Cranfield University, Centre for Water Science, School of Applied Sciences, College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK.
J Water Health. 2010 Jun;8(2):387-98. doi: 10.2166/wh.2010.047. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
Since publication of the 3rd Edition of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Drinking Water Quality guidelines, global adoption of water safety plans (WSPs) has been gathering momentum. Most guidance lists managerial commitment and 'buy-in' as critical to the success of WSP implementation; yet the detail on how to generate it is lacking. This commentary discusses aspects of managerial commitment to WSPs. We argue that the public health motivator should be clearer and a paramount objective and not lost among other, albeit legitimate, drivers such as political or regulatory pressures and financial efficiency.
自世界卫生组织（世卫组织）第三版《饮用水水质准则》发布以来，全球范围内采用水安全计划（WSP）的势头日益强劲。大多数指南都将管理层的承诺和“认同”列为 WSP 实施成功的关键；然而，关于如何产生这种承诺的细节却有所欠缺。本评论讨论了管理层对 WSP 的承诺方面。我们认为，公共卫生的推动力应该更加明确，成为首要目标，而不应被其他因素所掩盖，尽管这些因素如政治或监管压力和财务效率等也是合理的驱动因素。
