• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遮挡问题很难:比较婴儿和成人对可见与隐藏物体的预测性伸手动作。

Occlusion is hard: Comparing predictive reaching for visible and hidden objects in infants and adults.

作者信息

Hespos Susan, Gredebäck Gustaf, von Hofsten Claes, Spelke Elizabeth S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2009 Nov 1;33(8):1483-1502. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01051.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01051.x
PMID:20111668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2811960/
Abstract

Infants can anticipate the future location of a moving object and execute a predictive reach to intercept the object. When a moving object is temporarily hidden by darkness or occlusion, 6-month-old infants' reaching is perturbed but performance on darkness trials is significantly better than occlusion trials. How does this reaching behavior change over development? Experiment 1 tested predictive reaching of 6- and 9-month-old infants. While there was an increase in the overall number of reaches with increasing age, there were significantly fewer predictive reaches during the occlusion compared to visible trials and no age-related changes in this pattern. The decrease in performance found in Experiment 1 is likely to apply not only to the object representations formed by infants but also those formed by adults. In Experiment 2 we tested adults with a similar reaching task. Like infants, the adults were most accurate when the target was continuously visible and performance in darkness trials was significantly better than occlusion trials, providing evidence that there is something specific about occlusion that makes it more difficult than merely lack of visibility. Together, these findings suggest that infants' and adults' capacities to represent objects have similar signatures throughout development.

摘要

婴儿能够预测移动物体的未来位置,并执行预测性伸手动作以拦截该物体。当移动物体被黑暗或遮挡物暂时遮挡时,6个月大婴儿的伸手动作会受到干扰,但在黑暗试验中的表现明显优于遮挡试验。这种伸手行为在发育过程中是如何变化的呢?实验1测试了6个月和9个月大婴儿的预测性伸手动作。虽然随着年龄增长,伸手动作的总数有所增加,但与可见试验相比,在遮挡期间的预测性伸手动作明显更少,且这种模式没有与年龄相关的变化。实验1中发现的表现下降可能不仅适用于婴儿形成的物体表征,也适用于成人形成的物体表征。在实验2中,我们用类似的伸手任务测试了成人。与婴儿一样,当目标持续可见时,成人的表现最为准确,黑暗试验中的表现明显优于遮挡试验,这表明遮挡存在一些特殊之处,使其比仅仅缺乏可见性更难。这些发现共同表明,婴儿和成人在整个发育过程中表征物体的能力具有相似的特征。

相似文献

1
Occlusion is hard: Comparing predictive reaching for visible and hidden objects in infants and adults.遮挡问题很难:比较婴儿和成人对可见与隐藏物体的预测性伸手动作。
Cogn Sci. 2009 Nov 1;33(8):1483-1502. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01051.x.
2
The sound of darkness: why do auditory cues aid infants' search for objects hidden by darkness but not by visible occluders?黑暗中的声音:为什么听觉线索有助于婴儿寻找被黑暗隐藏而非被可见遮挡物隐藏的物体?
Dev Psychol. 2008 Nov;44(6):1715-25. doi: 10.1037/a0012836.
3
Infants' representations of three-dimensional occluded objects.婴儿对三维遮挡物体的表现。
Infant Behav Dev. 2010 Dec;33(4):663-71. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.09.002.
4
Reasoning about a hidden object after a delay: evidence for robust representations in 5-month-old infants.延迟后对隐藏物体的推理:5个月大婴儿中稳健表征的证据。
Cognition. 2003 Jul;88(3):B23-32. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00045-3.
5
Anticipatory reaching of seven- to eleven-month-old infants in occlusion situations.7 至 11 个月大的婴儿在遮挡情境下的预期伸手动作。
Infant Behav Dev. 2011 Feb;34(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
6
Sound effects: Multimodal input helps infants find displaced objects.音效:多模态输入帮助婴儿找到移位的物体。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2017 Sep;35(3):317-333. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12165. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
Limits on Infants' Ability to Dynamically Update Object Representations.婴儿动态更新物体表征能力的限制。
Infancy. 2009 Mar 4;14(2):244-262. doi: 10.1080/15250000802707096. Epub 2009 Mar 1.
8
Infants' Evolving Representations of Object Motion During Occlusion: A Longitudinal Study of 6- to 12-Month-Old Infants.遮挡期间婴儿对物体运动的逐渐形成的表征:一项对6至12个月大婴儿的纵向研究。
Infancy. 2004 Sep;6(2):165-184. doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0602_2. Epub 2004 Sep 1.
9
2.5-month-old infants' reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded.2.5个月大婴儿关于物体何时应被遮挡以及何时不应被遮挡的推理。
Cogn Psychol. 1999 Sep;39(2):116-57. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0717.
10
Infants chunk object arrays into sets of individuals.婴儿将对象数组分成一个个的集合。
Cognition. 2004 Mar;91(2):173-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of "rescue saccades" on the accuracy of tracking multiple moving targets: An eye-tracking study on the effects of target occlusions.“拯救性扫视”对跟踪多个移动目标准确性的影响:目标遮挡对眼动追踪影响的研究。
J Vis. 2020 Nov 2;20(12):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.12.5.
2
The sticky mittens paradigm: A critical appraisal of current results and explanations.粘性手套范式:对当前结果和解释的批判性评价。
Dev Sci. 2021 Sep;24(5):e13036. doi: 10.1111/desc.13036. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
Pupillometric VoE paradigm reveals that 18- but not 10-month-olds spontaneously represent occluded objects (but not empty sets).

本文引用的文献

1
Infants' Evolving Representations of Object Motion During Occlusion: A Longitudinal Study of 6- to 12-Month-Old Infants.遮挡期间婴儿对物体运动的逐渐形成的表征:一项对6至12个月大婴儿的纵向研究。
Infancy. 2004 Sep;6(2):165-184. doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0602_2. Epub 2004 Sep 1.
2
A simple proximity heuristic allows tracking of multiple objects through occlusion.一种简单的邻近启发式方法允许通过遮挡来跟踪多个物体。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 May;74(4):691-702. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0265-9.
3
How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism.
瞳孔测量的 VoE 范式表明,18 个月大的婴儿而非 10 个月大的婴儿会自发地对被遮挡的物体(而不是空集)进行表征。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0230913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230913. eCollection 2020.
4
Prediction in infants and adults: A pupillometry study.婴儿和成人的预测:瞳孔测量研究。
Dev Sci. 2019 Jul;22(4):e12780. doi: 10.1111/desc.12780. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
5
Action Prediction Allows Hypothesis Testing via Internal Forward Models at 6 Months of Age.动作预测使6个月大的婴儿能够通过内部前向模型进行假设检验。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 12;9:290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00290. eCollection 2018.
6
The Effects of Visual Discriminability and Rotation Angle on 30-Month-Olds' Search Performance in Spatial Rotation Tasks.视觉辨别能力和旋转角度对30个月大婴儿在空间旋转任务中搜索表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 20;7:1648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01648. eCollection 2016.
7
Sensitive perception of a person's direction of walking by 4-year-old children.4 岁儿童对人行走方向的敏感感知。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Nov;49(11):2120-4. doi: 10.1037/a0031714. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
8
The development of grasping comprehension in infancy: covert shifts of attention caused by referential actions.婴儿期抓握理解的发展:参照动作引起的隐蔽注意力转移。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jan;208(2):297-307. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2479-9. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
9
Young infants' actions reveal their developing knowledge of support variables: converging evidence for violation-of-expectation findings.幼儿的行为揭示了他们对支撑变量的逐渐发展的认知:对违背预期结果的研究的汇聚性证据。
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):304-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
你能追踪多少个物体?关于资源有限的注意力追踪机制的证据。
J Vis. 2007 Oct 30;7(13):14.1-10. doi: 10.1167/7.13.14.
4
Taking an action perspective on infant's object representations.从行动视角看待婴儿的客体表征。
Prog Brain Res. 2007;164:265-82. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)64015-1.
5
Young infants' actions reveal their developing knowledge of support variables: converging evidence for violation-of-expectation findings.幼儿的行为揭示了他们对支撑变量的逐渐发展的认知:对违背预期结果的研究的汇聚性证据。
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):304-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
6
What do two-year-olds understand about hidden-object events?两岁的孩子对隐藏物体事件了解多少?
Dev Psychol. 2006 Mar;42(2):263-71. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.263.
7
Object boundaries influence toddlers' performance in a search task.物体边界会影响幼儿在搜索任务中的表现。
Dev Sci. 2006 Jan;9(1):97-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00466.x.
8
Décalage in infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: converging evidence from action tasks.婴儿对遮挡和容纳事件认知的发展差异:来自动作任务的趋同证据
Cognition. 2006 Mar;99(2):B31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.010. Epub 2005 Jun 6.
9
Continuities and discontinuities in infants' representation of objects and events.
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2004;32:243-79. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(04)80009-0.
10
'Core knowledges': a dissociation between spatiotemporal knowledge and contact-mechanics in a non-human primate?“核心知识”:非人类灵长类动物的时空知识与接触力学之间的分离?
Dev Sci. 2004 Apr;7(2):167-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00335.x.