Suppr超能文献

[西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区非工伤病假超过15天的管理评估]

[Evaluation of the management of nonwork-related sick leave lasting more than 15 days in Catalonia (Spain)].

作者信息

Benavides Fernando G, Torá Isabel, Miguel Martínez José, Jardí Josefina, Manzanera Rafael, Alberti Constança, Delclós Jordi

机构信息

Centro de Investigación en Salud Laboral, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Gac Sanit. 2010 May-Jun;24(3):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the length of nonwork-related sick leave among cases managed by an insurance company versus those managed by the National Institute of Social Security (NISS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 289,686 cases of sick leave lasting for more than 15 days that began in 2005 after certification by a primary care physician in Catalonia, were reported to the Catalonian Institute of Medical Evaluations, and were followed to term. Of the total, 156,676 cases were managed by the NISS. To account for repeat episodes (approximately 25% of the total), the Wang-Chang estimator was used to calculate the median duration and percentiles; comparisons were made using log-logistic regression with shared gamma frailty models, with calculation of time ratios (TR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

The median duration of sick leave was 43 days for cases managed by the NISS and 39 days for those managed by the insurance company. This difference was statistically significant both for men employed under contract (TR=0.87; 95% CI: 0.85-0.88) and for those who were self-employed (TR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.75-0.80) as well as for women under contract (TR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.84-0.87) and self-employed women (TR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.81-0.88). These differences persisted after adjustment was performed for age and health region.

CONCLUSIONS

For sick leave lasting more than 15 days, these results confirm that cases managed by an insurance company ended earlier than for those managed by the NISS, both for contract and self-employed workers. Further research is needed to explore the reasons for these differences.

摘要

目的

比较保险公司管理的病例与国家社会保障研究所(NISS)管理的病例中非工作相关病假的时长。

方法

我们对289,686例持续超过15天的病假病例进行了一项回顾性队列研究,这些病例于2005年在加泰罗尼亚由初级保健医生认证后开始,上报给加泰罗尼亚医学评估研究所,并随访至结束。其中,156,676例由NISS管理。为了考虑重复发作情况(约占总数的25%),使用Wang-Chang估计量来计算中位数持续时间和百分位数;采用对数逻辑回归和共享伽马脆弱模型进行比较,计算时间比(TR)及其相应的95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

NISS管理的病例病假中位数持续时间为43天,保险公司管理的病例为39天。这种差异在合同制男性雇员(TR = 0.87;95%CI:0.85 - 0.88)、自营职业男性(TR = 0.78;95%CI:0.75 - 0.80)、合同制女性雇员(TR = 0.85;95%CI:0.84 - 0.87)以及自营职业女性(TR = 0.84;95%CI:0.81 - 0.88)中均具有统计学意义。在对年龄和健康区域进行调整后,这些差异仍然存在。

结论

对于持续超过15天的病假,这些结果证实,无论是合同制还是自营职业工人,由保险公司管理的病例比由NISS管理的病例结束得更早。需要进一步研究以探究这些差异的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验