Barber D, de la Torre F, Lombardero M, Antépara I, Colas C, Dávila I, Tabar A I, Vidal C, Villalba M, Salcedo G, Rodríguez R
Departamento de I+D, ALK-Abelló, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Nov;39(11):1764-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03351.x.
Allergy diagnosis needs to be improved in patients suffering from pollen polysensitization due to the existence of possible confounding factors in this type of patients.
To evaluate new diagnostic strategies by comparing skin responses to pan-allergens and conventional allergenic extracts with specific IgE (sIgE) to purified allergen molecules.
One thousand three hundred and twenty-nine pollen-allergic patients were diagnosed by a combination of an in vitro method with a panel of 13 purified allergens, including major allergens and pan-allergens, using a high-capacity screening technology (ADVIA-Centaur) and skin prick test (SPT) to pan-allergens and conventional extracts.
There was a high concordance (kappa index) between in vitro (sIgE to major allergens) and in vivo (SPT to conventional extracts) methods in patients who were not sensitized to pan-allergens, but SPT with conventional extracts failed to diagnose patients with sensitization to pan-allergens. In patients who were simultaneously sensitized to polcalcins and profilins, there was a duplication both in the number of sensitizations to major allergens and in the years of disease evolution. There was a statistical association between sensitization to profilins and/or lipid transfer proteins and food allergy (P<0.0001).
The novel diagnostic strategy has proven to be a valuable tool in daily clinical practice. Introduction of routine SPT to pan-allergens is a simple and feasible way of improving diagnostic efficacy. Patients sensitized to pan-allergens should be tested by an adequate panel of allergenic molecules in order to identify the allergens that are responsible for the allergic disease.
由于花粉多重致敏患者存在可能的混杂因素,此类患者的过敏诊断需要改进。
通过比较对泛过敏原和传统变应原提取物的皮肤反应与针对纯化变应原分子的特异性IgE(sIgE),评估新的诊断策略。
1329例花粉过敏患者采用体外方法结合13种纯化变应原(包括主要变应原和泛过敏原)进行诊断,使用高容量筛查技术(ADVIA-Centaur)以及对泛过敏原和传统提取物进行皮肤点刺试验(SPT)。
在对泛过敏原未致敏的患者中,体外(针对主要变应原的sIgE)和体内(针对传统提取物的SPT)方法之间存在高度一致性(kappa指数),但对传统提取物进行的SPT未能诊断出对泛过敏原致敏的患者。在同时对钙结合蛋白和肌动蛋白结合蛋白致敏的患者中,对主要变应原的致敏数量以及疾病演变年限均存在重复情况。对肌动蛋白结合蛋白和/或脂质转移蛋白的致敏与食物过敏之间存在统计学关联(P<0.0001)。
新的诊断策略已被证明是日常临床实践中的一种有价值的工具。引入对泛过敏原的常规SPT是提高诊断效能的一种简单可行的方法。应对对泛过敏原致敏的患者采用适当的变应原分子组合进行检测,以确定导致过敏性疾病的变应原。