• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Adverse reactions to blood donations: the READ project.献血不良反应:READ 项目。
Blood Transfus. 2010 Jan;8(1):49-62. doi: 10.2450/2009.0089-09.
2
Risk factors for complications in donors at first and repeat whole blood donation: a cohort study with assessment of the impact on donor return.首次和重复全血捐献者并发症的风险因素:队列研究评估对供者回归的影响
Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s28-36. doi: 10.2450/2013.0262-12. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
3
[Delayed adverse reactions to blood donation: From haemovigilance data to specific studies].[献血的延迟不良反应:从血液监测数据到专项研究]
Transfus Clin Biol. 2016 Nov;23(4):233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
4
Complications of blood donation reported to haemovigilance systems: analysis of eleven years of international surveillance.向血液警戒系统报告的献血并发症:十一年国际监测分析
Vox Sang. 2021 Jul;116(6):628-636. doi: 10.1111/vox.13048. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
5
Blood donors--Serious adverse reactions (SAR) 2010-2014 EFS Châteauroux, France.献血者——2010 - 2014年严重不良反应(SAR),法国沙托鲁埃夫斯血液中心
Transfus Clin Biol. 2015 Jun;22(2):62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
[Incidents of blood donation].[献血事件]
Transfus Clin Biol. 2005 Jun;12(2):153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2005.04.003.
7
Adverse reactions in blood and apheresis donors: experience from two Italian transfusion centres.血液及单采献血者的不良反应:来自两个意大利输血中心的经验
Blood Transfus. 2009 Jan;7(1):35-8. doi: 10.2450/2008.0018-08.
8
Adverse reactions in whole blood donors: an Indian scenario.全血献血者的不良反应:印度情况。
Blood Transfus. 2011 Jan;9(1):46-9. doi: 10.2450/2010.0002-10. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
9
Vasovagal reactions in whole blood and apheresis donors: a cross-sectional study on donor haemovigilance data from 2016 to 2019 in Italy.意大利 2016 年至 2019 年全血和单采献血者献血不良反应的横断面研究:基于献血不良反应监测数据
Blood Transfus. 2022 Jul;20(4):281-291. doi: 10.2450/2021.0114-21. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
10
Blood donor haemovigilance in Yaoundé, Cameroon.喀麦隆雅温得的献血者血液监测
Transfus Med. 2012 Aug;22(4):257-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01161.x. Epub 2012 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of adverse reaction in blood donation: a systematic review.献血不良反应发生率:一项系统评价
Am J Blood Res. 2020 Oct 15;10(5):145-150. eCollection 2020.
2
Joint effects of risk factors on adverse events associated with adult blood donations.风险因素对成人献血相关不良事件的联合影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17758. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017758.
3
A Study on the Effect of Pre-donation Salt Loading on Vasovagal Reactions in Young College Going Whole Blood Donors.献血前盐负荷对年轻大学生全血献血者血管迷走神经反应影响的研究
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2017 Dec;33(4):592-597. doi: 10.1007/s12288-017-0787-y. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
4
Incidence, predictors and severity of adverse events among whole blood donors.全血捐献者不良事件的发生率、预测因素及严重程度。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 21;12(7):e0179831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179831. eCollection 2017.
5
Relationship between blood donors' iron status and their age, body mass index and donation frequency.献血者的铁状态与其年龄、体重指数及献血频率之间的关系。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2013;131(6):377-83. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.1316554.
6
Blood and blood-associated symbols beyond medicine and transfusion: far more complex than first appears.医学和输血领域之外的血液及与血液相关的符号:远比初看起来复杂得多。
Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12(1):14-21. doi: 10.2450/2013.0131-13. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
7
Prospective multicentre study of the effect of voluntary plasmapheresis on plasma cholesterol levels in donors.前瞻性多中心研究自愿血浆置换对供体血浆胆固醇水平的影响。
Vox Sang. 2013 Aug;105(2):108-15. doi: 10.1111/vox.12031. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
8
Vasovagal reactions in whole blood donors at three REDS-II blood centers in Brazil.巴西三个 REDS-II 血液中心全血献血者的血管迷走神经反应。
Transfusion. 2012 May;52(5):1070-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03432.x. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
9
Adverse reactions in whole blood donors: an Indian scenario.全血献血者的不良反应:印度情况。
Blood Transfus. 2011 Jan;9(1):46-9. doi: 10.2450/2010.0002-10. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
10
Gender differences in giving blood: a review of the literature.性别与献血:文献综述。
Blood Transfus. 2010 Oct;8(4):278-87. doi: 10.2450/2010.0156-09.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse reactions in blood and apheresis donors: experience from two Italian transfusion centres.血液及单采献血者的不良反应:来自两个意大利输血中心的经验
Blood Transfus. 2009 Jan;7(1):35-8. doi: 10.2450/2008.0018-08.
2
The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006.美国红十字会献血者血液监测项目:2006年报告的献血并发症
Transfusion. 2008 Sep;48(9):1809-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01811.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
3
Blood donor satisfaction and intention of future donation.献血者满意度及未来献血意向。
Transfusion. 2008 Apr;48(4):742-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01600.x. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
4
The blood donation experience: self-reported motives and obstacles for donating blood.献血经历:自我报告的献血动机与障碍
Vox Sang. 2008 Jan;94(1):56-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00990.x.
5
Complications related to blood donation: a population-based study.与献血相关的并发症:一项基于人群的研究。
Vox Sang. 2008 Feb;94(2):132-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.01000.x. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
6
The effect of whole-blood donor adverse events on blood donor return rates.全血捐献者不良事件对献血者回访率的影响。
Transfusion. 2006 Aug;46(8):1374-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00905.x.
7
Donor reactions in high-school donors: the effects of sex, weight, and collection volume.高中献血者的献血反应:性别、体重和采血量的影响。
Transfusion. 2006 Feb;46(2):284-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00713.x.
8
A case-controlled multicenter study of vasovagal reactions in blood donors: influence of sex, age, donation status, weight, blood pressure, and pulse.献血者血管迷走神经反应的病例对照多中心研究:性别、年龄、献血状态、体重、血压和脉搏的影响
Transfusion. 1999 Mar;39(3):316-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39399219291.x.

献血不良反应:READ 项目。

Adverse reactions to blood donations: the READ project.

机构信息

SIMT Azienda Ospedaliera Ragusa, Italy.

出版信息

Blood Transfus. 2010 Jan;8(1):49-62. doi: 10.2450/2009.0089-09.

DOI:10.2450/2009.0089-09
PMID:20104279
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2809512/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2006 in Italy 2,404,267 donations of blood components were made by 1,539,454 donors; approximately 55% of the donations were collected directly by Transfusion Structures (TS), while about 45% were collected in Donation Centres managed by Associations and Federations of Donors. The aim of the READ (Rilevamento Eventi Avversi alla Donazione) project is to create a network of TS to test a standardised system for monitoring adverse events (AE) related to blood donations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Shared, standardised data collection forms, compatible with the forms produced by the ISBT-EHN, were prepared. Two types of form were used: (i) a form to collect data on single events (READ 1), to be used at the individual collection sites; (ii) a form for processing the data collected by each TS (READ 2).

RESULTS

Between February and August 2008 six TS collected data related to the donation of 89,332 units of blood. Overall, 523 AE were recorded. The AE occurred in 0.59% of the donations. The mean duration of the symptoms was 17 minutes. Fifteen percent of the symptoms were related to the venipuncture (mainly haematomas) and 77% to vasovagal AE. The AE were defined severe (grade C) in 47 cases. The donations in which AE were recorded were completed in 81% of the cases; 59% of the AE did not require treatment. Three donors were monitored briefly (for less than 4 hours) in hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of standardised forms enabled the collection of data that could be analysed. Some problems related to the performance of the haemovigilance programme did, however, emerge: (i) organisational problems, (ii) limited sensitivity, (iii) inadequate training, and (iv) poorly defined responsibilities. These problems must be resolved at various levels: local, regional and national.

摘要

背景

2006 年,意大利共有 1539454 名献血者进行了 2404267 次血液成分捐献;其中约 55%的捐献是由输血机构(TS)直接采集的,而约 45%是在由献血者协会和联合会管理的献血中心采集的。READ(献血不良反应监测)项目的目的是建立一个 TS 网络,以测试一种用于监测与献血相关的不良事件(AE)的标准化系统。

材料和方法

准备了共享的、标准化的数据收集表格,与 ISBT-EHN 生成的表格兼容。使用了两种类型的表格:(i)用于收集单个事件数据的表格(READ 1),用于在各个采集点使用;(ii)用于处理每个 TS 收集的数据的表格(READ 2)。

结果

2008 年 2 月至 8 月期间,6 个 TS 收集了与 89332 单位血液捐献相关的数据。总体而言,记录了 523 例 AE。AE 的发生率为 0.59%。症状的平均持续时间为 17 分钟。15%的症状与静脉穿刺(主要是血肿)有关,77%与血管迷走性 AE 有关。AE 被定义为严重(C 级)的有 47 例。记录 AE 的捐献中有 81%完成;59%的 AE 不需要治疗。有 3 名献血者在医院接受了短暂(不到 4 小时)的监测。

结论

使用标准化表格能够收集可分析的数据。然而,血液监测计划的执行也出现了一些问题:(i)组织问题,(ii)敏感性有限,(iii)培训不足,以及(iv)责任界定不明确。这些问题必须在各个层面上解决:地方、区域和国家。