Departamento de Análisis Instrumental, Departamento de Bromatología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 237, Concepción, Chile.
Anal Chim Acta. 2010 Feb 15;660(1-2):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
Ochratoxin A is a mycotoxin widely studied due to its nephrotoxic, immunotoxic, teratogenic and carcinogenic effects. The European Commission has fixed maximum limits for Ochratoxin A in wines and in other foods. In order to determine Ochratoxin A levels in red wine, the present paper contrasts and discusses the results of a systematic study of analytical parameters for sample pre-treatment using different immunoaffinity cartridges as well as C-18 cartridges with three solvent combinations. The direct injection of wine into two types of C-18 chromatographic columns (conventional packed column and monolithic column) is evaluated as screening method. In all cases, the analysis was carried out using HPLC with fluorescence detection. The results show statistical differences when 3 types of immunoaffinity columns were used, while higher recoveries were obtained for C-18 cartridges using acetonitrile as extraction solvent. Repeatability and accuracy of immunoaffinity and C-18 sample pre-treatment were statistically comparable (alpha=0.05). Their sensitivity was also comparable, although more favorable detection limits were obtained using the immunoaffinity treatment (0.01 microg L(-1)) in comparison with C-18 treatment (0.09 microg L(-1)). Considering the maximal allowed concentration of Ochratoxin A in wine (2.00 microg L(-1)), both methods are suitable for its determination in wine. Both methods were applied to determine this toxin in 154 wine samples, and the quantitative results demonstrated statistic comparability (alpha=0.05). These results were also confirmed from the qualitative point of view using a GC-MS method. To find an easy screening method, based on a recent publication, a monolithic HPLC column and 2 conventional packed columns were tested for Ochratoxin A determination in real wine samples by direct injection, without previous clean-up. The results show that this procedure is not useful at the concentration levels usually found in wine and although shorter time is required when using the monolithic columns even with the chromatographic analysis. Finally, based on the results, it was concluded that the combination of C-18 cartridges with conventional particle packed columns and HPLC-FLD is the most appropriate alternative for Ochratoxin A analysis in wine. Indeed, considering cost, sensitivity and selectivity, this method can be used in broad prospective programs.
赭曲霉毒素 A 是一种广泛研究的真菌毒素,因其具有肾毒性、免疫毒性、致畸性和致癌性而备受关注。 欧盟委员会已经为葡萄酒和其他食品中的赭曲霉毒素 A 设定了最大限量。 为了测定红葡萄酒中的赭曲霉毒素 A 含量,本文对比并讨论了使用不同免疫亲和柱和 C-18 柱以及三种溶剂组合对样品预处理分析参数进行系统研究的结果。 直接将葡萄酒注入两种类型的 C-18 色谱柱(常规填充柱和整体柱)作为筛选方法进行评估。 在所有情况下,均使用 HPLC 荧光检测法进行分析。 使用 3 种免疫亲和柱时结果存在统计学差异,而使用乙腈作为提取溶剂时 C-18 柱的回收率更高。 免疫亲和柱和 C-18 样品预处理的重复性和准确性在统计学上具有可比性(α=0.05)。 它们的灵敏度也具有可比性,尽管使用免疫亲和处理(0.01μg/L)获得了更有利的检测限(0.01μg/L),而 C-18 处理(0.09μg/L)获得了更有利的检测限。 考虑到葡萄酒中赭曲霉毒素 A 的最大允许浓度(2.00μg/L),这两种方法均适用于葡萄酒中该毒素的测定。 这两种方法均应用于测定 154 个葡萄酒样品中的这种毒素,定量结果具有统计学可比性(α=0.05)。 从定性角度使用 GC-MS 方法也证实了这些结果。 为了找到一种基于最近发表的文献的简便筛选方法,在实际葡萄酒样品中,未经预先净化,直接对整体 HPLC 柱和 2 根常规填充柱进行了赭曲霉毒素 A 测定。 结果表明,该程序在葡萄酒中通常发现的浓度水平下并不有用,尽管使用整体柱时所需的时间更短,即使在色谱分析中也是如此。 最后,基于结果得出结论,C-18 柱与常规颗粒填充柱和 HPLC-FLD 的组合是分析葡萄酒中赭曲霉毒素 A 的最合适替代方法。 实际上,考虑到成本、灵敏度和选择性,该方法可广泛用于前瞻性计划。