Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Feb;82(2):270-8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0220.
Effective handwashing with soap requires reliable access to water supplies. However, more than three billion persons do not have household-level access to piped water. This research addresses the challenge of improving hand hygiene within water-constrained environments. The antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizer, a waterless hand hygiene product, was evaluated and compared with handwashing with soap and water in field conditions in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Hand sanitizer use by mothers resulted in 0.66 and 0.64 log reductions per hand of Escherichia coli and fecal streptococci, respectively. In comparison, handwashing with soap resulted in 0.50 and 0.25 log reductions per hand of E. coli and fecal streptococci, respectively. Hand sanitizer was significantly better than handwashing with respect to reduction in levels of fecal streptococci (P = 0.01). The feasibility and health impacts of promoting hand sanitizer as an alternative hand hygiene option for water-constrained environments should be assessed.
有效洗手需要可靠的供水。然而,超过 30 亿人无法在家中使用水管供水。本研究旨在解决在水资源有限的环境中改善手部卫生的挑战。在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的实地条件下,评估并比较了无水手部卫生产品——酒精基手部消毒剂的抗菌功效与用肥皂和水洗手的效果。使用手部消毒剂的母亲的双手,大肠杆菌和粪便链球菌的数量分别减少了 0.66 和 0.64 个对数。相比之下,用肥皂洗手的情况下,大肠杆菌和粪便链球菌的数量分别减少了 0.50 和 0.25 个对数。就粪便链球菌数量的减少而言,手部消毒剂明显优于用肥皂洗手(P = 0.01)。应评估推广手部消毒剂作为水资源有限环境中替代手部卫生选择的可行性和健康影响。