• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于引导的方法在群组事件时间的 Cox 回归分析中估计标准误差。

Bootstrap-based methods for estimating standard errors in Cox's regression analyses of clustered event times.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A2.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):915-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.3807.

DOI:10.1002/sim.3807
PMID:20213705
Abstract

We propose two bootstrap-based methods to correct the standard errors (SEs) from Cox's model for within-cluster correlation of right-censored event times. The cluster-bootstrap method resamples, with replacement, only the clusters, whereas the two-step bootstrap method resamples (i) the clusters, and (ii) individuals within each selected cluster, with replacement. In simulations, we evaluate both methods and compare them with the existing robust variance estimator and the shared gamma frailty model, which are available in statistical software packages. We simulate clustered event time data, with latent cluster-level random effects, which are ignored in the conventional Cox's model. For cluster-level covariates, both proposed bootstrap methods yield accurate SEs, and type I error rates, and acceptable coverage rates, regardless of the true random effects distribution, and avoid serious variance under-estimation by conventional Cox-based standard errors. However, the two-step bootstrap method over-estimates the variance for individual-level covariates. We also apply the proposed bootstrap methods to obtain confidence bands around flexible estimates of time-dependent effects in a real-life analysis of cluster event times.

摘要

我们提出了两种基于 bootstrap 的方法来校正 Cox 模型中右删失事件时间的簇内相关的标准误差(SE)。簇引导法仅对簇进行有放回的重采样,而两步引导法对(i)簇和(ii)每个选定簇中的个体进行有放回的重采样。在模拟中,我们评估了这两种方法,并将它们与现有的稳健方差估计量和共享伽马 frailty 模型进行了比较,这些模型在统计软件包中都可用。我们模拟了具有潜在聚类水平随机效应的聚类事件时间数据,这些随机效应在传统的 Cox 模型中被忽略。对于聚类水平的协变量,两种提议的引导法都产生了准确的 SE 和误差率,并且接受了可接受的覆盖范围,无论真实的随机效应分布如何,并且避免了传统的基于 Cox 的标准误差的严重方差低估。然而,两步引导法高估了个体水平协变量的方差。我们还将提出的引导法应用于实际的聚类事件时间分析中,以获得时变效应的灵活估计的置信带。

相似文献

1
Bootstrap-based methods for estimating standard errors in Cox's regression analyses of clustered event times.基于引导的方法在群组事件时间的 Cox 回归分析中估计标准误差。
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):915-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.3807.
2
Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.在分析整群随机试验成本数据中使用自助法:一些模拟结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Nov 18;4(1):33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-33.
3
Variance estimation for clustered recurrent event data with a small number of clusters.具有少量聚类的聚类复发事件数据的方差估计。
Stat Med. 2005 Oct 15;24(19):3037-51. doi: 10.1002/sim.2157.
4
Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.在 Cox 回归模型中估计调整后的风险差异 (RD) 和需要治疗的人数 (NNT) 指标。
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):851-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3793.
5
A multiple imputation approach for clustered interval-censored survival data.一种针对群组区间删失生存数据的多重插补方法。
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 15;29(6):680-93. doi: 10.1002/sim.3835.
6
A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验中组内相关系数置信区间方法的比较
Stat Med. 2002 Dec 30;21(24):3757-74. doi: 10.1002/sim.1330.
7
Comparison of Cox's and relative survival models when estimating the effects of prognostic factors on disease-specific mortality: a simulation study under proportional excess hazards.在估计预后因素对疾病特异性死亡率的影响时Cox模型与相对生存模型的比较:比例超额风险下的模拟研究
Stat Med. 2005 Dec 30;24(24):3887-909. doi: 10.1002/sim.2392.
8
Flexible modeling of competing risks in survival analysis.生存分析中竞争风险的灵活建模。
Stat Med. 2010 Oct 15;29(23):2453-68. doi: 10.1002/sim.4005.
9
Non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient.组内相关系数的非参数自助置信区间。
Stat Med. 2003 Dec 30;22(24):3805-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.1643.
10
Parametric bootstrap for testing model fitting in the proportional hazards framework: an application to the survival analysis of Bruna dels Pirineus beef calves.用于检验比例风险框架中模型拟合的参数自抽样法:在布吕纳-德尔斯-皮雷内斯肉牛犊生存分析中的应用
J Anim Sci. 2006 Oct;84(10):2609-16. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-729.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines and Hybrid Immunity in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Symptomatic COVID-19 Among Adults in the United States.美国成年人中mRNA新冠疫苗及混合免疫在预防SARS-CoV-2感染和有症状的新冠病毒病方面的有效性
J Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 15;231(4):e743-e753. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaf007.
2
Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children and Adolescents Aged 5 to 17 Years.二价mRNA新冠疫苗在预防5至17岁儿童和青少年感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2中的有效性
JAMA. 2024 Feb 6;331(5):408-416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27022.
3
An initiative for a more inclusive working life and its effect on return-to-work after sickness absence: a multistate longitudinal cohort study.
一项更具包容性的工作生活倡议及其对病假后重返工作岗位的影响:一项多州纵向队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e062558. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062558.
4
Nurse staffing practices and adverse events in acute care hospitals: The research protocol of a multisite patient-level longitudinal study.护士人员配备实践与急性护理医院不良事件:一项多地点患者水平纵向研究的研究方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Mar;77(3):1567-1577. doi: 10.1111/jan.14710. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
5
Validating surgical procedure codes for inflammatory bowel disease in the Swedish National Patient Register.验证瑞典国家患者登记处中炎症性肠病的手术程序代码。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0948-z.
6
Effect of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Intervention on Adverse Drug Events: A Cluster Randomized Trial.电子药物重整干预对药物不良事件的影响:一项群组随机试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10756.
7
Can Hyperparameter Tuning Improve the Performance of a Super Learner?: A Case Study.超参数调优能否提高超级学习者的性能?:一项案例研究。
Epidemiology. 2019 Jul;30(4):521-531. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001027.
8
Derivation and validation of a multivariable model to predict when primary care physicians prescribe antidepressants for indications other than depression.用于预测基层医疗医生何时会因抑郁症以外的适应症开具抗抑郁药的多变量模型的推导与验证。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 18;10:457-474. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S153000. eCollection 2018.
9
Assessing the accuracy of using diagnostic codes from administrative data to infer antidepressant treatment indications: a validation study.评估使用行政数据中的诊断代码推断抗抑郁药物治疗指征的准确性:一项验证研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):1101-1111. doi: 10.1002/pds.4436. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
10
Off-label indications for antidepressants in primary care: descriptive study of prescriptions from an indication based electronic prescribing system.基层医疗中抗抑郁药的非适应证用药:基于适应证的电子处方系统处方描述性研究
BMJ. 2017 Feb 21;356:j603. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j603.