IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611, AX, Delft, the Netherlands.
The Water Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 May;222(4):615-627. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
The World Health Organization has recommended Water Safety Plans (WSPs), a holistic risk assessment and risk management approach, for drinking-water suppliers across low-, middle- and high-income countries, since publishing its 2004 Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. While rapid WSP adoption has occurred, capacity is still catching up to implementation needs. Many countries and regions lack case examples, legal requirements, and training resources for WSPs, corresponding to widespread capacity shortfall in the water supply sector. We undertook a comprehensive review of the literature on capacity building and training for WSPs, with the goal of providing recommendations for multiple stakeholder groups at the scales of individual utilities, national governments, and intermediate units of governance. We propose a WSP training taxonomy and discuss it in relation to the stages of learning (introduction, practice, and reinforcement); describe the importance of customizing training to the target group, local language and circumstances; highlight the relevance of auditing for evaluating change over time; and call for robust methods to monitor WSP capacity development.
世界卫生组织(WHO)自 2004 年发布《饮用水水质准则》以来,一直建议低、中、高收入国家的饮用水供应商采用全面的风险评估和风险管理方法,即“水安全计划”(WSP)。虽然 WSP 的采用速度很快,但能力仍在努力跟上实施的需要。许多国家和地区缺乏 WSP 的案例示例、法律要求和培训资源,这与供水部门普遍存在的能力差距相对应。我们对 WSP 能力建设和培训的文献进行了全面审查,目的是为个人公用事业、国家政府和中间治理单位等多个利益相关者群体提供建议。我们提出了 WSP 培训分类法,并讨论了它与学习阶段(介绍、实践和强化)的关系;描述了根据目标群体、当地语言和情况定制培训的重要性;强调了审计对于评估随时间变化的重要性;并呼吁采用强有力的方法来监测 WSP 能力发展。