• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Capacity building and training approaches for water safety plans: A comprehensive literature review.能力建设和水安全计划培训方法:全面文献综述。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 May;222(4):615-627. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
2
Dual system of water safety plan auditing in Hungary: benefits and lessons learnt.匈牙利的双重水安全计划审核体系:效益和经验教训。
J Water Health. 2023 Nov;21(11):1663-1675. doi: 10.2166/wh.2023.130.
3
Ghana's water safety journey: A review of efforts toward a risked-based water quality management.加纳的水安全历程:基于风险的水质管理工作综述
J Water Health. 2024 Dec;22(12):2370-2384. doi: 10.2166/wh.2024.371. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
Development of a tool to support operationalising water safety plans: experiences from a national water utility in Ghana.开发一种支持水安全计划实施的工具:加纳一家国家水务公司的经验。
J Water Health. 2023 Dec;21(12):1761-1771. doi: 10.2166/wh.2023.100.
5
Observations and lessons learnt from more than a decade of water safety planning in South-East Asia.东南亚地区超过十年的水安全规划中的观察与经验教训。
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2017 Sep;6(2):27-33. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.213788.
6
A systematic literature review of the enabling environment elements to improve implementation of water safety plans in high-income countries.对高收入国家改善水安全计划实施的有利环境要素进行的系统文献综述。
J Water Health. 2018 Feb;16(1):14-24. doi: 10.2166/wh.2017.175.
7
Implementation of water safety plans in China: 2004-2018.中国实施水安全计划:2004-2018 年。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 Jan;223(1):106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
Implementation and evaluation of the water safety plan approach for buildings.建筑物水安全计划方法的实施与评估。
J Water Health. 2019 Dec;17(6):870-883. doi: 10.2166/wh.2019.046.
9
lmplementation of a national regulatory framework for drinking water safety plans in Uruguay.乌拉圭饮用水安全计划国家监管框架的实施。
J Water Health. 2023 Oct;21(10):1448-1459. doi: 10.2166/wh.2023.101.
10
Evaluation of water safety plan implementation at provincial water utilities in Vietnam.越南省级供水企业水安全计划实施情况评估。
J Water Health. 2023 Jan;21(1):47-65. doi: 10.2166/wh.2022.192.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening rural community water safety planning in Pacific Island countries: evidence and lessons from Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, and Fiji.加强太平洋岛国农村社区水安全规划:所罗门群岛、瓦努阿图和斐济的证据与经验。
J Water Health. 2024 Mar;22(3):467-486. doi: 10.2166/wh.2024.144. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Financial, institutional, environmental, technical, and social (FIETS) aspects of water, sanitation, and hygiene conditions in indigenous - rural Indonesia.印度尼西亚农村土著地区水、环境卫生和个人卫生条件的财政、体制、环境、技术和社会(FIETS)方面。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):1723. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11800-x.
3
A mixed methods study to evaluate participatory mapping for rural water safety planning in western Kenya.一项混合方法研究,评估肯尼亚西部农村水安全规划中的参与式绘图。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 28;16(7):e0255286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255286. eCollection 2021.
4
Development and implementation of water safety plans for groundwater resources in the southernmost city of West Azerbaijan Province, Iran.伊朗西阿塞拜疆省最南端城市地下水资源水安全计划的制定与实施。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2020 Jun 8;18(2):629-637. doi: 10.1007/s40201-020-00488-7. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Capacity challenges in water quality monitoring: understanding the role of human development.水质监测中的能力挑战:理解人类发展的作用。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Apr 19;192(5):298. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-8224-3.
6
Water safety plans for water supply utilities in China, Cuba, France, Morocco and Spain: costs, benefits, and enabling environment elements.中国、古巴、法国、摩洛哥和西班牙供水企业的水安全计划:成本、效益及有利环境因素
Urban Water J. 2019;16(4):277-288. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2019.1669191. Epub 2019 Sep 29.
7
Status of Water Safety Plan Development and Implementation in Uganda.乌干达水安全计划制定和实施现状。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 24;16(21):4096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214096.
8
Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters.美国水源风险管理框架的比较评估
AWWA Water Sci. 2019 Jan-Feb;1(1):e1125. doi: 10.1002/aws2.1125. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
A conceptual framework to evaluate the outcomes and impacts of water safety plans.一个用于评估水安全计划的成果和影响的概念框架。
J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2012 Jun;22(2):103-111. doi: 10.2166/washdev.2012.079.
2
Assessing operational performance benefits of a Water Safety Plan implemented in Southwestern France.评估法国西南部实施的《水安全计划》在运营绩效方面的效益。
Perspect Public Health. 2018 Sep;138(5):270-278. doi: 10.1177/1757913918787846. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
Measuring the Impacts of Water Safety Plans in the Asia-Pacific Region.测量亚太地区水安全计划的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 10;15(6):1223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061223.
4
A systematic literature review of the enabling environment elements to improve implementation of water safety plans in high-income countries.对高收入国家改善水安全计划实施的有利环境要素进行的系统文献综述。
J Water Health. 2018 Feb;16(1):14-24. doi: 10.2166/wh.2017.175.
5
Observations and lessons learnt from more than a decade of water safety planning in South-East Asia.东南亚地区超过十年的水安全规划中的观察与经验教训。
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2017 Sep;6(2):27-33. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.213788.
6
Risk management for drinking water safety in low and middle income countries - cultural influences on water safety plan (WSP) implementation in urban water utilities.中低收入国家饮用水安全风险管理 - 城市水企水安全计划(WSP)实施中的文化影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 15;576:895-906. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.131. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
7
Water safety plans: bridges and barriers to implementation in North Carolina.水安全计划:北卡罗来纳州实施过程中的桥梁与障碍
J Water Health. 2016 Oct;14(5):816-826. doi: 10.2166/wh.2016.011.
8
To What Extent is Drinking Water Tested in Sub-Saharan Africa? A Comparative Analysis of Regulated Water Quality Monitoring.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的饮用水检测情况如何?对规范水质监测的比较分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Mar 2;13(3):275. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030275.
9
A framework for scaling up health interventions: lessons from large-scale improvement initiatives in Africa.扩大卫生干预措施的框架:非洲大规模改进举措的经验教训
Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 29;11:12. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0374-x.
10
Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health.评估一种培训培训者的方法,以提高公共卫生领域基于证据的决策能力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 12;15:547. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1224-2.

能力建设和水安全计划培训方法:全面文献综述。

Capacity building and training approaches for water safety plans: A comprehensive literature review.

机构信息

IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611, AX, Delft, the Netherlands.

The Water Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 May;222(4):615-627. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.01.011
PMID:30744955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6545137/
Abstract

The World Health Organization has recommended Water Safety Plans (WSPs), a holistic risk assessment and risk management approach, for drinking-water suppliers across low-, middle- and high-income countries, since publishing its 2004 Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. While rapid WSP adoption has occurred, capacity is still catching up to implementation needs. Many countries and regions lack case examples, legal requirements, and training resources for WSPs, corresponding to widespread capacity shortfall in the water supply sector. We undertook a comprehensive review of the literature on capacity building and training for WSPs, with the goal of providing recommendations for multiple stakeholder groups at the scales of individual utilities, national governments, and intermediate units of governance. We propose a WSP training taxonomy and discuss it in relation to the stages of learning (introduction, practice, and reinforcement); describe the importance of customizing training to the target group, local language and circumstances; highlight the relevance of auditing for evaluating change over time; and call for robust methods to monitor WSP capacity development.

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)自 2004 年发布《饮用水水质准则》以来,一直建议低、中、高收入国家的饮用水供应商采用全面的风险评估和风险管理方法,即“水安全计划”(WSP)。虽然 WSP 的采用速度很快,但能力仍在努力跟上实施的需要。许多国家和地区缺乏 WSP 的案例示例、法律要求和培训资源,这与供水部门普遍存在的能力差距相对应。我们对 WSP 能力建设和培训的文献进行了全面审查,目的是为个人公用事业、国家政府和中间治理单位等多个利益相关者群体提供建议。我们提出了 WSP 培训分类法,并讨论了它与学习阶段(介绍、实践和强化)的关系;描述了根据目标群体、当地语言和情况定制培训的重要性;强调了审计对于评估随时间变化的重要性;并呼吁采用强有力的方法来监测 WSP 能力发展。