• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与医疗服务提供者间电子邮件沟通的系统评价

E-mail in patient-provider communication: a systematic review.

机构信息

National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.038. Epub 2009 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.038
PMID:19914022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4127895/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review systematically the role of e-mails in patient-provider communication in terms of e-mail content, and perspectives of providers and patients on e-mail communication in health care.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies on e-mail communication between patients and health providers in regular health care published from 2000 to 2008.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were included in the review. Among these studies, 21 studies examined e-mail communication between patients and providers, and three studies examined the e-mail communication between parents of patients in pediatric primary care and pediatricians. In the content analyses of e-mail messages, topics well represented were medical information exchange, medical condition or update, medication information, and subspecialty evaluation. A number of personal and institutional features were associated with the likelihood of e-mail use between patients and providers. While benefits of e-mails in enhancing communication were recognized by both patients and providers, concerns about confidentiality and security were also expressed.

CONCLUSION

The e-mail is transforming the relationship between patients and providers. The rigorous exploration of pros and cons of electronic interaction in health care settings will help make e-mail communication a more powerful, mutually beneficial health care provision tool.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

It is important to develop an electronic communication system for the clinical practice that can address a range of concerns. More efforts need to be made to educate patients and providers to appropriately and effectively use e-mail for communication.

摘要

目的

从电子邮件的内容以及医患双方对医疗保健中电子邮件沟通的看法两个方面,系统地回顾电子邮件在医患沟通中的作用。

方法

对 2000 年至 2008 年期间发表的关于常规医疗保健中患者与医疗服务提供者之间电子邮件沟通的研究进行系统评价。

结果

共有 24 项研究纳入综述。在这些研究中,21 项研究考察了患者与提供者之间的电子邮件沟通,3 项研究考察了儿科初级保健中患者家长与儿科医生之间的电子邮件沟通。在电子邮件信息的内容分析中,医学信息交流、病情或更新、药物信息和专科评估等主题得到了很好的体现。许多个人和机构特征与患者和提供者之间使用电子邮件的可能性相关。尽管患者和提供者都认识到电子邮件在增强沟通方面的益处,但也对保密性和安全性表示担忧。

结论

电子邮件正在改变医患关系。对电子互动在医疗保健环境中的利弊进行严格的探索,将有助于使电子邮件沟通成为一种更强大、互利的医疗服务提供工具。

实践意义

为临床实践开发一个可以解决各种问题的电子通信系统非常重要。需要进一步努力,对患者和医务人员进行教育,使他们能够适当和有效地利用电子邮件进行沟通。

相似文献

1
E-mail in patient-provider communication: a systematic review.患者与医疗服务提供者间电子邮件沟通的系统评价
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.038. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
2
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
3
Patient-doctor communication.医患沟通。
Med Clin North Am. 2003 Sep;87(5):1115-45. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(03)00066-x.
4
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
5
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
8
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
9
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
10
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.

引用本文的文献

1
Telemedicine and Digital Tools in Dentistry: Enhancing Diagnosis and Remote Patient Care.牙科中的远程医疗和数字工具:加强诊断与远程患者护理
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 30;61(5):826. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050826.
2
Assessing Patient Use of and Attitudes toward eHealth Services for Communication with Primary Care Centers in Saudi Arabia and Factors Affecting Usage.评估沙特阿拉伯患者对通过电子健康服务与初级保健中心进行沟通的使用情况和态度以及影响使用的因素。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;12(19):1929. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191929.
3
Digital Care Pathway for Patients With Sleep Apnea in Specialized Care: Mixed Methods Study.专科护理中睡眠呼吸暂停患者的数字化护理路径:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Feb 22;11:e47809. doi: 10.2196/47809.
4
Patients' views on health promotion and disease prevention services provided by healthcare workers in a South African tertiary hospital.南非一所三级医院的医护人员提供的健康促进和疾病预防服务的患者观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09351-5.
5
Patient Expectation in China: Exploring Patient Satisfaction in Online and Offline Patient-Provider Communication.中国患者的期望:探索线上和线下医患沟通中的患者满意度
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 10;13:888657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888657. eCollection 2022.
6
Asthma Patients' Use of Cell Phone Features and Their Willingness to Use Them for Self-Management.哮喘患者对手机功能的使用情况及其将这些功能用于自我管理的意愿。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 18;14(3):e23292. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23292. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
A Population Study on COVID-19 Information Sharing: Sociodemographic Differences and Associations with Family Communication Quality and Well-Being in Hong Kong.一项关于新冠病毒信息分享的人口研究:香港的社会人口差异,以及与家庭沟通质量和幸福感的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3577. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063577.
8
Analysis of the quality of meningioma education resources available on the Internet.互联网上脑膜瘤教育资源的质量分析。
Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Nov 30;8(2):129-136. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa082. eCollection 2021 Apr.
9
Uses of Personal Health Records for Communication Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors, Caregivers, and Providers: Interview and Observational Study in a Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory.个人健康记录在结直肠癌幸存者、护理人员和医疗服务提供者之间的沟通中的应用:在人机交互实验室进行的访谈和观察性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jan 25;9(1):e16447. doi: 10.2196/16447.
10
Email Patient-Provider Communication and Cancer Screenings Among US Adults: Cross-sectional Study.美国成年人电子邮件患者-医疗服务提供者沟通与癌症筛查:横断面研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Jul 30;7(3):e23790. doi: 10.2196/23790.

本文引用的文献

1
Can e-mail messages between patients and physicians be patient-centered?患者与医生之间的电子邮件信息能以患者为中心吗?
Health Commun. 2008;23(1):80-6. doi: 10.1080/10410230701807295.
2
Patient-physician e-mail: an opportunity to transform pediatric health care delivery.患者与医生之间的电子邮件:转变儿科医疗服务的契机。
Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):701-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1094.
3
Patient access to U.S. physicians who conduct internet or e-mail consults.患者接触进行互联网或电子邮件咨询的美国医生的机会。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Mar;22(3):378-81. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0076-1.
4
For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: a systematic review.医生使用互联网的目的和原因是什么:一项系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Jan;77(1):4-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
5
Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians' patient-centred communication matter?患者参与专科医疗会诊:医生以患者为中心的沟通是否重要?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.011. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
6
Use of email in a family practice setting: opportunities and challenges in patient- and physician-initiated communication.电子邮件在家庭医疗环境中的应用:患者与医生发起沟通的机遇与挑战
BMC Med. 2006 Aug 15;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-18.
7
Prevalence of basic information technology use by U.S. physicians.美国医生使用基础信息技术的情况
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Nov;21(11):1150-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00571.x.
8
Physician-patient communication: a study on the observed behaviours of specialty physicians and the ways their patients perceive them.医患沟通:一项关于专科医生观察到的行为及其患者对他们的认知方式的研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.010. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
9
Physicians' use of email with patients: factors influencing electronic communication and adherence to best practices.医生与患者之间电子邮件的使用:影响电子通信及遵循最佳实践的因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Mar 24;8(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.1.e2.
10
The relation between health-orientation, provider-patient communication, and satisfaction: an individual-difference approach.健康导向、医患沟通与满意度之间的关系:一种个体差异研究方法。
Health Commun. 2005;18(3):291-303. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1803_6.