• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在句子之间建立因果连贯性:一项 ERP 研究。

Establishing causal coherence across sentences: an ERP study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 May;23(5):1230-46. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21452. Epub 2010 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1162/jocn.2010.21452
PMID:20175676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3141815/
Abstract

This study examined neural activity associated with establishing causal relationships across sentences during on-line comprehension. ERPs were measured while participants read and judged the relatedness of three-sentence scenarios in which the final sentence was highly causally related, intermediately related, and causally unrelated to its context. Lexico-semantic co-occurrence was matched across the three conditions using a Latent Semantic Analysis. Critical words in causally unrelated scenarios evoked a larger N400 than words in both highly causally related and intermediately related scenarios, regardless of whether they appeared before or at the sentence-final position. At midline sites, the N400 to intermediately related sentence-final words was attenuated to the same degree as to highly causally related words, but otherwise the N400 to intermediately related words fell in between that evoked by highly causally related and intermediately related words. No modulation of the late positivity/P600 component was observed across conditions. These results indicate that both simple and complex causal inferences can influence the earliest stages of semantically processing an incoming word. Further, they suggest that causal coherence, at the situation level, can influence incremental word-by-word discourse comprehension, even when semantic relationships between individual words are matched.

摘要

本研究考察了在线理解过程中建立句子间因果关系时的神经活动。参与者阅读三句场景的句子,并判断最后一句与上下文具有高度因果关系、中等程度因果关系和无因果关系,在此过程中测量了 ERPs。使用潜在语义分析在三种条件下匹配词汇语义共现。在因果关系不相关的情况下,关键单词引发的 N400 大于高度因果关系和中等程度因果关系的情况下的 N400,无论它们出现在句子的最后位置之前还是之后。在中线部位,与高度因果关系的单词相比,与中等程度因果关系的句子最后一个单词的 N400 衰减到相同程度,但与中等程度因果关系的单词相比,N400 与高度因果关系的单词之间的差异较小。在各种条件下都没有观察到晚期正/ P600 成分的调制。这些结果表明,简单和复杂的因果推断都可以影响语义处理传入单词的最早阶段。此外,它们表明,即使单个单词之间的语义关系相匹配,情境层面的因果连贯性也可以影响逐字逐句的话语理解。

相似文献

1
Establishing causal coherence across sentences: an ERP study.在句子之间建立因果连贯性:一项 ERP 研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 May;23(5):1230-46. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21452. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
2
Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.在语境中理解词汇:阅读过程中词汇与句子层面信息的交互作用。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Mar;19(1):59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022.
3
Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: frontal positivity and N400 ERP components.词汇与句子加工中的概念预测:额部正成分和 N400 脑电成分。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Mar;83(3):382-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
4
Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.句子理解过程中句法与语义的相互作用:句法和语义违反相结合的事件相关电位效应
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370807.
5
Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation.句子理解中的双重编码、语境可用性和具体性效应:一项电生理学研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 May;25(3):721-42. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.3.721.
6
The Truth Before and After: Brain Potentials Reveal Automatic Activation of Event Knowledge during Sentence Comprehension.前后之真相:脑电位揭示句子理解过程中事件知识的自动激活
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Nov;27(11):2215-28. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00856. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
7
Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said.第二语言中的语篇理解:理解未明确表述的内容。
Brain Lang. 2016 Dec;163:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Neurophysiological measures of covert semantic processing in neurotypical adolescents actively ignoring spoken sentence inputs: A high-density event-related potential (ERP) study.神经典型青少年主动忽略口语句子输入时的隐蔽语义处理的神经生理学测量:高密度事件相关电位(ERP)研究。
Neuroscience. 2024 Nov 12;560:238-253. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.10.008. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
9
Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.基于预测过程和决策确定性的句子理解神经机制:来自一种词序灵活语言中非规范线性化的电生理证据。
Brain Res. 2016 Feb 15;1633:149-166. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.12.045. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
10
Semantic memory and verbal working memory correlates of N400 to subordinate homographs.与N400对下属同形异义词的语义记忆和言语工作记忆相关性
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):396-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.057.

引用本文的文献

1
A predictive coding model of the N400.N400的预测编码模型。
Cognition. 2024 May;246:105755. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105755. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
Causal inference: relating language to event representations and events in the world.因果推理:将语言与事件表征及现实世界中的事件联系起来。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 18;14:1172928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172928. eCollection 2023.
3
Dissociating the pre-activation of word meaning and form during sentence comprehension: Evidence from EEG representational similarity analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials.运用事件相关电位技术分离词语重复效应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Spring;3(2):131-50. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.131.
2
Individual Differences in Inference Generation: An ERP Analysis.个体推断生成的差异:一项 ERP 分析。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):776-87. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.776.
3
On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities.关于语用加工的增量性:信息性与语用能力的ERP研究
在句子理解过程中分离词义和词形的预先激活:来自 EEG 表象相似性分析的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):862-873. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02385-0. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
The role of prosody in interpreting causality in English discourse.韵律在英语话语中解释因果关系的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286003. eCollection 2023.
5
Implicit Causality and Pronoun Resolution in Intersubjective Discourse Relations.主体间话语关系中的隐性因果关系与代词指代消解
Front Psychol. 2022 May 10;13:866103. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866103. eCollection 2022.
6
A starring role for inference in the neurocognition of visual narratives.推理在视觉叙事的神经认知中的重要作用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Feb 15;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00270-9.
7
Tea With Milk? A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Sequential Event Comprehension.《饮奶茶?一种序贯事件理解的分层生成框架》
Top Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;13(1):256-298. doi: 10.1111/tops.12518. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
8
(Not so) Great Expectations: Listening to Foreign-Accented Speech Reduces the Brain's Anticipatory Processes.(未必如此的)厚望:聆听带有外国口音的讲话会减少大脑的预期过程。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 25;11:2143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02143. eCollection 2020.
9
Going the Extra Mile: Effects of Discourse Context on Two Late Positivities During Language Comprehension.更进一步:语篇语境对语言理解过程中两种晚期正波的影响。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020;1(1):135-160. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00006. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
10
A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.两种正性和 N400 的故事:在不同的表征水平上,由确认和违反预测引发的神经信号具有明显差异。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jan;32(1):12-35. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01465. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
J Mem Lang. 2010 Oct 1;63(3):324-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.005.
4
Electrophysiological insights into the processing of nominal metaphors.论名词隐喻处理的电生理学研究进展
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):1965-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
5
Speech and span: working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension.言语广度:工作记忆容量影响口语句子理解中对有生性的使用,但不影响对世界知识的使用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2886-98. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21400.
6
Right or wrong? The brain's fast response to morally objectionable statements.对还是错?大脑对道德上令人反感的陈述的快速反应。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep;20(9):1092-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02411.x. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
7
Monitoring in language perception: mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns.语言感知监测:轻度和强烈冲突引发不同的 ERP 模式。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jan;22(1):67-82. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21170.
8
When the truth is not too hard to handle: an event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation.当真相并非难以应对时:一项关于否定语用学的事件相关电位研究
Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1213-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02226.x.
9
Neurophysiological correlates of comprehending emotional meaning in context.情境中理解情感意义的神经生理关联
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Nov;21(11):2245-62. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21151.
10
Time travel through language: temporal shifts rapidly decrease information accessibility during reading.穿越语言的时间之旅:阅读过程中的时态转换会迅速降低信息的可获取性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):750-6. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.750.