• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID-C)的中文版。

Validation of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-C) scale.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Yuanpei University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):38-40. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0768. Epub 2009 Oct 6.

DOI:10.2337/dc09-0768
PMID:19808922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2797982/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID-C) scale.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The reliability and validity of the PAID-C were evaluated in a convenience sample of 205 outpatients with type 2 diabetes. Confirmatory factor analysis, Bland-Altman analysis, and Spearman's correlations facilitated the psychometric evaluation.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a one-factor structure of the PAID-C (chi(2)/df ratio = 1.894, goodness-of-fit index = 0.901, comparative fit index = 0.905, root mean square error of approximation = 0.066). The PAID-C was associated with A1C (r(s) = 0.15; P < 0.05) and diabetes self-care behaviors in general diet (r(s) = -0.17; P < 0.05) and exercise (r(s) = -0.17; P < 0.05). The 4-week test-retest reliability demonstrated satisfactory stability (r(s) = 0.83; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The PAID-C is a reliable and valid measure to determine diabetes-related emotional distress in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

目的

考察中文版糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID-C)的心理计量学特性。

研究设计和方法

在 205 例 2 型糖尿病门诊患者的便利样本中,评估 PAID-C 的信度和效度。验证性因子分析、Bland-Altman 分析和 Spearman 相关系数有助于心理计量学评估。

结果

验证性因子分析证实 PAID-C 具有单因素结构(卡方/自由度比=1.894,拟合优度指数=0.901,比较拟合指数=0.905,近似均方根误差=0.066)。PAID-C 与糖化血红蛋白(r(s)=0.15;P<0.05)和一般饮食(r(s)=-0.17;P<0.05)和运动(r(s)=-0.17;P<0.05)的糖尿病自我护理行为相关。4 周的重测信度显示出良好的稳定性(r(s)=0.83;P<0.01)。

结论

PAID-C 是一种可靠且有效的测量工具,可用于确定中国 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病相关情绪困扰。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1823/2797982/acd2b6b32f24/zdc0011079640001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1823/2797982/acd2b6b32f24/zdc0011079640001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1823/2797982/acd2b6b32f24/zdc0011079640001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-C) scale.验证糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID-C)的中文版。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):38-40. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0768. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
2
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the self-stigma scale in patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者自我污名量表日文版的信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 12;12:179. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0179-z.
3
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the short form of The Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (PAID-5): a validation study.《糖尿病问题领域量表短式 5 项版(PAID-5)挪威语版的心理测量学特性:验证研究》。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 21;9(2):e022903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022903.
4
Assessing Diabetes Distress Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Malaysia Using the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale.使用糖尿病问题量表评估马来西亚2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 May;18:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (SG-PAID-C) among high-risk polypharmacy patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in Singapore.新加坡2型糖尿病控制不佳的高风险多重用药患者中糖尿病问题领域量表中文版(SG-PAID-C)的心理测量特性。
J Diabetes Investig. 2017 Mar;8(2):235-242. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12556. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Diabetes Coping Measure scale.糖尿病应对措施量表中文版的心理计量学评估。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(4):385-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01306.x.
7
Development of a reliable and valid Chinese version of the diabetes empowerment scale.糖尿病自我管理能力量表中文版的信效度研究
Diabetes Care. 2003 Oct;26(10):2817-21. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.10.2817.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Self-efficacy Scale among South Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes.韩国2型糖尿病老年患者中糖尿病自我效能量表韩文版的心理测量学评估
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Aug;23(15-16):2121-30. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12133. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes (AR-PAID-5) scale.5 项糖尿病问题领域量表(AR-PAID-5)阿拉伯文版的心理测量学评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 9;23(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01758-z.
10
Developing and psychometric testing of a short-form problem areas in diabetes scale in chinese patients.中文患者简易糖尿病问题领域量表的编制及心理测量学检验。
J Nurs Res. 2013 Sep;21(3):212-8. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000432048.31921.e2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Diabetes Knowledge and Diabetes Self-Care Behaviors in Relation to Diabetes Distress in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Eastern Taiwan.2型糖尿病患者中糖尿病知识及自我护理行为与糖尿病痛苦的关系:台湾东部的一项横断面研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 May 5;18:1431-1443. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S503754. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) scale among people with type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia: a tool validation study.埃塞俄比亚2型糖尿病患者糖尿病问题领域(PAID)量表的心理测量评估:一项工具验证研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Apr 9;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Icelandic version of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale.冰岛语版糖尿病问题领域(PAID)量表的信度和效度
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.10.008. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
2
Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire.糖尿病问题领域(PAID)问卷的反应性
Diabet Med. 2003 Jan;20(1):69-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00832.x.
3
Assessing intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements.评估连续测量的评分者内信度、评分者间信度和重测信度。
Short version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale(PAID-13) in Brazilian patients with diabetes: a structural and criterion validity study.
巴西糖尿病患者糖尿病问题领域简短量表(PAID - 13):一项结构效度和效标效度研究
Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 Mar 14;143(2):e2024109. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0109.R1.03072024. eCollection 2025.
4
Role of Psychological Distress in the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care and Self-Management Behaviors of Elderly Patients with T2DM Chronic Complications.心理困扰在2型糖尿病慢性并发症老年患者慢性病护理评估及自我管理行为中的作用
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Jan 22;18:185-196. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S498507. eCollection 2025.
5
Validation of the Chinese version of the diabetes health profile to predict the impact of mobile health education on quality of life in type 2 diabetes patients.验证中文版糖尿病健康档案在预测移动健康教育对 2 型糖尿病患者生活质量影响方面的作用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 21;12:1330154. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1330154. eCollection 2024.
6
The Japanese version of Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale: a clinical and research tool to assess emotional functioning among people with diabetes.糖尿病问题领域量表日文版:一种用于评估糖尿病患者情绪功能的临床及研究工具。
Diabetol Int. 2023 Sep 13;15(1):117-122. doi: 10.1007/s13340-023-00661-x. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
The Effect of Diabetes Management Shared Care Clinic on Glycated Hemoglobin A1c Compliance and Self-Management Abilities in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病管理共照门诊对 2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白达标率及自我管理能力的影响。
Int J Clin Pract. 2023 Dec 31;2023:2493634. doi: 10.1155/2023/2493634. eCollection 2023.
8
Validation of Chinese version of the 5-item WHO well-being index in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.中文版 5 项世界卫生组织幸福感指数在 2 型糖尿病患者中的验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):890. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05381-9.
9
Help-seeking during 1-year follow-up in Chinese patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus comorbid major depressive disorder.中文 2 型糖尿病合并重性抑郁障碍患者在 1 年随访期间的求助情况。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 10;14:1266183. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1266183. eCollection 2023.
10
Validity of the short-form five-item Problem Area in Diabetes questionnaire as a depression screening tool in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.简短五项糖尿病问题区问卷作为 2 型糖尿病患者抑郁筛查工具的有效性。
J Diabetes Investig. 2023 Sep;14(9):1128-1135. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14051. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
Stat Med. 2002 Nov 30;21(22):3431-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.1253.
4
An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research.一种适用于跨文化研究的布里斯林翻译模型。
Nurs Res. 2001 Sep-Oct;50(5):300-4. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008.
5
Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale.荷兰和美国糖尿病患者中与糖尿病相关的情绪困扰:糖尿病问题领域量表的跨文化效度
Diabetes Care. 2000 Sep;23(9):1305-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1305.
6
The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale.糖尿病自我护理活动量表总结:7项研究结果及修订版量表
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.
7
Assessment of diabetes-related distress.糖尿病相关困扰的评估。
Diabetes Care. 1995 Jun;18(6):754-60. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.6.754.
8
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.评估两种临床测量方法之间一致性的统计方法。
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.