Stanhope Victoria, Tondora Janis, Davidson Larry, Choy-Brown Mimi, Marcus Steven C
Silver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Program for Recovery and Community Health, Yale University School of Medicine, 19 Peck Street, Building One, New Haven, CT, 06513, USA.
Trials. 2015 Apr 22;16:180. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0715-0.
Service disengagement is a pervasive challenge the mental health care system faces. Mental health services are of little value should persons with mental illnesses continue to opt out of receiving them. Consumers attribute disengagement from care to an absence of choice in their treatment. In response, the mental health system is adopting a person-centered model, based upon recovery principles, to engage consumers more actively in their care. Person-centered care planning is a promising practice involving collaboration to develop and implement an actionable plan to assist the person in achieving personal recovery goals.
METHODS/DESIGN: This study design combines a parallel-group randomized controlled trial of community mental health organizations with qualitative methods to assess the effectiveness of person-centered care planning. Participants at 14 sites in Delaware and Connecticut will be randomized to treatment as usual or the person-centered care planning intervention. Participants will be in leadership (n = 70) or supervisory or direct care (n = 210) roles. The person-centered care planning intervention involves intensive staff training and 12 months of ongoing technical assistance. Quantitative survey data will be collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months measuring person-centered care planning competency and organizational factors. Consumer outcomes (engagement, medication adherence, functioning and consumer satisfaction) will be assessed by Medicaid and state-level data. Qualitative data focused on process factors will include staff and consumer interviews and focus groups. In this intent-to-treat analysis, we will use mixed-effects multivariate regression models to evaluate the differential impact of the person-centered care planning intervention on each consumer and implementation outcome as well as the extent to which clinician assessments of organizational factors are associated with the implementation outcome. Mixed methods will triangulate and strengthen the interpretation of outcomes.
The aim of this study is to generate valuable guidance for state systems engaged in scale-up and transformation efforts. Targeted staff selection for training to support sustainability will serve to provide further insight into important intervention implementation strategies. Person-centered care planning has the potential to enhance the impact of all evidence-based and recovery-oriented practices and bring practice into line with the emerging national guidelines in health care reform.
This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02299492) on 21 November 2014 as New York University Protocol Record PCCP-13-9762, Person-Centered Care Planning and Service Engagement.
服务脱离是精神卫生保健系统面临的一个普遍挑战。如果患有精神疾病的人继续选择不接受精神卫生服务,那么这些服务就毫无价值。消费者将脱离治疗归因于治疗中缺乏选择。作为回应,精神卫生系统正在采用一种基于康复原则的以患者为中心的模式,以便让消费者更积极地参与到他们的治疗中。以患者为中心的护理计划是一种很有前景的做法,它涉及合作制定并实施一项可行的计划,以帮助患者实现个人康复目标。
方法/设计:本研究设计将社区精神卫生组织的平行组随机对照试验与定性方法相结合,以评估以患者为中心的护理计划的有效性。特拉华州和康涅狄格州14个地点的参与者将被随机分配到常规治疗组或以患者为中心的护理计划干预组。参与者将担任领导角色(n = 70)或监督或直接护理角色(n = 210)。以患者为中心的护理计划干预包括强化的工作人员培训和为期12个月的持续技术援助。将在基线、6个月和12个月时收集定量调查数据,以测量以患者为中心的护理计划能力和组织因素。消费者的结果(参与度、药物依从性、功能和消费者满意度)将通过医疗补助和州级数据进行评估。关注过程因素的定性数据将包括工作人员和消费者访谈以及焦点小组。在这项意向性分析中,我们将使用混合效应多元回归模型来评估以患者为中心的护理计划干预对每个消费者和实施结果的不同影响,以及临床医生对组织因素的评估与实施结果相关的程度。混合方法将对结果进行三角测量并加强对结果的解释。
本研究的目的是为参与扩大规模和转型努力的州系统提供有价值的指导。有针对性地挑选工作人员进行培训以支持可持续性,将有助于进一步深入了解重要的干预实施策略。以患者为中心的护理计划有可能增强所有基于证据和以康复为导向的做法的影响,并使实践符合医疗改革中新兴的国家指导方针。
本试验于2014年11月21日在ClinicalTrials.gov(标识符:NCT02299492)注册,登记名称为纽约大学方案记录PCCP - 13 - 9762,以患者为中心的护理计划与服务参与。