• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国立癌症研究所网站上有关乳腺癌预防的患者信息的可读性。

Readability of patient information regarding breast cancer prevention from the Web site of the National Cancer Institute.

作者信息

Hoppe Ian C

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2010 Dec;25(4):490-2. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0101-2.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-010-0101-2
PMID:20238201
Abstract

The increasing use of the Internet for gathering information regarding preventative health measures creates a unique dilemma. Access to the Internet is almost universal in the USA. Web sites presenting health information regarding breast cancer must create information that is understandable to the general public, meaning a reading level of around seventh grade. Text was obtained from the National Cancer Institute's Web site, and an examination of the text's grade level was performed. The text was written at between a 10th and 12th grade level. This indicates that information regarding breast cancer prevention obtained from the National Cancer Institute's web site is written at far too high of a level.

摘要

互联网在收集预防性健康措施信息方面的使用日益增加,这带来了一个独特的难题。在美国,互联网接入几乎普及。提供有关乳腺癌健康信息的网站必须创建普通公众能够理解的信息,这意味着阅读水平大约在七年级左右。文本取自美国国家癌症研究所的网站,并对文本的年级水平进行了检查。该文本的写作水平在十年级到十二年级之间。这表明从美国国家癌症研究所网站获取的有关乳腺癌预防的信息所针对的阅读水平过高。

相似文献

1
Readability of patient information regarding breast cancer prevention from the Web site of the National Cancer Institute.美国国立癌症研究所网站上有关乳腺癌预防的患者信息的可读性。
J Cancer Educ. 2010 Dec;25(4):490-2. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0101-2.
2
An analysis of the readability and cultural sensitivity of information on the National Cancer Institute's Web site: CancerNet.对美国国立癌症研究所网站“癌症网”(CancerNet)上信息的可读性和文化敏感性分析。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Oct;27(9):1403-9.
3
Diabetes websites accredited by the Health On the Net Foundation Code of Conduct: readable or not?经健康上网基金会行为准则认证的糖尿病网站:是否易于阅读?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:655-60.
4
Readability of cancer information on the internet.互联网上癌症信息的可读性。
J Cancer Educ. 2004 Summer;19(2):117-22. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce1902_13.
5
Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.基于互联网的乳腺癌筛查乳腺X线摄影相关患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.互联网搜索词会影响有关发育性髋关节发育不良的在线信息的质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Jun;33(4):361-5. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31827d0dd2.
7
Structure and content of chronic kidney disease information on the World Wide Web: barriers to public understanding of a pandemic.万维网上慢性肾脏病信息的结构与内容:公众理解这一流行病的障碍
Nephrol News Issues. 2004 Oct;18(11):76, 78-9, 81-4.
8
British internet-derived patient information on diabetes mellitus: is it readable?源自英国互联网的糖尿病患者信息:它易读吗?
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005 Jun;7(3):528-35. doi: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.528.
9
Readability of Orthopaedic Oncology-related Patient Education Materials Available on the Internet.互联网上骨科肿瘤相关患者教育材料的可读性
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;23(12):783-8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00324. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
10
Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.基于网络的结直肠癌筛查患者教育材料的可读性、适宜性和健康内容评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Arthroplasty information on the internet: quality or quantity?互联网上的关节置换术信息:质量还是数量?
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Apr 20;1(4):64-73. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.14.BJO-2020-0006. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Health Literacy Considerations for a New Cancer Prevention Initiative.癌症预防新举措中的健康素养考量
Gerontologist. 2019 May 17;59(Suppl 1):S7-S16. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz032.
3
Why People Living With and Beyond Cancer Use the Internet.为什么癌症患者和康复者使用互联网。

本文引用的文献

1
Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives on quality and content of information on the Internet.搜索青少年特发性关节炎:关于互联网上信息质量和内容的观点
J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug;36(8):1755-62. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081010. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
2
A new readability yardstick.一种新的可读性衡量标准。
J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):221-33. doi: 10.1037/h0057532.
3
Suitability and readability assessment of educational print resources related to physical activity: implications and recommendations for practice.与体育活动相关的教育印刷资源的适用性和可读性评估:对实践的启示与建议
Integr Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1534735419829830. doi: 10.1177/1534735419829830.
4
Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment.互联网上的胸外科手术信息:多语言质量评估
Interact J Med Res. 2017 May 12;6(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.6732.
5
Validation and Assessment of a Technology Familiarity Score in Patients Attending a Symptomatic Breast Clinic.对有症状乳腺门诊患者技术熟悉度评分的验证与评估
World J Surg. 2015 Oct;39(10):2441-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3134-1.
6
Un Abrazo Para La Familia: an evidenced-based rehabilitation approach in providing cancer education to low-SES Hispanic co-survivors.给家庭的一个拥抱:一种为低收入西班牙裔共同幸存者提供癌症教育的循证康复方法。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Dec;29(4):626-33. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0593-7.
7
A quantitative assessment of changing trends in internet usage for cancer information.互联网使用变化趋势的定量评估——癌症信息。
World J Surg. 2011 Feb;35(2):253-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0830-8.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.010. Epub 2008 May 2.
4
Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites.美国骨科医师学会和北美小儿骨科学会网站上患者教育资料的可读性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):199-204. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00347.
5
Analysis of stroke patients' and carers' reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information.中风患者及其护理人员阅读能力分析以及书面材料的内容与设计:改善中风书面信息的建议
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.020. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
6
Do women read poster displays on breast cancer in waiting rooms?女性会在候诊室阅读关于乳腺癌的海报展示吗?
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Dec;26(4):355-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh178.
7
An evaluation of the quality and contents of asthma education on the World Wide Web.万维网上哮喘教育的质量与内容评估
Chest. 2002 Apr;121(4):1301-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.4.1301.
8
The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web.万维网上儿科患者教育资料的可读性。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jul;155(7):807-12. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.7.807.
9
Anticoagulant patient information material is written at high readability levels.抗凝剂患者信息材料的编写具有较高的易读性水平。
Stroke. 2000 Dec;31(12):2966-70. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.12.2966.
10
Accessibility of information on the web.网络信息的可获取性。
Nature. 1999 Jul 8;400(6740):107-9. doi: 10.1038/21987.