Haigron Pascal, Dillenseger Jean-Louis, Luo Limin, Coatrieux Jean-Louis
INSERM, U642, and LTSI, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, F-35000, France.
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):100-4. doi: 10.1109/MEMB.2009.935459.
Beyond the advances made in computer-assisted interventions and robotic systems, the demand for more efficient and safer therapies remains challenging. Thus, if it is possible to improve the instrument tracking, steering, and target localization, to miniaturize the sensors and actuators, and to conduct preoperatively planned minimally invasive therapies, we still need new resources to achieve permanent destruction of abnormal tissues or suppression of pathological processes. Most of the physics-based (or energy-based) therapeutic principles at our disposal have been established a long time ago, but their actions on basic cellular and molecular mechanisms are not yet fully understood. They all have a wide spectrum of clinical targets in terms of organs and pathologies, modes of application (external, interstitial, intraluminal, etc.) with advantages and side-effect drawbacks, proven indications, and contraindications. Some of them may still face controversies regarding their outcomes. This short article, mainly focused on tumor destruction, briefly reviews in its first part some of these techniques and sketches the next generation under investigation. The former include radio frequency (RF), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HiFU), microwaves, and cryotherapy, of which all are temperature based. Laser-based approaches [e.g., photodynamic therapy (PDT) at large] are also discussed. Radiotherapy and its variants (hadrontherapy, brachytherapy, Gamma Knife, and CyberKnife) remain, of course, as the reference technique in cancer treatment. The next breakthroughs are examined in the second part of the article. They are based on the close association between imaging agents, drugs, and some stimulation techniques. The ongoing research efforts in that direction show that, if they are still far from clinical applications, strong expectations are made. From the point of view of interventional planning and image guidance, all of them share a lot of concerns.
除了计算机辅助干预和机器人系统方面取得的进展外,对更高效、更安全治疗方法的需求仍然具有挑战性。因此,即使能够改进器械跟踪、操控和靶点定位,使传感器和致动器小型化,并进行术前规划的微创治疗,我们仍需要新的手段来实现对异常组织的永久性破坏或对病理过程的抑制。我们现有的大多数基于物理(或能量)的治疗原理早在很久以前就已确立,但它们对基本细胞和分子机制的作用尚未完全明了。就器官和病理情况、应用方式(外部、间质、腔内等)而言,它们都有广泛的临床靶点,各有优缺点、已证实的适应症和禁忌症。其中一些方法的治疗效果可能仍存在争议。这篇短文主要聚焦于肿瘤破坏,在第一部分简要回顾了其中一些技术,并概述了正在研究的下一代技术。前者包括射频(RF)、高强度聚焦超声(HiFU)、微波和冷冻疗法,所有这些都是基于温度的。基于激光的方法[例如广义的光动力疗法(PDT)]也在讨论范围内。放射疗法及其变体(强子疗法、近距离放射疗法、伽玛刀和射波刀)当然仍是癌症治疗的参考技术。文章的第二部分探讨了未来的突破。它们基于成像剂、药物和一些刺激技术之间的紧密结合。目前在这方面的研究努力表明,尽管它们距离临床应用还很遥远,但人们寄予了厚望。从介入规划和图像引导的角度来看,所有这些都有许多共同关注点。