Rose Sherri, van der Laan Mark J
University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Int J Biostat. 2008 Sep 29;4(1):Article 19. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1115.
Researchers of uncommon diseases are often interested in assessing potential risk factors. Given the low incidence of disease, these studies are frequently case-control in design. Such a design allows a sufficient number of cases to be obtained without extensive sampling and can increase efficiency; however, these case-control samples are then biased since the proportion of cases in the sample is not the same as the population of interest. Methods for analyzing case-control studies have focused on utilizing logistic regression models that provide conditional and not causal estimates of the odds ratio. This article will demonstrate the use of the prevalence probability and case-control weighted targeted maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), as described by van der Laan (2008), in order to obtain causal estimates of the parameters of interest (risk difference, relative risk, and odds ratio). It is meant to be used as a guide for researchers, with step-by-step directions to implement this methodology. We will also present simulation studies that show the improved efficiency of the case-control weighted targeted MLE compared to other techniques.
罕见病研究人员通常对评估潜在风险因素感兴趣。鉴于疾病发病率较低,这些研究在设计上通常为病例对照研究。这种设计无需大量抽样就能获得足够数量的病例,并且可以提高效率;然而,这些病例对照样本随后会产生偏差,因为样本中病例的比例与目标人群的比例不同。分析病例对照研究的方法主要集中在使用逻辑回归模型,该模型提供的是比值比的条件估计而非因果估计。本文将演示如范德·兰(2008年)所述的患病率概率和病例对照加权目标最大似然估计(MLE)的用法,以便获得感兴趣参数(风险差、相对风险和比值比)的因果估计。它旨在作为研究人员的指南,提供实施该方法的逐步指导。我们还将展示模拟研究,结果表明与其他技术相比,病例对照加权目标MLE的效率更高。