• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1971 - 1972年至1999 - 2004年间美国近视患病率上升。

Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004.

作者信息

Vitale Susan, Sperduto Robert D, Ferris Frederick L

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Room 10D45, Mail Stop 1863, Bethesda, MD 20892-1863, USA.

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;127(12):1632-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303.

DOI:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303
PMID:20008719
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare US population prevalence estimates for myopia in 1971-1972 and 1999-2004.

METHODS

The 1971-1972 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provided the earliest nationally representative estimates for US myopia prevalence; myopia was diagnosed by an algorithm using either lensometry, pinhole visual acuity, and presenting visual acuity (for presenting visual acuity > or =20/40) or retinoscopy (for presenting visual acuity < or =20/50). Using a similar method for diagnosing myopia, we examined data from the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to determine whether myopia prevalence had changed during the 30 years between the 2 surveys.

RESULTS

Using the 1971-1972 method, the estimated prevalence of myopia in persons aged 12 to 54 years was significantly higher in 1999-2004 than in 1971-1972 (41.6% vs 25.0%, respectively; P < .001). Prevalence estimates were higher in 1999-2004 than in 1971-1972 for black individuals (33.5% vs 13.0%, respectively; P < .001) and white individuals (43.0% vs 26.3%, respectively; P < .001) and for all levels of myopia severity (>-2.0 diopters [D]: 17.5% vs 13.4%, respectively [P < .001]; < or =-2.0 to >-7.9 D: 22.4% vs 11.4%, respectively [P < .001]; < or =-7.9 D: 1.6% vs 0.2%, respectively [P < .001]).

CONCLUSIONS

When using similar methods for each period, the prevalence of myopia in the United States appears to be substantially higher in 1999-2004 than 30 years earlier. Identifying modifiable risk factors for myopia could lead to the development of cost-effective interventional strategies.

摘要

目的

比较1971 - 1972年和1999 - 2004年美国人群近视患病率的估计值。

方法

1971 - 1972年的全国健康与营养检查调查提供了美国最早具有全国代表性的近视患病率估计值;近视通过一种算法诊断,该算法使用验光仪、针孔视力和当前视力(当前视力≥20/40)或视网膜检影法(当前视力≤20/50)。我们使用类似的近视诊断方法,检查了1999 - 2004年全国健康与营养检查调查的数据,以确定在这两次调查间隔的30年中近视患病率是否发生了变化。

结果

采用1971 - 1972年的方法,1999 - 2004年12至54岁人群的近视估计患病率显著高于1971 - 1972年(分别为41.6%和25.0%;P <.001)。1999 - 2004年黑人个体(分别为33.5%和13.0%;P <.001)、白人个体(分别为43.0%和26.3%;P <.001)以及所有近视严重程度水平(>-2.0屈光度[D]:分别为17.5%和13.4%[P <.001];≤ -2.0至>-7.9 D:分别为22.4%和11.4%[P <.001];≤ -7.9 D:分别为1.6%和0.2%[P <.001])的患病率估计值均高于1971 - 1972年。

结论

当每个时期使用类似方法时,1999 - 2004年美国的近视患病率似乎比30年前大幅升高。确定近视的可改变危险因素可能会促成具有成本效益的干预策略的制定。

相似文献

1
Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004.1971 - 1972年至1999 - 2004年间美国近视患病率上升。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;127(12):1632-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303.
2
Disparities in visual impairment by immigrant status in the United States.美国不同移民身份人群在视力损害方面的差异。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;158(4):800-807.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
3
The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia.美国、西欧和澳大利亚成年人屈光不正的患病率。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):495-505. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.495.
4
Vision Impairment and Blindness Prevalence in the United States: Variability of Vision Health Responses across Multiple National Surveys.美国的视力障碍和失明患病率:多项国家调查中视力健康反应的变异性。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Jan;128(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.06.064. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
5
Refractive Errors in Koreans: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008-2012.韩国人的屈光不正:2008 - 2012年韩国国家健康与营养检查调查
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun;30(3):214-24. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2016.30.3.214. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Refractive errors and visual acuity impairment among self-selected Hispanic, white, and black adults examined by the UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic.由加州大学洛杉矶分校移动眼科诊所检查的自我选择的西班牙裔、白人和黑人成年人中的屈光不正和视力损害。
J Am Optom Assoc. 1999 Nov;70(11):724-34.
7
Heritability of refractive error and familial aggregation of myopia in an elderly American population.美国老年人群屈光不正的遗传度及近视的家族聚集性
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 May;46(5):1588-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0740.
8
Ethnic disparity in prevalence and associated risk factors of myopia in adolescents.青少年近视患病率及相关危险因素的种族差异。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Jan;119(1 Pt 1):134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
9
Prevalence of neutropenia in the U.S. population: age, sex, smoking status, and ethnic differences.美国人群中性粒细胞减少症的患病率:年龄、性别、吸烟状况及种族差异。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):486-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-7-200704030-00004.
10
Prevalence of uncorrected binocular distance visual acuity in Hispanic and non-Hispanic adults. Results from the HHANES and the NHANES I.西班牙裔和非西班牙裔成年人未矫正双眼远距离视力的患病率。来自西班牙裔健康与营养检查调查(HHANES)和第一次美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES I)的结果。
Ophthalmology. 1998 Mar;105(3):552-60. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)93042-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural OCT Changes Following Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy for Myopia Prevention.重复低强度红光疗法预防近视后的光学相干断层扫描结构变化
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.2767.
2
Child Myopia Prevalence in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.欧洲儿童近视患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Children (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;12(6):771. doi: 10.3390/children12060771.
3
Development of risk prediction model for small incision lenticule extraction.小切口透镜切除术风险预测模型的开发
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 30;12:1518889. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1518889. eCollection 2025.
4
How Have Animal Models Increased our Understanding of Human Myopia?动物模型如何增进了我们对人类近视的理解?
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jun 5;66(7):2. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.7.2.
5
Access to Myopia Care in the United States-A Narrative Review.美国近视护理服务——一篇叙述性综述
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jun 5;66(7):5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.7.5.
6
Childhood Myopia Part I: Contemporary Treatment Options.儿童近视 第一部分:当代治疗选择
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jun 5;66(7):6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.7.6.
7
Biometric risk factors for myopia onset in emmetropic school-age children.正视学龄儿童近视发病的生物统计学危险因素。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s10384-025-01222-2.
8
Clinical Features and Natural Progression of Unilateral High Myopia in Adults: A Comparison Study.成人单侧高度近视的临床特征与自然进展:一项比较研究。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Apr 1;5(5):100780. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100780. eCollection 2025 Sep-Oct.
9
Refractive Error and Axial Length (REAL) Study: Feasibility of a population study in the United States.屈光不正与眼轴长度(REAL)研究:在美国进行一项人群研究的可行性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2025 May 1;102(5):280-288. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002258. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
10
Updated study on demographic and ocular biometric characteristics of cataract patients indicates new trends in cataract surgery.关于白内障患者人口统计学和眼部生物特征的最新研究表明了白内障手术的新趋势。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;15(1):17289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02311-5.