Suppr超能文献

电子流行病学的成功实施:丹麦“即将怀孕”妊娠计划研究。

A successful implementation of e-epidemiology: the Danish pregnancy planning study 'Snart-Gravid'.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 May;25(5):297-304. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9431-y. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

Abstract

The attraction of being able to use the internet for the recruitment of an epidemiologic cohort stems mainly from cost efficiency and convenience. The pregnancy planning study ('Snart-Gravid')-a prospective cohort study of Danish women planning a pregnancy-was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and cost efficiency of using internet-based recruitment and follow-up. Feasibility was assessed by examining patient accrual data over time, questionnaire-specific response rates and losses to follow-up. The relative cost efficiency was examined by comparing the study costs with those of an alternative non internet-based study approach. The target recruitment of 2,500 participants over 6 months was achieved using advertisements on a health-related website, supported by a coordinated media strategy at study initiation. Questionnaire cycle-specific response rates ranged from 87 to 90% over the 12-month follow-up. At 6 months, 87% of women had a known outcome or were still under follow-up; at 12 months the figure was 82%. The study cost of $400,000 ($160 per enrolled subject) compared favorably with the estimated cost to conduct the same study using a conventional non-internet based approach ($322 per subject). The gain in efficiency with the internet-based approach appeared to be even more substantial with longer follow-up and larger study sizes. The successful conduct of this pilot study suggests that the internet may be a useful tool to recruit and follow subjects in prospective cohort studies.

摘要

利用互联网招募流行病学队列的主要吸引力在于成本效益和便利性。“Snart-Gravid”(快速怀孕)研究是一项针对丹麦计划怀孕女性的前瞻性队列研究,旨在评估基于互联网的招募和随访的可行性和成本效益。通过随时间推移检查患者入组数据、问卷调查的特定响应率和随访丢失情况来评估可行性。通过将研究成本与替代的非互联网研究方法的成本进行比较来评估相对成本效益。该研究的目标是在 6 个月内通过在一个健康相关网站上发布广告,在研究启动时采用协调的媒体策略,招募 2500 名参与者。在 12 个月的随访期间,每个问卷周期的响应率从 87%到 90%不等。在 6 个月时,87%的女性有已知结局或仍在随访中;12 个月时,这一数字为 82%。研究成本为 40 万美元(每位入组患者 160 美元),与使用传统非互联网方法进行相同研究的估计成本(每位患者 322 美元)相比具有优势。随着随访时间的延长和研究规模的扩大,基于互联网的方法的效率提高似乎更为显著。这项试点研究的成功开展表明,互联网可能是招募和随访前瞻性队列研究受试者的有用工具。

相似文献

5
The PRIDE Study: Evaluation of online methods of data collection.PRIDE 研究:在线数据收集方法的评估。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;34(5):484-494. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12618. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

6
Perceived stress and semen quality.感知压力与精液质量。
Andrology. 2023 Jan;11(1):45-53. doi: 10.1111/andr.13301. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

4
New times, new needs; e-epidemiology.新时代,新需求;电子流行病学。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(5):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s10654-007-9119-0. Epub 2007 May 16.
6
Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?队列研究中的低参与率会导致偏差吗?
Epidemiology. 2006 Jul;17(4):413-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000220549.14177.60.
7
Participation in population studies.参与人群研究。
Epidemiology. 2006 May;17(3):252-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000209441.24307.92.
10
The Internet as a research tool: worth the price of admission?
Ann Behav Med. 2002 Fall;24(4):251-6. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2404_01.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验