级与疾病负担估计一致,然而,与自杀负担相比,自杀的优先级较低。研究人员和利益相关者的优先级也与研究人员的项目在很大程度上一致。
这项有史以来首次针对研究人员和利益相关者关于心理健康研究优先级的调查结果表明,应该有可能在区域和国际层面就支持LAMI国家卫生系统目标所需的研究议程达成共识。