Suppr超能文献

急性腹泻病婴儿的再喂养

Refeeding of infants with acute diarrheal disease.

作者信息

Lifshitz F, Fagundes Neto U, Garcia Olivo C A, Cordano A, Friedman S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, North Shore University Hospital, Cornell University Medical College, Manhasset, NY 11030.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1991 Apr;118(4 Pt 2):S99-108. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81435-0.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine which infant formula among five would be the most efficacious for the refeeding of infants during an acute episode of diarrhea. Fifty male infants less than 12 months of age with severe diarrhea and at least 5% dehydration were admitted to a metabolic unit and studied in a prospective, single-blind protocol. Ten infants randomly received one of five types of formula: two-thirds diluted cow milk, cow milk formula (Nanon, Nestle, Inc., São Paulo, Brazil), Portagen, Pregestimil, or Prosobee (Mead Johnson & Co. Division, Evansville, Ind.). They continued to receive the same formula for 72 hours unless dehydration occurred. There were no associated infections, and they received no prior antibiotic treatment. Oral hydration together with intravenous fluid therapy was given to all patients during the initial treatment. During the first 72 hours of refeeding, patients fed Portagen excreted the least amount of stool and required reduced quantities of intravenous fluids or oral hydration. In contrast, patients fed diluted cow milk or any other formula had more severe diarrhea. Nine of the 10 patients fed Portagen completed the 72-hour treatment, whereas only 2 of 10 fed diluted cow milk tolerated it. Similarly, the cumulative proportions for high purging rate, dehydration, carbohydrate intolerance, and vomiting were more favorable for Portagen and least acceptable for diluted cow milk. No differences were found among the remaining three formulas tested. These data show that diluted cow milk is poorly tolerated by infants with severe diarrhea, whereas Portagen is more effective.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定五种婴儿配方奶粉中哪一种对腹泻急性期婴儿的再喂养最有效。五十名年龄小于12个月、患有严重腹泻且脱水至少5%的男婴被收入一个代谢单元,并按照前瞻性、单盲方案进行研究。十名婴儿随机接受五种配方奶粉中的一种:三分之二稀释的牛奶、牛奶配方奶粉(Nanon,雀巢公司,巴西圣保罗)、Portagen、Pregestimil或Prosobee(美赞臣公司,印第安纳州埃文斯维尔)。除非出现脱水,他们在72小时内持续接受同一种配方奶粉。无相关感染,且他们之前未接受过抗生素治疗。初始治疗期间,所有患者均接受口服补液及静脉补液治疗。在再喂养的最初72小时内,喂养Portagen的患者排出的粪便量最少,且所需静脉补液或口服补液量减少。相比之下,喂养稀释牛奶或任何其他配方奶粉的患者腹泻更严重。喂养Portagen的10名患者中有9名完成了72小时的治疗,而喂养稀释牛奶的10名患者中只有2名耐受。同样,Portagen在高腹泻率、脱水、碳水化合物不耐受和呕吐方面的累积比例更有利,而稀释牛奶最不可接受。在所测试的其余三种配方奶粉之间未发现差异。这些数据表明,严重腹泻的婴儿对稀释牛奶耐受性差,而Portagen更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验